如何在S-ICD植入前更好地识别高危不适当电击患者:来自多中心经验的结果

M. Ben Kilani, P. Jacon, N. Badenco, C. Marquié, P. Ollitrault, N. Béhar, P. Khattar, A. Carabelli, S. Venier, P. Defaye
{"title":"如何在S-ICD植入前更好地识别高危不适当电击患者:来自多中心经验的结果","authors":"M. Ben Kilani, P. Jacon, N. Badenco, C. Marquié, P. Ollitrault, N. Béhar, P. Khattar, A. Carabelli, S. Venier, P. Defaye","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n \n \n \n Despite the recent improvements, inappropriate shocks (IAS) in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) remain a challenge in \"real-life\" practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the preoperative predictive factors of IAS with the latest generation of S-ICD, with a particular focus on data obtained during the screening procedure.\n \n \n \n Between January 2017 and March 2020, 300 patients implanted with Generation 3 S-ICD system for primary and secondary prevention were included in this multicentric study. Follow-up (FU) of at least 6 months and preoperative screening procedure data were mandatory for all patients.\n \n \n \n After a mean follow-up of 22.8 (±11.4) months, appropriate therapies occurred in 12.3% patients; while 26 patients (8.7%) experienced inappropriate therapies (incidence 4.9 per 100 patient-years). The total number of inappropriate shock episodes was 48; 9 patients experienced multiple episodes. Causes of IAS were: supraventricular arrhythmias (34.6%), cardiac (30.7%) and extra-cardiac noise oversensing (38.4%). In univariate analysis, availability of all 3 sensing vectors during preoperative screening significantly reduced inappropriate therapies occurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.89, P=0.028). Clinical preoperative S-ICD inappropriate shocks predictors were: history of Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)(HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.45-13.47; P=0.009); overweight (BMI>25: HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.83-0.4.48; P=0.13); QRS duration (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.1-1.03; P=0.14) and lower QRS/T wave ratio in lead I (for a threshold < 3: HR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.88-10.48; P=0.001). By multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with IAS were: the availability of less than 3 sensing vectors during preoperative screening (p<0.05), a low QRS/T wave ratio in lead I (for a threshold <3; p<0.001), history of SVT (p<0.001) and overweight (BMI> 25; p<0.05).\n \n \n \n Automatic preoperative screening data is of high interest as a predictor of IAS with a quantitative value. ECG specificities in association with other clinical factors should be taken into consideration to identify patients at high risk for IAS.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to better identify patients at high risk of inappropriate shocks before S-ICD implantation: Results from a multicenter experience\",\"authors\":\"M. Ben Kilani, P. Jacon, N. Badenco, C. Marquié, P. Ollitrault, N. Béhar, P. Khattar, A. Carabelli, S. Venier, P. Defaye\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euac053.464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Type of funding sources: None.\\n \\n \\n \\n Despite the recent improvements, inappropriate shocks (IAS) in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) remain a challenge in \\\"real-life\\\" practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the preoperative predictive factors of IAS with the latest generation of S-ICD, with a particular focus on data obtained during the screening procedure.\\n \\n \\n \\n Between January 2017 and March 2020, 300 patients implanted with Generation 3 S-ICD system for primary and secondary prevention were included in this multicentric study. Follow-up (FU) of at least 6 months and preoperative screening procedure data were mandatory for all patients.\\n \\n \\n \\n After a mean follow-up of 22.8 (±11.4) months, appropriate therapies occurred in 12.3% patients; while 26 patients (8.7%) experienced inappropriate therapies (incidence 4.9 per 100 patient-years). The total number of inappropriate shock episodes was 48; 9 patients experienced multiple episodes. Causes of IAS were: supraventricular arrhythmias (34.6%), cardiac (30.7%) and extra-cardiac noise oversensing (38.4%). In univariate analysis, availability of all 3 sensing vectors during preoperative screening significantly reduced inappropriate therapies occurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.89, P=0.028). Clinical preoperative S-ICD inappropriate shocks predictors were: history of Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)(HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.45-13.47; P=0.009); overweight (BMI>25: HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.83-0.4.48; P=0.13); QRS duration (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.1-1.03; P=0.14) and lower QRS/T wave ratio in lead I (for a threshold < 3: HR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.88-10.48; P=0.001). By multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with IAS were: the availability of less than 3 sensing vectors during preoperative screening (p<0.05), a low QRS/T wave ratio in lead I (for a threshold <3; p<0.001), history of SVT (p<0.001) and overweight (BMI> 25; p<0.05).\\n \\n \\n \\n Automatic preoperative screening data is of high interest as a predictor of IAS with a quantitative value. ECG specificities in association with other clinical factors should be taken into consideration to identify patients at high risk for IAS.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"23 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资金来源类型:无。尽管最近有所改善,但在“现实生活”实践中,皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)患者的不适当电击(IAS)仍然是一个挑战。本研究的目的是评估最新一代S-ICD的IAS术前预测因素,特别关注筛查过程中获得的数据。在2017年1月至2020年3月期间,300名植入第3代S-ICD系统用于一级和二级预防的患者纳入了这项多中心研究。所有患者至少6个月的随访(FU)和术前筛查程序数据是强制性的。平均随访22.8(±11.4)个月后,12.3%的患者接受了适当的治疗;26例患者(8.7%)经历了不适当的治疗(发病率为4.9 / 100患者年)。不适当休克发作总数为48次;9例患者出现多次发作。引起IAS的原因有:室上性心律失常(34.6%)、心源性心律失常(30.7%)和心外噪声过感(38.4%)。在单因素分析中,术前筛查时所有3种传感载体的可用性显著减少了不适当治疗的发生(风险比[HR], 0.32;95%可信区间[CI], 0.12-0.89, P=0.028)。临床术前S-ICD不适当电击预测因子为:室上性心动过速(SVT)史(HR, 4.42;95% ci, 1.45-13.47;P = 0.009);超重(BMI 25: HR 1.93;95% ci, 0.83-0.4.48;P = 0.13);QRS持续时间(HR, 1.01;95% ci, 0.1-1.03;P=0.14), I型导联QRS/T波比较低(阈值< 3:HR, 4.44;95% ci, 1.88-10.48;P = 0.001)。通过多变量分析,与IAS相关的独立因素为:术前筛查时少于3个传感载体的可用性(p 25;p < 0.05)。自动术前筛查数据作为IAS的定量预测指标具有很高的价值。在识别IAS高危患者时,应考虑心电图特异性与其他临床因素的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to better identify patients at high risk of inappropriate shocks before S-ICD implantation: Results from a multicenter experience
Type of funding sources: None. Despite the recent improvements, inappropriate shocks (IAS) in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) remain a challenge in "real-life" practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the preoperative predictive factors of IAS with the latest generation of S-ICD, with a particular focus on data obtained during the screening procedure. Between January 2017 and March 2020, 300 patients implanted with Generation 3 S-ICD system for primary and secondary prevention were included in this multicentric study. Follow-up (FU) of at least 6 months and preoperative screening procedure data were mandatory for all patients. After a mean follow-up of 22.8 (±11.4) months, appropriate therapies occurred in 12.3% patients; while 26 patients (8.7%) experienced inappropriate therapies (incidence 4.9 per 100 patient-years). The total number of inappropriate shock episodes was 48; 9 patients experienced multiple episodes. Causes of IAS were: supraventricular arrhythmias (34.6%), cardiac (30.7%) and extra-cardiac noise oversensing (38.4%). In univariate analysis, availability of all 3 sensing vectors during preoperative screening significantly reduced inappropriate therapies occurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.89, P=0.028). Clinical preoperative S-ICD inappropriate shocks predictors were: history of Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)(HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.45-13.47; P=0.009); overweight (BMI>25: HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.83-0.4.48; P=0.13); QRS duration (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.1-1.03; P=0.14) and lower QRS/T wave ratio in lead I (for a threshold < 3: HR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.88-10.48; P=0.001). By multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with IAS were: the availability of less than 3 sensing vectors during preoperative screening (p<0.05), a low QRS/T wave ratio in lead I (for a threshold <3; p<0.001), history of SVT (p<0.001) and overweight (BMI> 25; p<0.05). Automatic preoperative screening data is of high interest as a predictor of IAS with a quantitative value. ECG specificities in association with other clinical factors should be taken into consideration to identify patients at high risk for IAS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信