Yu Feng, Hui Liu, Yingying Ding, Ya Zhang, C. Liao, Yan Jin, Conghui Ai
{"title":"动态DCE-MRI与弥散加权成像联合评价宫颈癌新辅助化疗的效果","authors":"Yu Feng, Hui Liu, Yingying Ding, Ya Zhang, C. Liao, Yan Jin, Conghui Ai","doi":"10.1177/0300891619886656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To prospectively investigate changes in quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with cervical cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: Thirty-eight patients with cervical cancer underwent DCE-MRI and DWI 1 week before and 4 weeks after NACT. The patients were classified into 2 groups: significant reaction (sCR) group and the non-sCR group. DCE-MRI parameters and ADC values were measured and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Before NACT, the mean Ktrans value was higher, but the mean Ve was lower, in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). After NACT, the mean Ktrans value and the delta (i.e., changed) value of Ktrans were significantly lower in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group (p<0.05). However, the mean ADC and the delta value of the mean ADC between the 2 groups were slightly higher in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group (p<0.05). The area under the curve of pre-mean Ktrans, DKtrans, and pre-mean Ktrans combined with post-mean ADC values were 0.801, 0.955, and 0.878, respectively (p<0.05). The optimal cutoff values for distinguishing sCR from non-sCR were pretreatment Ktrans (0.7020 min−1) and DKtrans (0.0437 min−1). Conclusions: Quantitative parameters (pre-mean Ktrans, DKtrans, and pre-mean Ktrans) combined with post-mean ADC could predict treatment efficacy more precisely. However, quantitative DCE-MRI combined with DWI could not significantly improve prognostic efficacy.","PeriodicalId":23450,"journal":{"name":"Tumori Journal","volume":"1 7","pages":"155 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined dynamic DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer\",\"authors\":\"Yu Feng, Hui Liu, Yingying Ding, Ya Zhang, C. Liao, Yan Jin, Conghui Ai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0300891619886656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To prospectively investigate changes in quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with cervical cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: Thirty-eight patients with cervical cancer underwent DCE-MRI and DWI 1 week before and 4 weeks after NACT. The patients were classified into 2 groups: significant reaction (sCR) group and the non-sCR group. DCE-MRI parameters and ADC values were measured and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Before NACT, the mean Ktrans value was higher, but the mean Ve was lower, in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). After NACT, the mean Ktrans value and the delta (i.e., changed) value of Ktrans were significantly lower in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group (p<0.05). However, the mean ADC and the delta value of the mean ADC between the 2 groups were slightly higher in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group (p<0.05). The area under the curve of pre-mean Ktrans, DKtrans, and pre-mean Ktrans combined with post-mean ADC values were 0.801, 0.955, and 0.878, respectively (p<0.05). The optimal cutoff values for distinguishing sCR from non-sCR were pretreatment Ktrans (0.7020 min−1) and DKtrans (0.0437 min−1). Conclusions: Quantitative parameters (pre-mean Ktrans, DKtrans, and pre-mean Ktrans) combined with post-mean ADC could predict treatment efficacy more precisely. However, quantitative DCE-MRI combined with DWI could not significantly improve prognostic efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tumori Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 7\",\"pages\":\"155 - 164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tumori Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891619886656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891619886656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined dynamic DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer
Purpose: To prospectively investigate changes in quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with cervical cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: Thirty-eight patients with cervical cancer underwent DCE-MRI and DWI 1 week before and 4 weeks after NACT. The patients were classified into 2 groups: significant reaction (sCR) group and the non-sCR group. DCE-MRI parameters and ADC values were measured and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Before NACT, the mean Ktrans value was higher, but the mean Ve was lower, in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). After NACT, the mean Ktrans value and the delta (i.e., changed) value of Ktrans were significantly lower in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group (p<0.05). However, the mean ADC and the delta value of the mean ADC between the 2 groups were slightly higher in the sCR group compared with the non-sCR group (p<0.05). The area under the curve of pre-mean Ktrans, DKtrans, and pre-mean Ktrans combined with post-mean ADC values were 0.801, 0.955, and 0.878, respectively (p<0.05). The optimal cutoff values for distinguishing sCR from non-sCR were pretreatment Ktrans (0.7020 min−1) and DKtrans (0.0437 min−1). Conclusions: Quantitative parameters (pre-mean Ktrans, DKtrans, and pre-mean Ktrans) combined with post-mean ADC could predict treatment efficacy more precisely. However, quantitative DCE-MRI combined with DWI could not significantly improve prognostic efficacy.