新的AQM孩子在块:CoDel和PIE的实验评估

Naeem Khademi, David Ros, M. Welzl
{"title":"新的AQM孩子在块:CoDel和PIE的实验评估","authors":"Naeem Khademi, David Ros, M. Welzl","doi":"10.1109/INFCOMW.2014.6849173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active Queue Management (AQM) design has again come into the spotlight of network operators, vendors and OS developers. This reflects the growing concern and sensitivity about the end-to-end latency perceived by today's Internet users. CoDel and PIE are two AQM mechanisms that have recently been presented and discussed in the IRTF and the IETF as solutions for keeping latency low. To the best of our knowledge, they have so far only been evaluated or compared against each other using default parameter settings, which naturally presents a rather limited view of their operational range. We set thus to perform a broader experimental evaluation using real-world implementations in a wired testbed. We have in addition compared them with a decade-old variant of RED called Adaptive RED, which shares with CoDel and PIE the goal of “knob-free” operation. Surprisingly, in several instances results were favorable towards Adaptive RED.","PeriodicalId":6468,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)","volume":"37 2","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The new AQM kids on the block: An experimental evaluation of CoDel and PIE\",\"authors\":\"Naeem Khademi, David Ros, M. Welzl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFCOMW.2014.6849173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Active Queue Management (AQM) design has again come into the spotlight of network operators, vendors and OS developers. This reflects the growing concern and sensitivity about the end-to-end latency perceived by today's Internet users. CoDel and PIE are two AQM mechanisms that have recently been presented and discussed in the IRTF and the IETF as solutions for keeping latency low. To the best of our knowledge, they have so far only been evaluated or compared against each other using default parameter settings, which naturally presents a rather limited view of their operational range. We set thus to perform a broader experimental evaluation using real-world implementations in a wired testbed. We have in addition compared them with a decade-old variant of RED called Adaptive RED, which shares with CoDel and PIE the goal of “knob-free” operation. Surprisingly, in several instances results were favorable towards Adaptive RED.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"85-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2014.6849173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2014.6849173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

主动队列管理(AQM)设计再次成为网络运营商、供应商和操作系统开发商关注的焦点。这反映了当今互联网用户对端到端延迟的日益关注和敏感。CoDel和PIE是最近在IRTF和IETF中提出和讨论的两种AQM机制,作为保持低延迟的解决方案。据我们所知,到目前为止,它们只是使用默认参数设置进行评估或相互比较,这自然会对它们的操作范围产生相当有限的看法。因此,我们设置在有线测试台上使用真实世界的实现来执行更广泛的实验评估。此外,我们还将它们与十年前的RED变体Adaptive RED进行了比较,该变体与CoDel和PIE具有“无旋钮”操作的目标。令人惊讶的是,在一些情况下,结果有利于Adaptive RED。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The new AQM kids on the block: An experimental evaluation of CoDel and PIE
Active Queue Management (AQM) design has again come into the spotlight of network operators, vendors and OS developers. This reflects the growing concern and sensitivity about the end-to-end latency perceived by today's Internet users. CoDel and PIE are two AQM mechanisms that have recently been presented and discussed in the IRTF and the IETF as solutions for keeping latency low. To the best of our knowledge, they have so far only been evaluated or compared against each other using default parameter settings, which naturally presents a rather limited view of their operational range. We set thus to perform a broader experimental evaluation using real-world implementations in a wired testbed. We have in addition compared them with a decade-old variant of RED called Adaptive RED, which shares with CoDel and PIE the goal of “knob-free” operation. Surprisingly, in several instances results were favorable towards Adaptive RED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信