现代代码审查中的审查参与:Android、Qt和OpenStack项目的实证研究(期刊第一摘要)

2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) Pub Date : 2018-03-20 DOI:10.1109/SANER.2018.8330241

Patanamon Thongtanunam, Shane McIntosh, A. Hassan, Hajimu Iida

{"title":"现代代码审查中的审查参与:Android、Qt和OpenStack项目的实证研究(期刊第一摘要)","authors":"Patanamon Thongtanunam, Shane McIntosh, A. Hassan, Hajimu Iida","doi":"10.1109/SANER.2018.8330241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper empirically investigates the factors influence review participation in the MCR process. Through a case study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack open source projects, we find that the amount of review participation in the past is a significant indicator of patches that will suffer from poor review participation. Moreover, the description length of a patch and the purpose of introducing new features also share a relationship with the likelihood of receiving poor review participation. This paper is an extended abstract of a paper published in the Empirical Software Engineering journal. The original paper is communicated by Jeffrey C. Carver.","PeriodicalId":6541,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"08 1","pages":"475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review participation in modern code review: An empirical study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack projects (journal-first abstract)\",\"authors\":\"Patanamon Thongtanunam, Shane McIntosh, A. Hassan, Hajimu Iida\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SANER.2018.8330241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper empirically investigates the factors influence review participation in the MCR process. Through a case study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack open source projects, we find that the amount of review participation in the past is a significant indicator of patches that will suffer from poor review participation. Moreover, the description length of a patch and the purpose of introducing new features also share a relationship with the likelihood of receiving poor review participation. This paper is an extended abstract of a paper published in the Empirical Software Engineering journal. The original paper is communicated by Jeffrey C. Carver.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"volume\":\"08 1\",\"pages\":\"475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 27

摘要

本文对MCR过程中影响评审参与的因素进行了实证研究。通过对Android、Qt和OpenStack开源项目的案例研究，我们发现，过去的审查参与数量是一个重要的指标，表明补丁将受到不良审查参与的影响。此外，补丁的描述长度和引入新特性的目的也与接受不良评论参与的可能性有一定的关系。本文是发表在《经验软件工程》杂志上的一篇论文的扩展摘要。原文由Jeffrey C. Carver传达。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Review participation in modern code review: An empirical study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack projects (journal-first abstract)

This paper empirically investigates the factors influence review participation in the MCR process. Through a case study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack open source projects, we find that the amount of review participation in the past is a significant indicator of patches that will suffer from poor review participation. Moreover, the description length of a patch and the purpose of introducing new features also share a relationship with the likelihood of receiving poor review participation. This paper is an extended abstract of a paper published in the Empirical Software Engineering journal. The original paper is communicated by Jeffrey C. Carver.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)

自引率

0.00%

发文量