{"title":"血培养阳性脓毒症患者体外膜氧合的疗效","authors":"C. Blazoski, Qiong Yang, H. Hirose","doi":"10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commonly used for \nrefractory cardiac or respiratory failure. There are reported cases of \nsuccessful use of ECMO in patients with septic shock; however, there is a lack \nof evidence to prove its overall efficacy. Thus, we conducted this study to \nanalyze the relationship between sepsis and ECMO in our own patients. METHODS: 305 patients who were placed on ECMO between 2010 and 2020 were identified \nwithin an IRB-approved database. Their clinical outcomes were analyzed with a specific focus on patients who were \nseptic before or during ECMO, defined as a positive blood culture. Group S was \ncomposed of patients with a positive blood culture before or during ECMO, while \nGroup N was composed of all patients without a positive blood culture before or \nduring ECMO. The primary outcome compared between groups was ECMO survival rate. RESULTS: Among the \n305 patients on ECMO, 58 (19%) were in Group S and 247 (81%) were in Group N. \nECMO survival rates were 45% in Group S and 62% in Group N (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Of our 305 patients, patients who were septic upon \nECMO placement or those who \ndeveloped sepsis during ECMO had worse ECMO survival rates than non-septic \npatients. Ultimately, patients who are septic or have a high probability of \nbecoming septic may not be indicated for ECMO placement, and cautious \nadministration of ECMO to these patients may be necessary.","PeriodicalId":23646,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"243 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Blood Culture Positive Septic Patients\",\"authors\":\"C. Blazoski, Qiong Yang, H. Hirose\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commonly used for \\nrefractory cardiac or respiratory failure. There are reported cases of \\nsuccessful use of ECMO in patients with septic shock; however, there is a lack \\nof evidence to prove its overall efficacy. Thus, we conducted this study to \\nanalyze the relationship between sepsis and ECMO in our own patients. METHODS: 305 patients who were placed on ECMO between 2010 and 2020 were identified \\nwithin an IRB-approved database. Their clinical outcomes were analyzed with a specific focus on patients who were \\nseptic before or during ECMO, defined as a positive blood culture. Group S was \\ncomposed of patients with a positive blood culture before or during ECMO, while \\nGroup N was composed of all patients without a positive blood culture before or \\nduring ECMO. The primary outcome compared between groups was ECMO survival rate. RESULTS: Among the \\n305 patients on ECMO, 58 (19%) were in Group S and 247 (81%) were in Group N. \\nECMO survival rates were 45% in Group S and 62% in Group N (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Of our 305 patients, patients who were septic upon \\nECMO placement or those who \\ndeveloped sepsis during ECMO had worse ECMO survival rates than non-septic \\npatients. Ultimately, patients who are septic or have a high probability of \\nbecoming septic may not be indicated for ECMO placement, and cautious \\nadministration of ECMO to these patients may be necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"243 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.108019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Blood Culture Positive Septic Patients
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commonly used for
refractory cardiac or respiratory failure. There are reported cases of
successful use of ECMO in patients with septic shock; however, there is a lack
of evidence to prove its overall efficacy. Thus, we conducted this study to
analyze the relationship between sepsis and ECMO in our own patients. METHODS: 305 patients who were placed on ECMO between 2010 and 2020 were identified
within an IRB-approved database. Their clinical outcomes were analyzed with a specific focus on patients who were
septic before or during ECMO, defined as a positive blood culture. Group S was
composed of patients with a positive blood culture before or during ECMO, while
Group N was composed of all patients without a positive blood culture before or
during ECMO. The primary outcome compared between groups was ECMO survival rate. RESULTS: Among the
305 patients on ECMO, 58 (19%) were in Group S and 247 (81%) were in Group N.
ECMO survival rates were 45% in Group S and 62% in Group N (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Of our 305 patients, patients who were septic upon
ECMO placement or those who
developed sepsis during ECMO had worse ECMO survival rates than non-septic
patients. Ultimately, patients who are septic or have a high probability of
becoming septic may not be indicated for ECMO placement, and cautious
administration of ECMO to these patients may be necessary.