初级保健中焦虑症的流行病学研究:顺势疗法在治疗方法中的整合

Gualberto Díaz Sáez , Sylvaine Balmy , Alberto Sacristán Rubio , María Luisa Rodríguez García , Cristina Ramírez Tirado , Stéphanie Villet
{"title":"初级保健中焦虑症的流行病学研究:顺势疗法在治疗方法中的整合","authors":"Gualberto Díaz Sáez ,&nbsp;Sylvaine Balmy ,&nbsp;Alberto Sacristán Rubio ,&nbsp;María Luisa Rodríguez García ,&nbsp;Cristina Ramírez Tirado ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Villet","doi":"10.1016/j.homeo.2015.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To characterise the epidemiological and clinical profile of patients attending a primary care (PC) unit due to anxiety disorder (AD), determine the therapeutic management in real clinical practice, and evaluate the short-term effect of the most frequent combination therapies, including homeopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Epidemiological, prospective, and multicentre study involving clinical data from 110 patients under supervision of 15 PC physicians who were familiar with the use of homeopathic agents. The clinical evaluation was established by Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Anxiety Visual Analogue Scale, and Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale, over 60 days of follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patient with AD was predominantly female. Two-thirds experienced generalized AD or panic disorder, and almost 20% had psychological comorbidities. The treatment with several drugs was more frequent than monotherapy, consisting mainly in the combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and a complex homeopathic drug (27.3%). The clinical evaluation was favourable, defined by a statically significant decrease in anxiety, but with no differences between the combinations of treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PC physicians who are familiar with the use of homeopathic agents already use them as a complementary therapeutic option in the management of AD. According to the favourable clinical results achieved with single as well as combined therapy, this clinical practice should be integrated into the management of AD in PC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101115,"journal":{"name":"Revista Médica de Homeopatía","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 61-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.homeo.2015.07.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estudio epidemiológico sobre trastornos de ansiedad en atención primaria: integración de la homeopatía en el abordaje terapéutico\",\"authors\":\"Gualberto Díaz Sáez ,&nbsp;Sylvaine Balmy ,&nbsp;Alberto Sacristán Rubio ,&nbsp;María Luisa Rodríguez García ,&nbsp;Cristina Ramírez Tirado ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Villet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.homeo.2015.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To characterise the epidemiological and clinical profile of patients attending a primary care (PC) unit due to anxiety disorder (AD), determine the therapeutic management in real clinical practice, and evaluate the short-term effect of the most frequent combination therapies, including homeopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Epidemiological, prospective, and multicentre study involving clinical data from 110 patients under supervision of 15 PC physicians who were familiar with the use of homeopathic agents. The clinical evaluation was established by Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Anxiety Visual Analogue Scale, and Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale, over 60 days of follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patient with AD was predominantly female. Two-thirds experienced generalized AD or panic disorder, and almost 20% had psychological comorbidities. The treatment with several drugs was more frequent than monotherapy, consisting mainly in the combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and a complex homeopathic drug (27.3%). The clinical evaluation was favourable, defined by a statically significant decrease in anxiety, but with no differences between the combinations of treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PC physicians who are familiar with the use of homeopathic agents already use them as a complementary therapeutic option in the management of AD. According to the favourable clinical results achieved with single as well as combined therapy, this clinical practice should be integrated into the management of AD in PC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Médica de Homeopatía\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 61-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.homeo.2015.07.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Médica de Homeopatía\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888852615000247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Médica de Homeopatía","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888852615000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解因焦虑障碍(AD)就诊的初级保健(PC)患者的流行病学和临床特征,确定实际临床实践中的治疗管理,并评估最常见的联合治疗(包括顺势疗法)的短期效果。患者和方法流行病学、前瞻性和多中心研究,涉及来自110名患者的临床数据,由15名熟悉顺势疗法药物使用的PC医生监督。采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表、焦虑视觉模拟量表和临床整体印象变化量表进行临床评价,随访60天。结果AD患者以女性为主。三分之二的人患有广泛性AD或惊恐障碍,近20%的人有心理合并症。多种药物联合治疗比单一治疗更常见,主要包括选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂、苯二氮卓类药物和一种复合顺势疗法药物的联合治疗(27.3%)。临床评价是有利的,焦虑显著减少,但治疗组合之间没有差异。结论熟悉顺势疗法药物使用的医生已经将其作为AD治疗的补充治疗选择。根据单一和联合治疗取得的良好临床效果,这种临床实践应纳入PC患者AD的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estudio epidemiológico sobre trastornos de ansiedad en atención primaria: integración de la homeopatía en el abordaje terapéutico

Objectives

To characterise the epidemiological and clinical profile of patients attending a primary care (PC) unit due to anxiety disorder (AD), determine the therapeutic management in real clinical practice, and evaluate the short-term effect of the most frequent combination therapies, including homeopathy.

Patients and methods

Epidemiological, prospective, and multicentre study involving clinical data from 110 patients under supervision of 15 PC physicians who were familiar with the use of homeopathic agents. The clinical evaluation was established by Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Anxiety Visual Analogue Scale, and Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale, over 60 days of follow-up.

Results

The patient with AD was predominantly female. Two-thirds experienced generalized AD or panic disorder, and almost 20% had psychological comorbidities. The treatment with several drugs was more frequent than monotherapy, consisting mainly in the combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and a complex homeopathic drug (27.3%). The clinical evaluation was favourable, defined by a statically significant decrease in anxiety, but with no differences between the combinations of treatments.

Conclusions

PC physicians who are familiar with the use of homeopathic agents already use them as a complementary therapeutic option in the management of AD. According to the favourable clinical results achieved with single as well as combined therapy, this clinical practice should be integrated into the management of AD in PC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信