遗传算法与模因算法在有草案限制的旅行商问题中的比较

Bruno Duarte, L. C. Oliveira, Marcelo Teixeira, Marco A. C. Barbosa
{"title":"遗传算法与模因算法在有草案限制的旅行商问题中的比较","authors":"Bruno Duarte, L. C. Oliveira, Marcelo Teixeira, Marco A. C. Barbosa","doi":"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Traveling Salesman Problem with Draft Limits is a combinatorial optimization problem that consists in calculating routes to be taken by cargo ships without violating draft limits restrictions, so reducing transportation costs. Finding the best route solution, using exact computation, is a problem whose complexity grows exponentially with the number of routes and, therefore, is unfeasible for practical cases. Approximations to the best solution, computed using heuristis and metaheuristics, appear as promising and feasible alternatives to address this problem with reasonable accuracy. This paper exploits two metaheuristics, Genetic and Memetic Algorithms, under the perspective of Evolutionary Algorithms, to address the problem at hand. After they are implemented and applied over a route planning map, their effectiveness are compared against each other and also against the literature. Results suggest that the method based on Memetic Algorithm is slightly better (5.28% average error) in comparison with the Genetic-based approach (12.96%), which is shown to be competitive with respect to the literature.","PeriodicalId":6803,"journal":{"name":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"62 26","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of Genetic and Memetic Algorithms applied to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Draft Limits\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Duarte, L. C. Oliveira, Marcelo Teixeira, Marco A. C. Barbosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Traveling Salesman Problem with Draft Limits is a combinatorial optimization problem that consists in calculating routes to be taken by cargo ships without violating draft limits restrictions, so reducing transportation costs. Finding the best route solution, using exact computation, is a problem whose complexity grows exponentially with the number of routes and, therefore, is unfeasible for practical cases. Approximations to the best solution, computed using heuristis and metaheuristics, appear as promising and feasible alternatives to address this problem with reasonable accuracy. This paper exploits two metaheuristics, Genetic and Memetic Algorithms, under the perspective of Evolutionary Algorithms, to address the problem at hand. After they are implemented and applied over a route planning map, their effectiveness are compared against each other and also against the literature. Results suggest that the method based on Memetic Algorithm is slightly better (5.28% average error) in comparison with the Genetic-based approach (12.96%), which is shown to be competitive with respect to the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"volume\":\"62 26\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有吃水限制的旅行商问题是在不违反吃水限制的情况下计算货船的路线以降低运输成本的组合优化问题。使用精确计算方法寻找最佳路径解是一个复杂度随路径数量呈指数增长的问题,因此在实际情况下是不可行的。使用启发式和元启发式计算的最佳解决方案的近似值似乎是有希望的和可行的替代方案,可以以合理的准确性解决这个问题。本文在进化算法的视角下,利用遗传和模因两种元启发式算法来解决当前的问题。在实现并应用于路线规划图之后,将它们的有效性相互比较,并与文献进行比较。结果表明,基于Memetic算法的方法(平均误差5.28%)略优于基于genetic的方法(平均误差12.96%),具有一定的文献竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of Genetic and Memetic Algorithms applied to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Draft Limits
The Traveling Salesman Problem with Draft Limits is a combinatorial optimization problem that consists in calculating routes to be taken by cargo ships without violating draft limits restrictions, so reducing transportation costs. Finding the best route solution, using exact computation, is a problem whose complexity grows exponentially with the number of routes and, therefore, is unfeasible for practical cases. Approximations to the best solution, computed using heuristis and metaheuristics, appear as promising and feasible alternatives to address this problem with reasonable accuracy. This paper exploits two metaheuristics, Genetic and Memetic Algorithms, under the perspective of Evolutionary Algorithms, to address the problem at hand. After they are implemented and applied over a route planning map, their effectiveness are compared against each other and also against the literature. Results suggest that the method based on Memetic Algorithm is slightly better (5.28% average error) in comparison with the Genetic-based approach (12.96%), which is shown to be competitive with respect to the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信