Marta Botella , José Antonio Rubio , Noelia Peláez , Clara Tasende , María Paz Gomez , Julia Álvarez
{"title":"1型糖尿病患者转介胰岛素泵专论会诊的中期-长期结果","authors":"Marta Botella , José Antonio Rubio , Noelia Peláez , Clara Tasende , María Paz Gomez , Julia Álvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.avdiab.2014.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyse the first 69 type<!--> <!-->1 diabetes patients referred to a specialist team between 2005 and 2012 in order to evaluate the indication for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective, observational, single centre study conducted on 69 adult patients evaluated for CSII. An analysis was made on patients who did not initiate CSII (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->18) and patients who were treated with CSII (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->51). Variables included: age, gender, duration of disease, indication for CSII, HbA1c, frequency of severe hypoglycaemia events, episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis, and pump discontinuation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The main reason for not initiating CSII was patient refusal (49%), followed by improving of glycaemic control (33%) after optimising with multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy. The most common CSII indications were: suboptimal glycaemic control (49%), and suboptimal glycaemic control with frequent non-severe hypoglycaemia (27.5%). Baseline HbA1c was 8.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.5%, and there was a significant and sustained decrease of 1% over a 5 year period (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001), with this reduction being greater in patients with HbA1c ><!--> <!-->8%. The use of CSII was stopped by 5 patients (10%) after 1 to 6<!--> <!-->years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our clinical practice one in four patients evaluated for CSII did not initiate it. The switch from MDI to CSII was associated with a 1% reduction in HbA1c over 5<!--> <!-->years, being greater in patients with poor glycaemic control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100152,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Diabetología","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2014.12.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resultados a medio-largo plazo de pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 remitidos a una consulta monográfica de bombas de insulina\",\"authors\":\"Marta Botella , José Antonio Rubio , Noelia Peláez , Clara Tasende , María Paz Gomez , Julia Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avdiab.2014.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyse the first 69 type<!--> <!-->1 diabetes patients referred to a specialist team between 2005 and 2012 in order to evaluate the indication for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective, observational, single centre study conducted on 69 adult patients evaluated for CSII. An analysis was made on patients who did not initiate CSII (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->18) and patients who were treated with CSII (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->51). Variables included: age, gender, duration of disease, indication for CSII, HbA1c, frequency of severe hypoglycaemia events, episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis, and pump discontinuation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The main reason for not initiating CSII was patient refusal (49%), followed by improving of glycaemic control (33%) after optimising with multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy. The most common CSII indications were: suboptimal glycaemic control (49%), and suboptimal glycaemic control with frequent non-severe hypoglycaemia (27.5%). Baseline HbA1c was 8.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.5%, and there was a significant and sustained decrease of 1% over a 5 year period (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001), with this reduction being greater in patients with HbA1c ><!--> <!-->8%. The use of CSII was stopped by 5 patients (10%) after 1 to 6<!--> <!-->years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our clinical practice one in four patients evaluated for CSII did not initiate it. The switch from MDI to CSII was associated with a 1% reduction in HbA1c over 5<!--> <!-->years, being greater in patients with poor glycaemic control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avances en Diabetología\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2014.12.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avances en Diabetología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323014001549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Diabetología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323014001549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Resultados a medio-largo plazo de pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 remitidos a una consulta monográfica de bombas de insulina
Objective
To analyse the first 69 type 1 diabetes patients referred to a specialist team between 2005 and 2012 in order to evaluate the indication for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Methods
Retrospective, observational, single centre study conducted on 69 adult patients evaluated for CSII. An analysis was made on patients who did not initiate CSII (n = 18) and patients who were treated with CSII (n = 51). Variables included: age, gender, duration of disease, indication for CSII, HbA1c, frequency of severe hypoglycaemia events, episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis, and pump discontinuation.
Results
The main reason for not initiating CSII was patient refusal (49%), followed by improving of glycaemic control (33%) after optimising with multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy. The most common CSII indications were: suboptimal glycaemic control (49%), and suboptimal glycaemic control with frequent non-severe hypoglycaemia (27.5%). Baseline HbA1c was 8.6 ± 1.5%, and there was a significant and sustained decrease of 1% over a 5 year period (P < .001), with this reduction being greater in patients with HbA1c > 8%. The use of CSII was stopped by 5 patients (10%) after 1 to 6 years.
Conclusion
In our clinical practice one in four patients evaluated for CSII did not initiate it. The switch from MDI to CSII was associated with a 1% reduction in HbA1c over 5 years, being greater in patients with poor glycaemic control.