采用稳健优化方法表征地应力和地质力学特性,在阿曼苏丹国致密气田进行了测试

Hamdan Saidi, Mohammed A-Aamri, A. Al - Senani, Khalid AL-Aani
{"title":"采用稳健优化方法表征地应力和地质力学特性,在阿曼苏丹国致密气田进行了测试","authors":"Hamdan Saidi, Mohammed A-Aamri, A. Al - Senani, Khalid AL-Aani","doi":"10.2118/200097-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Knowledge of in-situ stresses and geomechanical properties is important for wellbore stability and hydraulic fracture optimization applications. Both mechanical rock properties (e.g., Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio) and the stresses represent the initial step in constructing a geomechanical model that will eventually require static calibration from the lab or field tests. Nonetheless, a wellbore deformation-based inverse analysis solution has become an alternative method that characterizes in-situ stress in particular. In this paper, a genetic algorithm and probabilistic analysis methods are proposed and integrated into a well-drilled known analytical method to characterize both stresses and geomechanical properties.\n Systematic steps have been applied to this analysis. First, borehole geometry (i.e., multi-arm caliper), mud weight, and vertical pressure (from the density log) are well-defined inputs for deformation-stress relationships. Unknown parameters have also been determined and include horizontal stress, Poisson's ratio, and Young's modulus. Subsequently, the minimum and maximum expected values for each unknown parameter have been defined. Thousands of combinations have been created by the analytical equation (fitness function). In addition, the semi-genetic algorithm concept was used as an optimization method to find the best solution from a wide range of inputs for a given fitness function. The first hundred strongest fitness combinations were then chosen for the next level, which had a noticeably higher frequency number using the statistical analysis technique. The approach was checked with a real field example, the results indicated the measured values of geomechanical properties, and horizontal stress were reasonably consistent with the actual field data and previous studies in the field. In particular, the proposed approach allows for a realistic estimate of the most difficult stress (i.e., Max horizontal stress), which was ~45 % higher than minimum horizontal stress.\n The proposed technique was developed to reduce in-situ pressure uncertainties and geomechanical properties for the studied area. Results from this paper presented a simple and practical alternative method for the determination of geomechanical parameters using a simple logging tool (e.g., a caliper) that theoretically provides a robustness guide for wellbore stability and hydraulic fracture models for tight gas fields.","PeriodicalId":10912,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Situ Stresses and Geomechanical Properties Characterization Using Robust Optimization Approach, Tested in a Tight Gas field, Sultanate of Oman\",\"authors\":\"Hamdan Saidi, Mohammed A-Aamri, A. Al - Senani, Khalid AL-Aani\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/200097-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Knowledge of in-situ stresses and geomechanical properties is important for wellbore stability and hydraulic fracture optimization applications. Both mechanical rock properties (e.g., Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio) and the stresses represent the initial step in constructing a geomechanical model that will eventually require static calibration from the lab or field tests. Nonetheless, a wellbore deformation-based inverse analysis solution has become an alternative method that characterizes in-situ stress in particular. In this paper, a genetic algorithm and probabilistic analysis methods are proposed and integrated into a well-drilled known analytical method to characterize both stresses and geomechanical properties.\\n Systematic steps have been applied to this analysis. First, borehole geometry (i.e., multi-arm caliper), mud weight, and vertical pressure (from the density log) are well-defined inputs for deformation-stress relationships. Unknown parameters have also been determined and include horizontal stress, Poisson's ratio, and Young's modulus. Subsequently, the minimum and maximum expected values for each unknown parameter have been defined. Thousands of combinations have been created by the analytical equation (fitness function). In addition, the semi-genetic algorithm concept was used as an optimization method to find the best solution from a wide range of inputs for a given fitness function. The first hundred strongest fitness combinations were then chosen for the next level, which had a noticeably higher frequency number using the statistical analysis technique. The approach was checked with a real field example, the results indicated the measured values of geomechanical properties, and horizontal stress were reasonably consistent with the actual field data and previous studies in the field. In particular, the proposed approach allows for a realistic estimate of the most difficult stress (i.e., Max horizontal stress), which was ~45 % higher than minimum horizontal stress.\\n The proposed technique was developed to reduce in-situ pressure uncertainties and geomechanical properties for the studied area. Results from this paper presented a simple and practical alternative method for the determination of geomechanical parameters using a simple logging tool (e.g., a caliper) that theoretically provides a robustness guide for wellbore stability and hydraulic fracture models for tight gas fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/200097-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200097-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解地应力和地质力学特性对于井筒稳定性和水力压裂优化应用非常重要。岩石力学特性(如杨氏模量和泊松比)和应力是构建地质力学模型的第一步,最终需要实验室或现场测试的静态校准。尽管如此,基于井筒变形的反分析解决方案已经成为一种替代方法,特别是地应力特征。本文提出了一种遗传算法和概率分析方法,并将其整合到一种众所周知的分析方法中,以表征应力和地质力学特性。这一分析采用了系统的步骤。首先,井眼几何形状(即多臂井径器)、泥浆比重和垂直压力(来自密度测井)是变形-应力关系的明确输入。未知参数也已确定,包括水平应力、泊松比和杨氏模量。然后,定义了每个未知参数的最小期望值和最大期望值。通过解析方程(适应度函数)创建了数千种组合。此外,采用半遗传算法概念作为优化方法,从给定适应度函数的大范围输入中寻找最优解。然后选择前100个最强的适应度组合进入下一级,使用统计分析技术,该组合的频率数字明显更高。通过现场实例对该方法进行了验证,结果表明,该方法的地质力学特性、水平应力测量值与现场实测数据和前人研究结果基本吻合。特别是,所提出的方法允许对最困难的应力(即最大水平应力)进行现实估计,其比最小水平应力高约45%。该技术的开发是为了减少研究区域的原位压力不确定性和地质力学性质。本文的研究结果提供了一种简单实用的替代方法,即利用简单的测井工具(如井径仪)确定地质力学参数,理论上为致密气田的井筒稳定性和水力压裂模型提供了鲁棒性指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-Situ Stresses and Geomechanical Properties Characterization Using Robust Optimization Approach, Tested in a Tight Gas field, Sultanate of Oman
Knowledge of in-situ stresses and geomechanical properties is important for wellbore stability and hydraulic fracture optimization applications. Both mechanical rock properties (e.g., Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio) and the stresses represent the initial step in constructing a geomechanical model that will eventually require static calibration from the lab or field tests. Nonetheless, a wellbore deformation-based inverse analysis solution has become an alternative method that characterizes in-situ stress in particular. In this paper, a genetic algorithm and probabilistic analysis methods are proposed and integrated into a well-drilled known analytical method to characterize both stresses and geomechanical properties. Systematic steps have been applied to this analysis. First, borehole geometry (i.e., multi-arm caliper), mud weight, and vertical pressure (from the density log) are well-defined inputs for deformation-stress relationships. Unknown parameters have also been determined and include horizontal stress, Poisson's ratio, and Young's modulus. Subsequently, the minimum and maximum expected values for each unknown parameter have been defined. Thousands of combinations have been created by the analytical equation (fitness function). In addition, the semi-genetic algorithm concept was used as an optimization method to find the best solution from a wide range of inputs for a given fitness function. The first hundred strongest fitness combinations were then chosen for the next level, which had a noticeably higher frequency number using the statistical analysis technique. The approach was checked with a real field example, the results indicated the measured values of geomechanical properties, and horizontal stress were reasonably consistent with the actual field data and previous studies in the field. In particular, the proposed approach allows for a realistic estimate of the most difficult stress (i.e., Max horizontal stress), which was ~45 % higher than minimum horizontal stress. The proposed technique was developed to reduce in-situ pressure uncertainties and geomechanical properties for the studied area. Results from this paper presented a simple and practical alternative method for the determination of geomechanical parameters using a simple logging tool (e.g., a caliper) that theoretically provides a robustness guide for wellbore stability and hydraulic fracture models for tight gas fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信