溶液成本是否会影响隐形眼镜佩戴者的依从性?

MSc, FBCO, DCLP Gillian M. Sheard, BSc, PhD, FAAO, FVCO, MBCO Nathan Efyon (Professor of Clinical Optometry, Director of Eurolens Research), BSc, MBCO Bridget E. Claydon
{"title":"溶液成本是否会影响隐形眼镜佩戴者的依从性?","authors":"MSc, FBCO, DCLP Gillian M. Sheard,&nbsp;BSc, PhD, FAAO, FVCO, MBCO Nathan Efyon (Professor of Clinical Optometry, Director of Eurolens Research),&nbsp;BSc, MBCO Bridget E. Claydon","doi":"10.1016/S0141-7037(95)80034-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A study was undertaken to establish whether contact lens patients are likely to be more compliant with their lens careregimes if they pay a fair and proper price for their health goods because the worth' of these goods is reinforced. Fifty-nine patients were recruited into two groups (‘nominal’ or ‘ful’ pay). After 4 months the amount of solution actually used was compared with the estimated amount. More cleaning solution was actually used by patients in the ‘nominal pay’ group, but less saline and protein remover tablets were actually used by patients in both groups (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). Corneal staining was significantly more apparent in the ‘nominal pay’ group (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). Eight aspects of lens hygiene were assessed. Only 11 % of patients were compliant in all aspects but no statistically significant difference was found between patients in the two groups. In this short-term study, cost did not appear to affect the level of compliance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","volume":"18 2","pages":"Pages 59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(95)80034-4","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does solution cost affect compliance among contact lens wearers?\",\"authors\":\"MSc, FBCO, DCLP Gillian M. Sheard,&nbsp;BSc, PhD, FAAO, FVCO, MBCO Nathan Efyon (Professor of Clinical Optometry, Director of Eurolens Research),&nbsp;BSc, MBCO Bridget E. Claydon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0141-7037(95)80034-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A study was undertaken to establish whether contact lens patients are likely to be more compliant with their lens careregimes if they pay a fair and proper price for their health goods because the worth' of these goods is reinforced. Fifty-nine patients were recruited into two groups (‘nominal’ or ‘ful’ pay). After 4 months the amount of solution actually used was compared with the estimated amount. More cleaning solution was actually used by patients in the ‘nominal pay’ group, but less saline and protein remover tablets were actually used by patients in both groups (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). Corneal staining was significantly more apparent in the ‘nominal pay’ group (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). Eight aspects of lens hygiene were assessed. Only 11 % of patients were compliant in all aspects but no statistically significant difference was found between patients in the two groups. In this short-term study, cost did not appear to affect the level of compliance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(95)80034-4\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703795800344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703795800344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

我们进行了一项研究,以确定如果隐形眼镜患者支付公平合理的价格购买健康产品,是否会因为这些产品的价值得到加强而更有可能遵守他们的隐形眼镜护理方案。59名患者被分为两组(“名义”和“全额”薪酬)。4个月后,将实际使用的溶液量与估计值进行比较。“名义支付”组的患者实际使用了更多的清洗液,但两组患者实际使用的生理盐水和蛋白去除片较少(P<0.05)。角膜染色在“名义支付”组中更为明显(P<0.05)。对晶状体卫生进行八个方面的评估。只有11%的患者在各方面都是依从性的,但两组患者之间没有统计学差异。在这项短期研究中,费用似乎没有影响依从性的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does solution cost affect compliance among contact lens wearers?

A study was undertaken to establish whether contact lens patients are likely to be more compliant with their lens careregimes if they pay a fair and proper price for their health goods because the worth' of these goods is reinforced. Fifty-nine patients were recruited into two groups (‘nominal’ or ‘ful’ pay). After 4 months the amount of solution actually used was compared with the estimated amount. More cleaning solution was actually used by patients in the ‘nominal pay’ group, but less saline and protein remover tablets were actually used by patients in both groups (P<0.05). Corneal staining was significantly more apparent in the ‘nominal pay’ group (P<0.05). Eight aspects of lens hygiene were assessed. Only 11 % of patients were compliant in all aspects but no statistically significant difference was found between patients in the two groups. In this short-term study, cost did not appear to affect the level of compliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信