具有认知挑战性的敏捷训练营项目对帕金森病患者平衡和步态的影响:步态冻结是否重要?

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1177/15459683221119757
Vrutangkumar V Shah, Rodrigo Vitorio, Naoya Hasegawa, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, John G Nutt, Laurie A King, Martina Mancini, Fay B Horak
{"title":"具有认知挑战性的敏捷训练营项目对帕金森病患者平衡和步态的影响:步态冻结是否重要?","authors":"Vrutangkumar V Shah, Rodrigo Vitorio, Naoya Hasegawa, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, John G Nutt, Laurie A King, Martina Mancini, Fay B Horak","doi":"10.1177/15459683221119757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without freezing of Gait (FoG) may respond differently to exercise interventions for several reasons, including disease duration. This study aimed to determine whether both people with and without FoG benefit from the Agility Boot Camp with Cognitive Challenges (ABC-C) program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of our ABC-C trial included 86 PD subjects: 44 without FoG (PD-FoG) and 42 with FoG (PD + FoG). We collected measures of standing sway balance, anticipatory postural adjustments, postural responses, and a 2-minute walk with and without a cognitive task. Two-way repeated analysis of variance, with disease duration as covariate, was used to investigate the effects of ABC-C program. Effect sizes were calculated using standardized response mean (SRM) for PD-FoG and PD + FoG, separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ABC-C program was effective in improving gait performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG, even after controlling for disease duration. Specifically, dual-task gait speed (<i>P</i> < .0001), dual-cost stride length (<i>P</i> = .012), and these single-task measures: arm range of motion (<i>P</i> < .0001), toe-off angle (<i>P</i> = .005), gait cycle duration variability (<i>P</i> = .019), trunk coronal range of motion (<i>P</i> = .042), and stance time (<i>P</i> = .046) improved in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG. There was no interaction effect between time (before and after exercise) and group (PD-FoG/PD + FoG) in all 24 objective measures of balance and gait. Dual-task gait speed improved the most in PD + FoG (SRM = 1.01), whereas single-task arm range of motion improved the most in PD-FoG (SRM = 1.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ABC-C program was similarly effective in improving gait (and not balance) performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"36 9","pages":"603-612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Cognitively Challenging Agility Boot Camp Program on Balance and Gait in People With Parkinson's Disease: Does Freezing of Gait Status Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Vrutangkumar V Shah, Rodrigo Vitorio, Naoya Hasegawa, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, John G Nutt, Laurie A King, Martina Mancini, Fay B Horak\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221119757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without freezing of Gait (FoG) may respond differently to exercise interventions for several reasons, including disease duration. This study aimed to determine whether both people with and without FoG benefit from the Agility Boot Camp with Cognitive Challenges (ABC-C) program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of our ABC-C trial included 86 PD subjects: 44 without FoG (PD-FoG) and 42 with FoG (PD + FoG). We collected measures of standing sway balance, anticipatory postural adjustments, postural responses, and a 2-minute walk with and without a cognitive task. Two-way repeated analysis of variance, with disease duration as covariate, was used to investigate the effects of ABC-C program. Effect sizes were calculated using standardized response mean (SRM) for PD-FoG and PD + FoG, separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ABC-C program was effective in improving gait performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG, even after controlling for disease duration. Specifically, dual-task gait speed (<i>P</i> < .0001), dual-cost stride length (<i>P</i> = .012), and these single-task measures: arm range of motion (<i>P</i> < .0001), toe-off angle (<i>P</i> = .005), gait cycle duration variability (<i>P</i> = .019), trunk coronal range of motion (<i>P</i> = .042), and stance time (<i>P</i> = .046) improved in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG. There was no interaction effect between time (before and after exercise) and group (PD-FoG/PD + FoG) in all 24 objective measures of balance and gait. Dual-task gait speed improved the most in PD + FoG (SRM = 1.01), whereas single-task arm range of motion improved the most in PD-FoG (SRM = 1.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ABC-C program was similarly effective in improving gait (and not balance) performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"36 9\",\"pages\":\"603-612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561861/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221119757\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221119757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:帕金森病(PD)患者有步态冻结(FoG)和没有步态冻结(FoG),由于疾病持续时间等多种原因,他们对运动干预措施的反应可能不同。本研究旨在确定帕金森病步态冻结患者和非步态冻结患者是否都能从 "认知挑战敏捷训练营"(ABC-C)项目中获益:这项对 ABC-C 试验的二次分析包括 86 名 PD 受试者:方法:ABC-C 试验的二次分析包括 86 名帕金森病受试者:44 名无 FoG(PD-FoG),42 名有 FoG(PD + FoG)。我们收集了站立摇摆平衡、预期姿势调整、姿势反应以及有认知任务和无认知任务的 2 分钟步行的测量数据。我们采用双向重复方差分析(以病程作为协变量)来研究 ABC-C 计划的效果。疗效大小采用标准化反应平均值(SRM)计算,分别针对PD-FoG和PD + FoG:结果:即使控制了病程,ABC-C 训练计划仍能有效改善 PD-FoG 和 PD + FoG 的步态表现。具体来说,PD-FoG 和 PD + FoG 的双任务步态速度(P P = .012)以及这些单任务测量指标:手臂运动范围(P P = .005)、步态周期持续时间变异性(P = .019)、躯干冠状运动范围(P = .042)和站立时间(P = .046)均有所改善。在平衡和步态的所有 24 项客观测量中,时间(运动前和运动后)与组别(PD-FoG/PD + FoG)之间没有交互效应。PD + FoG组的双任务步速改善最大(SRM = 1.01),而PD-FoG组的单任务手臂活动范围改善最大(SRM = 1.01):结论:ABC-C 方案在改善 PD-FoG 和 PD + FoG 的步态(而非平衡)表现方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a Cognitively Challenging Agility Boot Camp Program on Balance and Gait in People With Parkinson's Disease: Does Freezing of Gait Status Matter?

Background and aim: Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without freezing of Gait (FoG) may respond differently to exercise interventions for several reasons, including disease duration. This study aimed to determine whether both people with and without FoG benefit from the Agility Boot Camp with Cognitive Challenges (ABC-C) program.

Methods: This secondary analysis of our ABC-C trial included 86 PD subjects: 44 without FoG (PD-FoG) and 42 with FoG (PD + FoG). We collected measures of standing sway balance, anticipatory postural adjustments, postural responses, and a 2-minute walk with and without a cognitive task. Two-way repeated analysis of variance, with disease duration as covariate, was used to investigate the effects of ABC-C program. Effect sizes were calculated using standardized response mean (SRM) for PD-FoG and PD + FoG, separately.

Results: The ABC-C program was effective in improving gait performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG, even after controlling for disease duration. Specifically, dual-task gait speed (P < .0001), dual-cost stride length (P = .012), and these single-task measures: arm range of motion (P < .0001), toe-off angle (P = .005), gait cycle duration variability (P = .019), trunk coronal range of motion (P = .042), and stance time (P = .046) improved in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG. There was no interaction effect between time (before and after exercise) and group (PD-FoG/PD + FoG) in all 24 objective measures of balance and gait. Dual-task gait speed improved the most in PD + FoG (SRM = 1.01), whereas single-task arm range of motion improved the most in PD-FoG (SRM = 1.01).

Conclusion: The ABC-C program was similarly effective in improving gait (and not balance) performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信