宫腔镜麻醉处理方法的比较

V. Petrychenko, R. Tkachenko
{"title":"宫腔镜麻醉处理方法的比较","authors":"V. Petrychenko, R. Tkachenko","doi":"10.30841/2708-8731.3.2023.283323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective: to evaluate and improve the existing methods of anesthetic support during hysteroscopy.Materials and methods. In 2021-2022 years, 40 patients who had operative treatment – hysteroscopy, were examined in the municipal non-commercial enterprise “Kyiv City Center of Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine”. The exclusion criterion was the presence of concomitant diseases (hypertension, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, bronchial asthma, etc.).All patients were randomly divided into two groups depending on the chosen method of anesthesia. In the 1st group, standard total intravenous anesthesia was performed and premedication with nefopam and paracetamol was used for the improvement the anesthetic support and compare the results in the 2nd group.The hemodynamic indicators of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured to objectify the level of the pain syndrome, oxygen saturation in the blood was measured also. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire.Results. It was established that the anesthetic support of the 1st group of patients was accompanied by a significant (p<0.05) increase of hemodynamic indicators at the stage of the beginning of the operation versus the indicators of the 2nd group: SBP – by 13.77%; DBP – by 11.92%, MAP – by 13.08%. After the end of anesthesia (awakening), an increased blood pressure was registered in the 1st group, which had a significant difference with similar indicators of the 2nd group, namely: SBP by 22.33%, DBP – by 19.05%, MAP – by 20.51%.Heart rate in the 1st group after the installation of a laryngeal mask (induction of anesthesia) was higher by 12.85% (p<0.05) than in the 2nd group. Heart rate was also higher upon awakening in the 1st group – by 16.03% (р<0.05) than in patients of the 2nd group. In the 2nd group, the maximum VAS score in 30 minutes after waking up was 0.9±0.11 points, which did not require additional analgesia, while in the 1st group this score was 3.86±0.20 points.20% of patients who were not premedicated with nefopam and paracetamol, in 30 minutes after surgery had vomiting, which was not present in the group where premedication was performed.Conclusions. Premedication with nefopam and paracetamol as the additional analgesics can prevent the development of pain sensations in the postoperative period and reduce the incidence of vomiting. The use of a laryngeal mask during artificial lung ventilation ensured adequate tightness of the connection of the respiratory tract with the circuit of the anesthesia machine.","PeriodicalId":21003,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive health of woman","volume":"21 5-6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of methods of anesthetic management in hysteroscopy\",\"authors\":\"V. Petrychenko, R. Tkachenko\",\"doi\":\"10.30841/2708-8731.3.2023.283323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective: to evaluate and improve the existing methods of anesthetic support during hysteroscopy.Materials and methods. In 2021-2022 years, 40 patients who had operative treatment – hysteroscopy, were examined in the municipal non-commercial enterprise “Kyiv City Center of Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine”. The exclusion criterion was the presence of concomitant diseases (hypertension, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, bronchial asthma, etc.).All patients were randomly divided into two groups depending on the chosen method of anesthesia. In the 1st group, standard total intravenous anesthesia was performed and premedication with nefopam and paracetamol was used for the improvement the anesthetic support and compare the results in the 2nd group.The hemodynamic indicators of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured to objectify the level of the pain syndrome, oxygen saturation in the blood was measured also. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire.Results. It was established that the anesthetic support of the 1st group of patients was accompanied by a significant (p<0.05) increase of hemodynamic indicators at the stage of the beginning of the operation versus the indicators of the 2nd group: SBP – by 13.77%; DBP – by 11.92%, MAP – by 13.08%. After the end of anesthesia (awakening), an increased blood pressure was registered in the 1st group, which had a significant difference with similar indicators of the 2nd group, namely: SBP by 22.33%, DBP – by 19.05%, MAP – by 20.51%.Heart rate in the 1st group after the installation of a laryngeal mask (induction of anesthesia) was higher by 12.85% (p<0.05) than in the 2nd group. Heart rate was also higher upon awakening in the 1st group – by 16.03% (р<0.05) than in patients of the 2nd group. In the 2nd group, the maximum VAS score in 30 minutes after waking up was 0.9±0.11 points, which did not require additional analgesia, while in the 1st group this score was 3.86±0.20 points.20% of patients who were not premedicated with nefopam and paracetamol, in 30 minutes after surgery had vomiting, which was not present in the group where premedication was performed.Conclusions. Premedication with nefopam and paracetamol as the additional analgesics can prevent the development of pain sensations in the postoperative period and reduce the incidence of vomiting. The use of a laryngeal mask during artificial lung ventilation ensured adequate tightness of the connection of the respiratory tract with the circuit of the anesthesia machine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive health of woman\",\"volume\":\"21 5-6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive health of woman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.3.2023.283323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive health of woman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.3.2023.283323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和改进现有宫腔镜麻醉支持方法。材料和方法。在2021年至2022年期间,在市政非商业企业“基辅市生殖和围产期医学中心”对40例手术治疗-宫腔镜患者进行了检查。排除标准为合并疾病(高血压、1型和2型糖尿病、支气管哮喘等)。根据麻醉方式的不同,将所有患者随机分为两组。第一组采用标准静脉全麻,前用药奈福泮和扑热息痛改善麻醉支持,并与第二组进行比较。测量心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)等血流动力学指标,客观判断疼痛综合征的程度,同时测定血氧饱和度。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行评估。结果表明,第一组患者在麻醉支持下,术初血流动力学指标较第二组提高13.77% (p<0.05);DBP下降11.92%,MAP下降13.08%。麻醉结束(苏醒)后,第一组患者血压升高,与第二组相似指标SBP升高22.33%,DBP -升高19.05%,MAP -升高20.51%,差异有统计学意义。第一组在喉罩(诱导麻醉)后心率比第二组高12.85% (p<0.05)。第一组醒来时心率也比第二组高16.03% (p <0.05)。第二组患者醒后30分钟VAS评分最高为0.9±0.11分,不需额外镇痛;第一组患者醒后30分钟VAS评分最高为3.86±0.20分。在手术后30分钟内,未预先使用奈福泮和扑热息痛的患者中有20%出现呕吐,而在预先使用药物的患者中没有出现呕吐。术前加用尼福泮和扑热息痛作为镇痛药,可防止术后疼痛感的发生,减少呕吐的发生。在人工肺通气时使用喉罩确保呼吸道与麻醉机电路的连接足够紧密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of methods of anesthetic management in hysteroscopy
The objective: to evaluate and improve the existing methods of anesthetic support during hysteroscopy.Materials and methods. In 2021-2022 years, 40 patients who had operative treatment – hysteroscopy, were examined in the municipal non-commercial enterprise “Kyiv City Center of Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine”. The exclusion criterion was the presence of concomitant diseases (hypertension, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, bronchial asthma, etc.).All patients were randomly divided into two groups depending on the chosen method of anesthesia. In the 1st group, standard total intravenous anesthesia was performed and premedication with nefopam and paracetamol was used for the improvement the anesthetic support and compare the results in the 2nd group.The hemodynamic indicators of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured to objectify the level of the pain syndrome, oxygen saturation in the blood was measured also. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire.Results. It was established that the anesthetic support of the 1st group of patients was accompanied by a significant (p<0.05) increase of hemodynamic indicators at the stage of the beginning of the operation versus the indicators of the 2nd group: SBP – by 13.77%; DBP – by 11.92%, MAP – by 13.08%. After the end of anesthesia (awakening), an increased blood pressure was registered in the 1st group, which had a significant difference with similar indicators of the 2nd group, namely: SBP by 22.33%, DBP – by 19.05%, MAP – by 20.51%.Heart rate in the 1st group after the installation of a laryngeal mask (induction of anesthesia) was higher by 12.85% (p<0.05) than in the 2nd group. Heart rate was also higher upon awakening in the 1st group – by 16.03% (р<0.05) than in patients of the 2nd group. In the 2nd group, the maximum VAS score in 30 minutes after waking up was 0.9±0.11 points, which did not require additional analgesia, while in the 1st group this score was 3.86±0.20 points.20% of patients who were not premedicated with nefopam and paracetamol, in 30 minutes after surgery had vomiting, which was not present in the group where premedication was performed.Conclusions. Premedication with nefopam and paracetamol as the additional analgesics can prevent the development of pain sensations in the postoperative period and reduce the incidence of vomiting. The use of a laryngeal mask during artificial lung ventilation ensured adequate tightness of the connection of the respiratory tract with the circuit of the anesthesia machine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信