新自由主义之后:新自由主义之后:过渡期的社会理论和社会学》。

Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s12108-022-09562-z
Robert J Antonio
{"title":"新自由主义之后:新自由主义之后:过渡期的社会理论和社会学》。","authors":"Robert J Antonio","doi":"10.1007/s12108-022-09562-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Charles Thorpe argues sociology lacks a \"language of society as a whole.\" He holds that positivist sociologists de-legitimated holistic theories or broad normatively oriented \"social theories,\" leaving the discipline without discursive means to critically assess and deliberate its overall directions and those of society. Thorpe does not address holistic theory directly or explain how it differs analytically from standard \"sociological theory.\" My intent is to clarify these matters by extending facets of his argument to illuminate the interdependence between holistic theorizing and empirical-historical social science, which is necessary to create the type of \"reflexive sociology\" that Thorpe argues would make sociology more cosmopolitan and capable of addressing the turbulent sociopolitical conditions in the interregnum after neoliberalism.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After Neoliberalism: Social Theory and Sociology in the Interregnum.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Antonio\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12108-022-09562-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Charles Thorpe argues sociology lacks a \\\"language of society as a whole.\\\" He holds that positivist sociologists de-legitimated holistic theories or broad normatively oriented \\\"social theories,\\\" leaving the discipline without discursive means to critically assess and deliberate its overall directions and those of society. Thorpe does not address holistic theory directly or explain how it differs analytically from standard \\\"sociological theory.\\\" My intent is to clarify these matters by extending facets of his argument to illuminate the interdependence between holistic theorizing and empirical-historical social science, which is necessary to create the type of \\\"reflexive sociology\\\" that Thorpe argues would make sociology more cosmopolitan and capable of addressing the turbulent sociopolitical conditions in the interregnum after neoliberalism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-022-09562-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-022-09562-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

查尔斯-索普(Charles Thorpe)认为,社会学缺乏 "社会整体语言"。他认为,实证主义社会学家将整体理论或广泛的规范导向的 "社会理论 "去合法化,使这门学科缺乏批判性的手段来评估和审议其整体方向和社会方向。索普没有直接论述整体理论,也没有解释整体理论在分析上与标准的 "社会学理论 "有何不同。我的意图是通过扩展其论点的各个方面来澄清这些问题,从而阐明整体理论化与实证-历史社会科学之间的相互依存关系,这对于创建索普所认为的那种 "反思性社会学 "是必要的,这种社会学将使社会学更具世界性,并能够应对新自由主义之后动荡的社会政治状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
After Neoliberalism: Social Theory and Sociology in the Interregnum.

Charles Thorpe argues sociology lacks a "language of society as a whole." He holds that positivist sociologists de-legitimated holistic theories or broad normatively oriented "social theories," leaving the discipline without discursive means to critically assess and deliberate its overall directions and those of society. Thorpe does not address holistic theory directly or explain how it differs analytically from standard "sociological theory." My intent is to clarify these matters by extending facets of his argument to illuminate the interdependence between holistic theorizing and empirical-historical social science, which is necessary to create the type of "reflexive sociology" that Thorpe argues would make sociology more cosmopolitan and capable of addressing the turbulent sociopolitical conditions in the interregnum after neoliberalism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信