职业性化学致癌

J. Huff, R. Melnick
{"title":"职业性化学致癌","authors":"J. Huff, R. Melnick","doi":"10.1002/0471435139.TOX004.PUB2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancer is not a single disease, but rather is a general term applied to a multitude of diseases and stages of disease, each of clonal origin, that elicit uncontrollable tissue growth. There are more than 100 different types of cancer. In normal tissue the balance between cell reproduction and cell death determines the ultimate size of an organ. This balance is clearly represented after partial hepatectomy where, following removal of as much as two-thirds of the liver, regeneration results in restoration of the liver to its original size. If a normal cell incurs a defect in its growth regulating processes and acquires a growth advantage over other cells in a particular tissue or organ, it may multiply out of control producing a mass of altered cells; this abnormal overgrowth of new tissue is called a tumor or neoplasm. \n \n \n \nThe multistep process of carcinogenesis is thought to involve at least four stages: (1) initiation—the induction of a heritable change in a cell resulting from DNA damage (from endogenous processes or by a DNA reactive environmental agent or its metabolites) that can lead to point mutations, insertions, deletions, or chromosomal aberrations; (2) promotion—the clonal expansion of the initiated cell population; (3) progression—the process whereby benign neoplasms become malignant, as a consequence of increased genomic instability in neoplastic cells that gives rise to additional genetic alterations (i.e., mutations, chromosomal deletions, and/or rearrangements), and (4) metastasis—the spread of cancerous cells to other parts of the body. With increasing knowledge of the number of genes altered in human cancers, it is evident that even a four-stage model is not adequate to describe the carcinogenic process. \n \n \n \nTwo groups of genes control normal tissue growth; protooncogenes promote growth while suppressor genes halt growth. Normal protooncogenes of which there are 300–400 within the human genome regulate cell division and differentiation. If a protooncogene is mutated it may become an activated oncogene that causes the normal regulated cycling pattern of the affected cell to proceed out of control. \n \n \n \nMost tumors are defined by their cell of origin and their behavior or appearance. Benign neoplasms of epithelial origin are referred to as adenomas or papillomas, and benign neoplasms of mesenchymal origin are referred to as fibromas, osteoma, gliomas, etc. Malignant tumors of epithelial cells are carcinomas, and malignant tumors of mesenchymal tissues are sarcomas. \n \n \n \nEnvironmental insults, including ionizing or UV radiation, certain viruses, or various chemical agents can cause genetic damage that converts protooncogenes to oncogenes or inactivates tumor suppressor genes. The simplest definition of a carcinogen is an agent that can cause cancer. However, identifying an agent as a human carcinogen and assessing human risk associated with environmental or occupational exposure is complicated because of the multitude of factors that must be considered: the induction of benign or malignant neoplasms, animal-to-human extrapolations, the influence of mechanistic information on low-dose risk, and the variability in susceptibility among individuals in an exposed population. \n \n \n \nTumor induction by occupational chemicals is a multistep process that may involve activation of the compound to a DNA reactive form, binding of the active metabolite (or parent compound, e.g., ethylene oxide) to DNA forming a DNA adduct, faulty repair of the adduct leading to a gene mutation, replication of the altered cell to fix the mutation in the genome, and further genetic alterations (including gene mutations, gene rearrangements and gene or chromosome deletions) that lead to progression to a metastatic cancer. Alternatively, some chemicals or their metabolites may act by “nongenotoxic” mechanisms whereby normal cell cycling patterns are disregulated as a consequence of altered gene expression, perhaps through receptor mediated processes. In this case, changes in cellular function occur without the chemical producing a direct effect on the normal DNA base sequence. Impacting on these considerations is the recognition that humans are exposed to a multitude of chemicals that have mixed mechanisms of action, and humans vary considerably more than inbred or outbred laboratory animals with respect to genetic factors that influence cancer susceptibility. Thus, the predicted effect of a single agent may be affected by the mechanism of tumor induction, genetic differences among individuals, health status, and other exposure circumstances. \n \n \n \nThe first issue in cancer hazard identification is to determine whether exposure to a particular agent can cause a carcinogenic response. \n \n \n \nThe identification of an agent as a carcinogen is based on information from epidemiological studies, experimental animal studies, in vitro evaluations, and assessments of mechanistic data and structure–activity relationships. Data from these sources have shown that carcinogens may act by very different mechanisms (e.g., direct acting or requiring metabolic activation; genotoxic or nongenotoxic) and that carcinogens are not equal in their potential to cause human cancer. In addition, most carcinogens operate by a combination of mechanisms that may vary in different target tissues. Consequently, there has been much debate on the identification of human carcinogens and in particular on the characterization of human risk associated with exposure to such agents. The term “risk” is used in this chapter to indicate the probability of developing cancer from a particular exposure. Because most known human carcinogens are also carcinogenic in animals when adequately tested, the International Agency for Research on Cancer considers that unless there is convincing data in humans to the contrary, “it is biologically plausible and prudent to regard agents and mixtures for which there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals as if they presented a carcinogenic risk to humans.” \n \n \n \nIndividuals may respond differently to similar exposures to a particular carcinogen. The likelihood of an individual developing cancer in an exposed population depends on extrinsic factors including the intensity, route, frequency, and duration of exposure, as well as on host factors including age, sex, health, nutritional status, and inherited characteristics. Hence, this chapter reviews issues related to the identification of carcinogens and factors that influence human risk. We also provide an update on agents that have been identified as “known” human carcinogens or “probable/reasonably anticipated” human carcinogens by IARC and the National Toxicology Program (NTP), as well as exposure standards developed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to reduce worker exposure to these agents. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \nCancer hazard identification; \nHealth laws; \nCarcinogenic compounds; \nCancer epidemiology; \nCancer susceptibility; \nExperimental cancer methods; \nCase studies; \nIARC classification; \nNTP categories; \nOSHA workplace standards","PeriodicalId":19820,"journal":{"name":"Patty's Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Chemical Carcinogenesis\",\"authors\":\"J. Huff, R. Melnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/0471435139.TOX004.PUB2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cancer is not a single disease, but rather is a general term applied to a multitude of diseases and stages of disease, each of clonal origin, that elicit uncontrollable tissue growth. There are more than 100 different types of cancer. In normal tissue the balance between cell reproduction and cell death determines the ultimate size of an organ. This balance is clearly represented after partial hepatectomy where, following removal of as much as two-thirds of the liver, regeneration results in restoration of the liver to its original size. If a normal cell incurs a defect in its growth regulating processes and acquires a growth advantage over other cells in a particular tissue or organ, it may multiply out of control producing a mass of altered cells; this abnormal overgrowth of new tissue is called a tumor or neoplasm. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe multistep process of carcinogenesis is thought to involve at least four stages: (1) initiation—the induction of a heritable change in a cell resulting from DNA damage (from endogenous processes or by a DNA reactive environmental agent or its metabolites) that can lead to point mutations, insertions, deletions, or chromosomal aberrations; (2) promotion—the clonal expansion of the initiated cell population; (3) progression—the process whereby benign neoplasms become malignant, as a consequence of increased genomic instability in neoplastic cells that gives rise to additional genetic alterations (i.e., mutations, chromosomal deletions, and/or rearrangements), and (4) metastasis—the spread of cancerous cells to other parts of the body. With increasing knowledge of the number of genes altered in human cancers, it is evident that even a four-stage model is not adequate to describe the carcinogenic process. \\n \\n \\n \\nTwo groups of genes control normal tissue growth; protooncogenes promote growth while suppressor genes halt growth. Normal protooncogenes of which there are 300–400 within the human genome regulate cell division and differentiation. If a protooncogene is mutated it may become an activated oncogene that causes the normal regulated cycling pattern of the affected cell to proceed out of control. \\n \\n \\n \\nMost tumors are defined by their cell of origin and their behavior or appearance. Benign neoplasms of epithelial origin are referred to as adenomas or papillomas, and benign neoplasms of mesenchymal origin are referred to as fibromas, osteoma, gliomas, etc. Malignant tumors of epithelial cells are carcinomas, and malignant tumors of mesenchymal tissues are sarcomas. \\n \\n \\n \\nEnvironmental insults, including ionizing or UV radiation, certain viruses, or various chemical agents can cause genetic damage that converts protooncogenes to oncogenes or inactivates tumor suppressor genes. The simplest definition of a carcinogen is an agent that can cause cancer. However, identifying an agent as a human carcinogen and assessing human risk associated with environmental or occupational exposure is complicated because of the multitude of factors that must be considered: the induction of benign or malignant neoplasms, animal-to-human extrapolations, the influence of mechanistic information on low-dose risk, and the variability in susceptibility among individuals in an exposed population. \\n \\n \\n \\nTumor induction by occupational chemicals is a multistep process that may involve activation of the compound to a DNA reactive form, binding of the active metabolite (or parent compound, e.g., ethylene oxide) to DNA forming a DNA adduct, faulty repair of the adduct leading to a gene mutation, replication of the altered cell to fix the mutation in the genome, and further genetic alterations (including gene mutations, gene rearrangements and gene or chromosome deletions) that lead to progression to a metastatic cancer. Alternatively, some chemicals or their metabolites may act by “nongenotoxic” mechanisms whereby normal cell cycling patterns are disregulated as a consequence of altered gene expression, perhaps through receptor mediated processes. In this case, changes in cellular function occur without the chemical producing a direct effect on the normal DNA base sequence. Impacting on these considerations is the recognition that humans are exposed to a multitude of chemicals that have mixed mechanisms of action, and humans vary considerably more than inbred or outbred laboratory animals with respect to genetic factors that influence cancer susceptibility. Thus, the predicted effect of a single agent may be affected by the mechanism of tumor induction, genetic differences among individuals, health status, and other exposure circumstances. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe first issue in cancer hazard identification is to determine whether exposure to a particular agent can cause a carcinogenic response. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe identification of an agent as a carcinogen is based on information from epidemiological studies, experimental animal studies, in vitro evaluations, and assessments of mechanistic data and structure–activity relationships. Data from these sources have shown that carcinogens may act by very different mechanisms (e.g., direct acting or requiring metabolic activation; genotoxic or nongenotoxic) and that carcinogens are not equal in their potential to cause human cancer. In addition, most carcinogens operate by a combination of mechanisms that may vary in different target tissues. Consequently, there has been much debate on the identification of human carcinogens and in particular on the characterization of human risk associated with exposure to such agents. The term “risk” is used in this chapter to indicate the probability of developing cancer from a particular exposure. Because most known human carcinogens are also carcinogenic in animals when adequately tested, the International Agency for Research on Cancer considers that unless there is convincing data in humans to the contrary, “it is biologically plausible and prudent to regard agents and mixtures for which there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals as if they presented a carcinogenic risk to humans.” \\n \\n \\n \\nIndividuals may respond differently to similar exposures to a particular carcinogen. The likelihood of an individual developing cancer in an exposed population depends on extrinsic factors including the intensity, route, frequency, and duration of exposure, as well as on host factors including age, sex, health, nutritional status, and inherited characteristics. Hence, this chapter reviews issues related to the identification of carcinogens and factors that influence human risk. We also provide an update on agents that have been identified as “known” human carcinogens or “probable/reasonably anticipated” human carcinogens by IARC and the National Toxicology Program (NTP), as well as exposure standards developed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to reduce worker exposure to these agents. \\n \\n \\nKeywords: \\n \\nCancer hazard identification; \\nHealth laws; \\nCarcinogenic compounds; \\nCancer epidemiology; \\nCancer susceptibility; \\nExperimental cancer methods; \\nCase studies; \\nIARC classification; \\nNTP categories; \\nOSHA workplace standards\",\"PeriodicalId\":19820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patty's Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patty's Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/0471435139.TOX004.PUB2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patty's Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/0471435139.TOX004.PUB2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自这些来源的数据表明,致癌物可能通过非常不同的机制起作用(例如,直接作用或需要代谢激活;基因毒性或非基因毒性),致癌物质导致人类癌症的可能性是不相等的。此外,大多数致癌物是通过多种机制共同作用的,这些机制在不同的靶组织中可能有所不同。因此,对人类致癌物的鉴定,特别是对与接触这类物质有关的人类风险的特征,一直存在许多争论。本章使用“风险”一词来表示由于某种特定的接触而患癌症的可能性。由于大多数已知的人类致癌物在经过充分测试后对动物也具有致癌性,国际癌症研究机构认为,除非在人类身上有令人信服的相反数据,否则“从生物学上讲,把在实验动物身上有充分致癌性证据的物质和混合物视为对人类具有致癌风险是合理和谨慎的。”个体对某种致癌物的相似暴露可能有不同的反应。暴露人群中个体发生癌症的可能性取决于外部因素,包括暴露的强度、途径、频率和持续时间,以及宿主因素,包括年龄、性别、健康、营养状况和遗传特征。因此,本章回顾了与确定致癌物质和影响人类风险的因素有关的问题。我们还提供了IARC和国家毒理学计划(NTP)确定为“已知”人类致癌物或“可能/合理预期”人类致癌物的最新情况,以及职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)制定的暴露标准,以减少工人接触这些致癌物。关键词:癌症危害识别;卫生法律;致癌物质;癌症流行病学;癌症易感性;实验性癌症方法;案例研究;IARC的分类;国家结核控制规划分类;OSHA工作场所标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational Chemical Carcinogenesis
Cancer is not a single disease, but rather is a general term applied to a multitude of diseases and stages of disease, each of clonal origin, that elicit uncontrollable tissue growth. There are more than 100 different types of cancer. In normal tissue the balance between cell reproduction and cell death determines the ultimate size of an organ. This balance is clearly represented after partial hepatectomy where, following removal of as much as two-thirds of the liver, regeneration results in restoration of the liver to its original size. If a normal cell incurs a defect in its growth regulating processes and acquires a growth advantage over other cells in a particular tissue or organ, it may multiply out of control producing a mass of altered cells; this abnormal overgrowth of new tissue is called a tumor or neoplasm. The multistep process of carcinogenesis is thought to involve at least four stages: (1) initiation—the induction of a heritable change in a cell resulting from DNA damage (from endogenous processes or by a DNA reactive environmental agent or its metabolites) that can lead to point mutations, insertions, deletions, or chromosomal aberrations; (2) promotion—the clonal expansion of the initiated cell population; (3) progression—the process whereby benign neoplasms become malignant, as a consequence of increased genomic instability in neoplastic cells that gives rise to additional genetic alterations (i.e., mutations, chromosomal deletions, and/or rearrangements), and (4) metastasis—the spread of cancerous cells to other parts of the body. With increasing knowledge of the number of genes altered in human cancers, it is evident that even a four-stage model is not adequate to describe the carcinogenic process. Two groups of genes control normal tissue growth; protooncogenes promote growth while suppressor genes halt growth. Normal protooncogenes of which there are 300–400 within the human genome regulate cell division and differentiation. If a protooncogene is mutated it may become an activated oncogene that causes the normal regulated cycling pattern of the affected cell to proceed out of control. Most tumors are defined by their cell of origin and their behavior or appearance. Benign neoplasms of epithelial origin are referred to as adenomas or papillomas, and benign neoplasms of mesenchymal origin are referred to as fibromas, osteoma, gliomas, etc. Malignant tumors of epithelial cells are carcinomas, and malignant tumors of mesenchymal tissues are sarcomas. Environmental insults, including ionizing or UV radiation, certain viruses, or various chemical agents can cause genetic damage that converts protooncogenes to oncogenes or inactivates tumor suppressor genes. The simplest definition of a carcinogen is an agent that can cause cancer. However, identifying an agent as a human carcinogen and assessing human risk associated with environmental or occupational exposure is complicated because of the multitude of factors that must be considered: the induction of benign or malignant neoplasms, animal-to-human extrapolations, the influence of mechanistic information on low-dose risk, and the variability in susceptibility among individuals in an exposed population. Tumor induction by occupational chemicals is a multistep process that may involve activation of the compound to a DNA reactive form, binding of the active metabolite (or parent compound, e.g., ethylene oxide) to DNA forming a DNA adduct, faulty repair of the adduct leading to a gene mutation, replication of the altered cell to fix the mutation in the genome, and further genetic alterations (including gene mutations, gene rearrangements and gene or chromosome deletions) that lead to progression to a metastatic cancer. Alternatively, some chemicals or their metabolites may act by “nongenotoxic” mechanisms whereby normal cell cycling patterns are disregulated as a consequence of altered gene expression, perhaps through receptor mediated processes. In this case, changes in cellular function occur without the chemical producing a direct effect on the normal DNA base sequence. Impacting on these considerations is the recognition that humans are exposed to a multitude of chemicals that have mixed mechanisms of action, and humans vary considerably more than inbred or outbred laboratory animals with respect to genetic factors that influence cancer susceptibility. Thus, the predicted effect of a single agent may be affected by the mechanism of tumor induction, genetic differences among individuals, health status, and other exposure circumstances. The first issue in cancer hazard identification is to determine whether exposure to a particular agent can cause a carcinogenic response. The identification of an agent as a carcinogen is based on information from epidemiological studies, experimental animal studies, in vitro evaluations, and assessments of mechanistic data and structure–activity relationships. Data from these sources have shown that carcinogens may act by very different mechanisms (e.g., direct acting or requiring metabolic activation; genotoxic or nongenotoxic) and that carcinogens are not equal in their potential to cause human cancer. In addition, most carcinogens operate by a combination of mechanisms that may vary in different target tissues. Consequently, there has been much debate on the identification of human carcinogens and in particular on the characterization of human risk associated with exposure to such agents. The term “risk” is used in this chapter to indicate the probability of developing cancer from a particular exposure. Because most known human carcinogens are also carcinogenic in animals when adequately tested, the International Agency for Research on Cancer considers that unless there is convincing data in humans to the contrary, “it is biologically plausible and prudent to regard agents and mixtures for which there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals as if they presented a carcinogenic risk to humans.” Individuals may respond differently to similar exposures to a particular carcinogen. The likelihood of an individual developing cancer in an exposed population depends on extrinsic factors including the intensity, route, frequency, and duration of exposure, as well as on host factors including age, sex, health, nutritional status, and inherited characteristics. Hence, this chapter reviews issues related to the identification of carcinogens and factors that influence human risk. We also provide an update on agents that have been identified as “known” human carcinogens or “probable/reasonably anticipated” human carcinogens by IARC and the National Toxicology Program (NTP), as well as exposure standards developed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to reduce worker exposure to these agents. Keywords: Cancer hazard identification; Health laws; Carcinogenic compounds; Cancer epidemiology; Cancer susceptibility; Experimental cancer methods; Case studies; IARC classification; NTP categories; OSHA workplace standards
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信