学生适应不同教学方法的可接受性

Amar Shukla, S. Singhal, T. Choudhury, S. Mohanty
{"title":"学生适应不同教学方法的可接受性","authors":"Amar Shukla, S. Singhal, T. Choudhury, S. Mohanty","doi":"10.4018/ijec.318335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The learning methodologies used by students are directly proportional to their abilities to learn. Various learning methodologies have been used to gain student acceptance and satisfaction with the module taught by the teacher. In this article, the authors approach the different methods and analyze these methodologies. To determine the impact, they considered both the face-to-face learning process and the online mode of learning to determine the exact effect on the student. So, to address this, a two-way survey was conducted. The first revealed the student satisfaction rate with the course approached through the online mode of learning. Second, a comparative study was made using ANOVA methods between the online way and the face-to-face methodology. A significant observation was made in the test, and it shows that the hybrid model of teaching provides better performance than the face-to-face method.","PeriodicalId":13957,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. e Collab.","volume":"230 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learners' Acceptability of Adapting the Different Teaching Methodologies for Students\",\"authors\":\"Amar Shukla, S. Singhal, T. Choudhury, S. Mohanty\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijec.318335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The learning methodologies used by students are directly proportional to their abilities to learn. Various learning methodologies have been used to gain student acceptance and satisfaction with the module taught by the teacher. In this article, the authors approach the different methods and analyze these methodologies. To determine the impact, they considered both the face-to-face learning process and the online mode of learning to determine the exact effect on the student. So, to address this, a two-way survey was conducted. The first revealed the student satisfaction rate with the course approached through the online mode of learning. Second, a comparative study was made using ANOVA methods between the online way and the face-to-face methodology. A significant observation was made in the test, and it shows that the hybrid model of teaching provides better performance than the face-to-face method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. e Collab.\",\"volume\":\"230 1\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. e Collab.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.318335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. e Collab.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.318335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学生使用的学习方法与他们的学习能力成正比。各种学习方法已被使用,以获得学生的接受和满意的模块,由老师教。在本文中,作者探讨了不同的方法,并对这些方法进行了分析。为了确定影响,他们考虑了面对面学习过程和在线学习模式,以确定对学生的确切影响。因此,为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项双向调查。第一项调查揭示了学生对通过在线学习模式学习的课程的满意度。其次,使用方差分析方法对在线方式和面对面方法进行了比较研究。在测试中有一个重要的观察,它表明混合教学模式比面对面的方法提供更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learners' Acceptability of Adapting the Different Teaching Methodologies for Students
The learning methodologies used by students are directly proportional to their abilities to learn. Various learning methodologies have been used to gain student acceptance and satisfaction with the module taught by the teacher. In this article, the authors approach the different methods and analyze these methodologies. To determine the impact, they considered both the face-to-face learning process and the online mode of learning to determine the exact effect on the student. So, to address this, a two-way survey was conducted. The first revealed the student satisfaction rate with the course approached through the online mode of learning. Second, a comparative study was made using ANOVA methods between the online way and the face-to-face methodology. A significant observation was made in the test, and it shows that the hybrid model of teaching provides better performance than the face-to-face method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信