S. Kanao, M. Kataoka, M. Iima, A. Ohno, Rena Sakaguchi, Akane Ohashi, M. Honda, M. Toi, David APorter Kaori Togashi
{"title":"使用读数分段EPI和单次EPI的乳房高分辨率弥散加权MRI","authors":"S. Kanao, M. Kataoka, M. Iima, A. Ohno, Rena Sakaguchi, Akane Ohashi, M. Honda, M. Toi, David APorter Kaori Togashi","doi":"10.14303/IMAGING-MEDICINE.1000083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Compared to dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), image quality in diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI) is generally poor because of low image spatial resolution and distortion. Readout-segmented EPI (RS-EPI) is a recently-developed technique to obtain high resolution DW-MRI with less distortion. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of high-resolution DW-MRI of the breast, using RS-EPI and single-shot EPI (SS-EPI). Methods: With IRB approval, 26 patients with clinically suspected breast cancer were prospectively enrolled. Breast MRI was performed on a 3.0 T scanner using a 16-channel breast coil. Sequences include T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) with fat saturation, a 3D DCE-MRI series and DW-MRI (b values of 0 and 850 s/mm2 for RS-EPI and SS-EPI). To evaluate image distortion, the antero-posterior (AP) extent of the mammary gland on DW-MRI with RS-EPI and SS-EPI were measured and differences from values obtained from T2WI were calculated. The artefacts on both sequences were scored. Diagnostic performance of lesions on both sequences was assessed using BI-RADS classification and the category was compared to that determined by DCE-MRI. Results: The average difference in the measured AP extent on DW-MRI with RS-EPI was significantly less than that on DW-MRI with SS-EPI (2.3 ± 2.0 versus 12.5 ± 4.7 mm, respectively, p<0.01). Distortion artefacts were significantly lower on DW-MRI with RS-EPI than that with SS-EPI in all cases. The sensitivity of DW-MRI with RS-EPI was higher than that with SS-EPI (88.9 and 77.8%, respectively). Conclusion: DW-MRI with RS-EPI has an advantage of less distortion compared to that with SS-EPI.","PeriodicalId":13333,"journal":{"name":"Imaging in Medicine","volume":"63 7","pages":"185-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast using readout-segmented EPI and single-shot EPI\",\"authors\":\"S. Kanao, M. Kataoka, M. Iima, A. Ohno, Rena Sakaguchi, Akane Ohashi, M. Honda, M. Toi, David APorter Kaori Togashi\",\"doi\":\"10.14303/IMAGING-MEDICINE.1000083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Compared to dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), image quality in diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI) is generally poor because of low image spatial resolution and distortion. Readout-segmented EPI (RS-EPI) is a recently-developed technique to obtain high resolution DW-MRI with less distortion. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of high-resolution DW-MRI of the breast, using RS-EPI and single-shot EPI (SS-EPI). Methods: With IRB approval, 26 patients with clinically suspected breast cancer were prospectively enrolled. Breast MRI was performed on a 3.0 T scanner using a 16-channel breast coil. Sequences include T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) with fat saturation, a 3D DCE-MRI series and DW-MRI (b values of 0 and 850 s/mm2 for RS-EPI and SS-EPI). To evaluate image distortion, the antero-posterior (AP) extent of the mammary gland on DW-MRI with RS-EPI and SS-EPI were measured and differences from values obtained from T2WI were calculated. The artefacts on both sequences were scored. Diagnostic performance of lesions on both sequences was assessed using BI-RADS classification and the category was compared to that determined by DCE-MRI. Results: The average difference in the measured AP extent on DW-MRI with RS-EPI was significantly less than that on DW-MRI with SS-EPI (2.3 ± 2.0 versus 12.5 ± 4.7 mm, respectively, p<0.01). Distortion artefacts were significantly lower on DW-MRI with RS-EPI than that with SS-EPI in all cases. The sensitivity of DW-MRI with RS-EPI was higher than that with SS-EPI (88.9 and 77.8%, respectively). Conclusion: DW-MRI with RS-EPI has an advantage of less distortion compared to that with SS-EPI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"63 7\",\"pages\":\"185-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14303/IMAGING-MEDICINE.1000083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14303/IMAGING-MEDICINE.1000083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
目的:与动态对比增强MRI (DCE-MRI)相比,弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)的图像质量普遍较差,主要是由于图像空间分辨率低和失真。读数分割EPI (RS-EPI)是近年来发展起来的一种获得低失真高分辨率DW-MRI的技术。本研究旨在评估采用RS-EPI和单次EPI (SS-EPI)对乳房进行高分辨率dw mri的可行性。方法:经IRB批准,前瞻性纳入26例临床疑似乳腺癌患者。在3.0 T扫描仪上使用16通道乳房线圈进行乳房MRI。序列包括脂肪饱和度的t2加权成像(T2WI), 3D DCE-MRI系列和DW-MRI (RS-EPI和SS-EPI的b值分别为0和850 s/mm2)。为了评估图像失真,我们测量了DW-MRI (RS-EPI和SS-EPI)上乳腺的前后(AP)范围,并计算了与T2WI所得值的差异。对两个序列上的伪影进行评分。使用BI-RADS分类评估两个序列的病变诊断性能,并将分类与DCE-MRI确定的分类进行比较。结果:DW-MRI结合RS-EPI与DW-MRI结合SS-EPI测量AP范围的平均差异显著小于DW-MRI(分别为2.3±2.0 mm与12.5±4.7 mm, p<0.01)。在所有病例中,使用RS-EPI的DW-MRI的畸变伪影明显低于SS-EPI。RS-EPI对DW-MRI的敏感性高于SS-EPI(分别为88.9和77.8%)。结论:与SS-EPI相比,RS-EPI的DW-MRI具有畸变较小的优势。
High-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast using readout-segmented EPI and single-shot EPI
Objective: Compared to dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), image quality in diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI) is generally poor because of low image spatial resolution and distortion. Readout-segmented EPI (RS-EPI) is a recently-developed technique to obtain high resolution DW-MRI with less distortion. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of high-resolution DW-MRI of the breast, using RS-EPI and single-shot EPI (SS-EPI). Methods: With IRB approval, 26 patients with clinically suspected breast cancer were prospectively enrolled. Breast MRI was performed on a 3.0 T scanner using a 16-channel breast coil. Sequences include T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) with fat saturation, a 3D DCE-MRI series and DW-MRI (b values of 0 and 850 s/mm2 for RS-EPI and SS-EPI). To evaluate image distortion, the antero-posterior (AP) extent of the mammary gland on DW-MRI with RS-EPI and SS-EPI were measured and differences from values obtained from T2WI were calculated. The artefacts on both sequences were scored. Diagnostic performance of lesions on both sequences was assessed using BI-RADS classification and the category was compared to that determined by DCE-MRI. Results: The average difference in the measured AP extent on DW-MRI with RS-EPI was significantly less than that on DW-MRI with SS-EPI (2.3 ± 2.0 versus 12.5 ± 4.7 mm, respectively, p<0.01). Distortion artefacts were significantly lower on DW-MRI with RS-EPI than that with SS-EPI in all cases. The sensitivity of DW-MRI with RS-EPI was higher than that with SS-EPI (88.9 and 77.8%, respectively). Conclusion: DW-MRI with RS-EPI has an advantage of less distortion compared to that with SS-EPI.