Caiyun Nie , Weifeng Xu , Beibei Chen , Huifang Lv , Jianzheng Wang , Yingjun Liu , Yunduan He , Saiqi Wang , Jing Zhao , Xiaobing Chen
{"title":"三氟吡啶/替吡拉西单药联合贝伐单抗或免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性结直肠癌癌症的临床研究","authors":"Caiyun Nie , Weifeng Xu , Beibei Chen , Huifang Lv , Jianzheng Wang , Yingjun Liu , Yunduan He , Saiqi Wang , Jing Zhao , Xiaobing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) has achieved modest efficacy in the late-line treatment of </span>metastatic colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and </span>drug toxicities of TAS-102 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>From October 2020 to February 2022, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed from 2 or more lines of prior therapy and treated with TAS-102 monotherapy, in combination with </span>bevacizumab<span> or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were analyzed. The evaluation indicators were </span></span>progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate , disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and drug toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 70 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate and DCR were 1.4% and 68.6%. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 (95% CI: 4.1-7.9) and 10.0 (95% CI: 8.3-11.7) months. Compared with TAS-102 monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab obtained superior DCR (75.9% vs. 50% vs. 40%, <em>P</em> = .047), PFS (6.3m vs. 3.0 m vs. 3.0 m, <em>P</em> = .041) and OS (12.0 m vs. 6.5 m vs. 6.0m, <em>P</em><span><span> = .013). Patients without prior regorafenib or </span>fruquintinib therapy obtained better median PFS (6.3 vs. 4.3 m, </span><em>P</em> = .031) and OS (NR vs. 9.0 m, <em>P</em><span><span> = .036). Other indicators, including age, tumor site, KRAS status and use of fluoropyrimidine as last regimen before TAS-102, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102. The most frequent adverse events were </span>leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In real-world clinical setting, TAS-102 showed consistent clinical efficacy and manageable safety with previous prospective clinical studies. Compared with monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab demonstrated better clinical efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":"22 1","pages":"Pages 76-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploration of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy and in Combination With Bevacizumab or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study\",\"authors\":\"Caiyun Nie , Weifeng Xu , Beibei Chen , Huifang Lv , Jianzheng Wang , Yingjun Liu , Yunduan He , Saiqi Wang , Jing Zhao , Xiaobing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) has achieved modest efficacy in the late-line treatment of </span>metastatic colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and </span>drug toxicities of TAS-102 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>From October 2020 to February 2022, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed from 2 or more lines of prior therapy and treated with TAS-102 monotherapy, in combination with </span>bevacizumab<span> or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were analyzed. The evaluation indicators were </span></span>progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate , disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and drug toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 70 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate and DCR were 1.4% and 68.6%. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 (95% CI: 4.1-7.9) and 10.0 (95% CI: 8.3-11.7) months. Compared with TAS-102 monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab obtained superior DCR (75.9% vs. 50% vs. 40%, <em>P</em> = .047), PFS (6.3m vs. 3.0 m vs. 3.0 m, <em>P</em> = .041) and OS (12.0 m vs. 6.5 m vs. 6.0m, <em>P</em><span><span> = .013). Patients without prior regorafenib or </span>fruquintinib therapy obtained better median PFS (6.3 vs. 4.3 m, </span><em>P</em> = .031) and OS (NR vs. 9.0 m, <em>P</em><span><span> = .036). Other indicators, including age, tumor site, KRAS status and use of fluoropyrimidine as last regimen before TAS-102, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102. The most frequent adverse events were </span>leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In real-world clinical setting, TAS-102 showed consistent clinical efficacy and manageable safety with previous prospective clinical studies. Compared with monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab demonstrated better clinical efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 76-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002822001311\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002822001311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Exploration of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy and in Combination With Bevacizumab or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study
Background
Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) has achieved modest efficacy in the late-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and drug toxicities of TAS-102 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical setting.
Methods
From October 2020 to February 2022, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed from 2 or more lines of prior therapy and treated with TAS-102 monotherapy, in combination with bevacizumab or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were analyzed. The evaluation indicators were progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate , disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and drug toxicities.
Results
A total of 70 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate and DCR were 1.4% and 68.6%. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 (95% CI: 4.1-7.9) and 10.0 (95% CI: 8.3-11.7) months. Compared with TAS-102 monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab obtained superior DCR (75.9% vs. 50% vs. 40%, P = .047), PFS (6.3m vs. 3.0 m vs. 3.0 m, P = .041) and OS (12.0 m vs. 6.5 m vs. 6.0m, P = .013). Patients without prior regorafenib or fruquintinib therapy obtained better median PFS (6.3 vs. 4.3 m, P = .031) and OS (NR vs. 9.0 m, P = .036). Other indicators, including age, tumor site, KRAS status and use of fluoropyrimidine as last regimen before TAS-102, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102. The most frequent adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting.
Conclusion
In real-world clinical setting, TAS-102 showed consistent clinical efficacy and manageable safety with previous prospective clinical studies. Compared with monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab demonstrated better clinical efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.