{"title":"寻找意义:重新构想管理研究的案例","authors":"G. Hamel, J. Birkinshaw","doi":"10.1561/111.00000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"• Novelty—The knowledge should be non-incremental, frame-breaking, and more than a turgid and unnecessarily complex restatement of what a smart practitioner would already know or assume. • Salience—The knowledge should speak to some timely and essential problem facing a significant number of practitioners. • Usability—The knowledge should be practically useful, with implications for practice are clearly enumerated.","PeriodicalId":100721,"journal":{"name":"International Strategic Management Review","volume":"85 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Searching for Significance: The Case for Reimagining Management Research\",\"authors\":\"G. Hamel, J. Birkinshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/111.00000054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"• Novelty—The knowledge should be non-incremental, frame-breaking, and more than a turgid and unnecessarily complex restatement of what a smart practitioner would already know or assume. • Salience—The knowledge should speak to some timely and essential problem facing a significant number of practitioners. • Usability—The knowledge should be practically useful, with implications for practice are clearly enumerated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Strategic Management Review\",\"volume\":\"85 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Strategic Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Strategic Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Searching for Significance: The Case for Reimagining Management Research
• Novelty—The knowledge should be non-incremental, frame-breaking, and more than a turgid and unnecessarily complex restatement of what a smart practitioner would already know or assume. • Salience—The knowledge should speak to some timely and essential problem facing a significant number of practitioners. • Usability—The knowledge should be practically useful, with implications for practice are clearly enumerated.