血培养阳性脓毒症患者体外膜氧合的疗效

C. Blazoski, Qiong Yang, H. Hirose
{"title":"血培养阳性脓毒症患者体外膜氧合的疗效","authors":"C. Blazoski, Qiong Yang, H. Hirose","doi":"10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commonly used for \nrefractory cardiac or respiratory failure. There are reported cases of \nsuccessful use of ECMO in patients with septic shock; however, there is a lack \nof evidence to prove its overall efficacy. Thus, we conducted this study to \nanalyze the relationship between sepsis and ECMO in our own patients. METHODS: 305 patients who were placed on ECMO between 2010 and 2020 were identified \nwithin an IRB-approved database. Their clinical outcomes were analyzed with a specific focus on patients who were \nseptic before or during ECMO, defined as a positive blood culture. Group S was \ncomposed of patients with a positive blood culture before or during ECMO, while \nGroup N was composed of all patients without a positive blood culture before or \nduring ECMO. The primary outcome compared between groups was ECMO survival rate. RESULTS: Among the \n305 patients on ECMO, 58 (19%) were in Group S and 247 (81%) were in Group N. \nECMO survival rates were 45% in Group S and 62% in Group N (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Of our 305 patients, patients who were septic upon \nECMO placement or those who \ndeveloped sepsis during ECMO had worse ECMO survival rates than non-septic \npatients. Ultimately, patients who are septic or have a high probability of \nbecoming septic may not be indicated for ECMO placement, and cautious \nadministration of ECMO to these patients may be necessary.","PeriodicalId":23646,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"243 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Blood Culture Positive Septic Patients\",\"authors\":\"C. Blazoski, Qiong Yang, H. Hirose\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commonly used for \\nrefractory cardiac or respiratory failure. There are reported cases of \\nsuccessful use of ECMO in patients with septic shock; however, there is a lack \\nof evidence to prove its overall efficacy. Thus, we conducted this study to \\nanalyze the relationship between sepsis and ECMO in our own patients. METHODS: 305 patients who were placed on ECMO between 2010 and 2020 were identified \\nwithin an IRB-approved database. Their clinical outcomes were analyzed with a specific focus on patients who were \\nseptic before or during ECMO, defined as a positive blood culture. Group S was \\ncomposed of patients with a positive blood culture before or during ECMO, while \\nGroup N was composed of all patients without a positive blood culture before or \\nduring ECMO. The primary outcome compared between groups was ECMO survival rate. RESULTS: Among the \\n305 patients on ECMO, 58 (19%) were in Group S and 247 (81%) were in Group N. \\nECMO survival rates were 45% in Group S and 62% in Group N (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Of our 305 patients, patients who were septic upon \\nECMO placement or those who \\ndeveloped sepsis during ECMO had worse ECMO survival rates than non-septic \\npatients. Ultimately, patients who are septic or have a high probability of \\nbecoming septic may not be indicated for ECMO placement, and cautious \\nadministration of ECMO to these patients may be necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"243 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

体外膜氧合(ECMO)常用于治疗难治性心脏或呼吸衰竭。有报道称,在脓毒性休克患者中成功使用ECMO;然而,缺乏证据证明其整体功效。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以分析我们自己的患者脓毒症与ECMO的关系。方法:在2010年至2020年期间,在irb批准的数据库中确定了305名接受ECMO的患者。他们的临床结果被分析,特别关注在ECMO之前或期间败血症的患者,定义为阳性血培养。S组由ECMO前或ECMO期间血培养阳性的患者组成,N组由ECMO前或ECMO期间血培养未阳性的患者组成。各组间比较的主要转归为ECMO生存率。结果:305例ECMO患者中,S组58例(19%),N组247例(81%),S组ECMO生存率为45%,N组为62% (p = 0.017)。结论:在我们的305例患者中,在ECMO放置时脓毒症患者或在ECMO期间发生脓毒症的患者的ECMO生存率低于非脓毒症患者。最终,脓毒性或脓毒性高的患者可能不适合放置ECMO,对这些患者谨慎使用ECMO可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Blood Culture Positive Septic Patients
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commonly used for refractory cardiac or respiratory failure. There are reported cases of successful use of ECMO in patients with septic shock; however, there is a lack of evidence to prove its overall efficacy. Thus, we conducted this study to analyze the relationship between sepsis and ECMO in our own patients. METHODS: 305 patients who were placed on ECMO between 2010 and 2020 were identified within an IRB-approved database. Their clinical outcomes were analyzed with a specific focus on patients who were septic before or during ECMO, defined as a positive blood culture. Group S was composed of patients with a positive blood culture before or during ECMO, while Group N was composed of all patients without a positive blood culture before or during ECMO. The primary outcome compared between groups was ECMO survival rate. RESULTS: Among the 305 patients on ECMO, 58 (19%) were in Group S and 247 (81%) were in Group N. ECMO survival rates were 45% in Group S and 62% in Group N (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Of our 305 patients, patients who were septic upon ECMO placement or those who developed sepsis during ECMO had worse ECMO survival rates than non-septic patients. Ultimately, patients who are septic or have a high probability of becoming septic may not be indicated for ECMO placement, and cautious administration of ECMO to these patients may be necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信