基于深度学习的基于基本血液测试数据和nirs测量的脑血流动力学的认知功能预测

K. Oyama, K. Sakatani
{"title":"基于深度学习的基于基本血液测试数据和nirs测量的脑血流动力学的认知功能预测","authors":"K. Oyama, K. Sakatani","doi":"10.1109/icdh52753.2021.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, we demonstrated that deep learning allows the prediction of cognitive function using basic blood test data. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of deep learning-based predictions of cognitive function by comparing basic blood test data and cerebral hemodynamics as measured by time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy (TNIRS) as input data for the model. First, we used a linear regression model, random forest, and a deep neural network as contemporary machine learning regression models. We studied 202 participants to assess cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination and analyzed TNIRS-measured cerebral hemodynamics, including absolute concentrations of hemoglobin, regional oxygen saturation, and optical pathlength in the bilateral prefrontal cortices at rest. The results suggested that prediction using both TNIRS and blood data inputs exhibited lower mean absolute and mean absolute percentage errors. We also confirmed that the blood test data are often useful; however, a sufficient combination, including blood counts, electrolytes, and nutrition, is required for clinical use.","PeriodicalId":93401,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH)","volume":"2006 2","pages":"218-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-based Prediction of Cognitive Function Using Basic Blood Test Data and NIRS-measured Cerebral Hemodynamics\",\"authors\":\"K. Oyama, K. Sakatani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/icdh52753.2021.00040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, we demonstrated that deep learning allows the prediction of cognitive function using basic blood test data. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of deep learning-based predictions of cognitive function by comparing basic blood test data and cerebral hemodynamics as measured by time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy (TNIRS) as input data for the model. First, we used a linear regression model, random forest, and a deep neural network as contemporary machine learning regression models. We studied 202 participants to assess cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination and analyzed TNIRS-measured cerebral hemodynamics, including absolute concentrations of hemoglobin, regional oxygen saturation, and optical pathlength in the bilateral prefrontal cortices at rest. The results suggested that prediction using both TNIRS and blood data inputs exhibited lower mean absolute and mean absolute percentage errors. We also confirmed that the blood test data are often useful; however, a sufficient combination, including blood counts, electrolytes, and nutrition, is required for clinical use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH)\",\"volume\":\"2006 2\",\"pages\":\"218-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/icdh52753.2021.00040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icdh52753.2021.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,我们证明了深度学习可以使用基本的血液测试数据来预测认知功能。在这项研究中,我们通过比较基本血液测试数据和脑血流动力学,评估了基于深度学习的认知功能预测的准确性,这些数据是由时间分辨近红外光谱(TNIRS)作为模型的输入数据测量的。首先,我们使用线性回归模型、随机森林和深度神经网络作为当代机器学习回归模型。我们研究了202名参与者,使用迷你精神状态检查来评估认知功能,并分析了tnirs测量的脑血流动力学,包括血红蛋白绝对浓度、区域氧饱和度和静止时双侧前额皮质的光路长度。结果表明,使用TNIRS和血液数据输入的预测显示出较低的平均绝对百分比和平均绝对百分比误差。我们还证实,血液检测数据通常是有用的;然而,临床使用需要充分的组合,包括血球计数,电解质和营养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning-based Prediction of Cognitive Function Using Basic Blood Test Data and NIRS-measured Cerebral Hemodynamics
Recently, we demonstrated that deep learning allows the prediction of cognitive function using basic blood test data. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of deep learning-based predictions of cognitive function by comparing basic blood test data and cerebral hemodynamics as measured by time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy (TNIRS) as input data for the model. First, we used a linear regression model, random forest, and a deep neural network as contemporary machine learning regression models. We studied 202 participants to assess cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination and analyzed TNIRS-measured cerebral hemodynamics, including absolute concentrations of hemoglobin, regional oxygen saturation, and optical pathlength in the bilateral prefrontal cortices at rest. The results suggested that prediction using both TNIRS and blood data inputs exhibited lower mean absolute and mean absolute percentage errors. We also confirmed that the blood test data are often useful; however, a sufficient combination, including blood counts, electrolytes, and nutrition, is required for clinical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信