亚历山德里亚大学附属医院患者气消化道异物取出的发生率、模式及不同方式

Habashy Abd Elbaset Elhamady , Abd Elmaguid Mohammad Ramadan , Alaa Hazem Gaafar , Ayman Ibrahim Baess , Sally W. Hammad
{"title":"亚历山德里亚大学附属医院患者气消化道异物取出的发生率、模式及不同方式","authors":"Habashy Abd Elbaset Elhamady ,&nbsp;Abd Elmaguid Mohammad Ramadan ,&nbsp;Alaa Hazem Gaafar ,&nbsp;Ayman Ibrahim Baess ,&nbsp;Sally W. Hammad","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2017.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aero-digestive tract foreign bodies (FB) are commonly seen either in children or in elderly age group. Various methods have been described in literature for their removal. In our study we aimed to analyze the incidence, risk factors, site, clinical presentations, different modalities used to extract tracheobronchial and esophageal foreign bodies in patients presented with FB aspiration or ingestion to the Emergency, Cardiothoracic Surgery, ENT and Chest disease departments in Alexandria Main University Hospital during the period between 1-11-2014 to 1-11-2015.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A review of ninety patients with alleged FB aspiration and one hundred patients with alleged FB ingestion underwent complete history taking including personal data, date of presentation, date of aspiration or ingestion, circumstances of aspiration or ingestion, and past history of any previous medical or surgical conditions. Clinical assessment included vital signs and complete physical examination &amp; investigations e.g.; complete blood count, random blood sugar, coagulation profile, renal function tests and liver function tests. Imaging including plain X-ray, CT scan, ultrasound, and virtual bronchoscopy were done. Some patients underwent rigid esophagoscopy/bronchoscopy under general anesthesia, based on clinical and radiological evidence. Some patients underwent surgical interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regarding FB aspiration, we found that sex difference was statistically significant in teenagers and adult group; females were found to be more commonly affected than males. Also most of cases of pin aspiration were teenagers (&gt;10–20 years) and adults (&gt;20 years). We noticed that right main bronchus FB was found more frequently in children below 10 years. Rigid bronchoscopic extraction of the FBs was the most common modality of extraction seen in 70 patients (77.8%). Regarding FB ingestion we noticed that females were commonly affected than males, coins were the most commonly ingested FB; and upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) was the commonest site of FB entrapment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>FBs in the aero-digestive tract constituted a constant hazard in all age groups especially in children and the elderly, which demanded immediate action and management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 154-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2017.05.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence, patterns and different modalities in extraction of aero-digestive tract foreign bodies in patients attending Alexandria Main University Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Habashy Abd Elbaset Elhamady ,&nbsp;Abd Elmaguid Mohammad Ramadan ,&nbsp;Alaa Hazem Gaafar ,&nbsp;Ayman Ibrahim Baess ,&nbsp;Sally W. Hammad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jescts.2017.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aero-digestive tract foreign bodies (FB) are commonly seen either in children or in elderly age group. Various methods have been described in literature for their removal. In our study we aimed to analyze the incidence, risk factors, site, clinical presentations, different modalities used to extract tracheobronchial and esophageal foreign bodies in patients presented with FB aspiration or ingestion to the Emergency, Cardiothoracic Surgery, ENT and Chest disease departments in Alexandria Main University Hospital during the period between 1-11-2014 to 1-11-2015.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A review of ninety patients with alleged FB aspiration and one hundred patients with alleged FB ingestion underwent complete history taking including personal data, date of presentation, date of aspiration or ingestion, circumstances of aspiration or ingestion, and past history of any previous medical or surgical conditions. Clinical assessment included vital signs and complete physical examination &amp; investigations e.g.; complete blood count, random blood sugar, coagulation profile, renal function tests and liver function tests. Imaging including plain X-ray, CT scan, ultrasound, and virtual bronchoscopy were done. Some patients underwent rigid esophagoscopy/bronchoscopy under general anesthesia, based on clinical and radiological evidence. Some patients underwent surgical interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regarding FB aspiration, we found that sex difference was statistically significant in teenagers and adult group; females were found to be more commonly affected than males. Also most of cases of pin aspiration were teenagers (&gt;10–20 years) and adults (&gt;20 years). We noticed that right main bronchus FB was found more frequently in children below 10 years. Rigid bronchoscopic extraction of the FBs was the most common modality of extraction seen in 70 patients (77.8%). Regarding FB ingestion we noticed that females were commonly affected than males, coins were the most commonly ingested FB; and upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) was the commonest site of FB entrapment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>FBs in the aero-digestive tract constituted a constant hazard in all age groups especially in children and the elderly, which demanded immediate action and management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 154-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2017.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X17300421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X17300421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:消化道异物(FB)在儿童和老年人中都很常见。文献中描述了各种去除它们的方法。在我们的研究中,我们旨在分析2014年1月11日至2015年1月11日期间在亚历山大大学医院急诊科、心胸外科、耳鼻喉科和胸科就诊的FB吸入或摄入患者的发生率、危险因素、部位、临床表现以及不同的气管支气管和食管异物取出方式。方法回顾性分析90例FB误吸患者和100例FB误食患者的完整病史,包括个人资料、就诊日期、误吸或误食日期、误吸或误食情况以及既往任何内科或外科病史。临床评估包括生命体征和全面体格检查;调查如;全血细胞计数随机血糖凝血检查肾功能和肝功能检查影像学检查包括x线平片、CT扫描、超声及虚拟支气管镜检查。根据临床和放射学证据,一些患者在全身麻醉下行刚性食管镜/支气管镜检查。一些患者接受了手术干预。结果在FB吸入量方面,青少年组和成年组的性别差异有统计学意义;研究发现,女性比男性更容易受到影响。针误吸以青少年(10 ~ 20岁)和成人(20岁)居多。我们注意到右主支气管FB在10岁以下儿童中更为常见。70例患者(77.8%)中,刚性支气管镜下提取FBs是最常见的提取方式。关于FB摄入,我们注意到女性比男性更容易受到影响,硬币是最常摄入的FB;食管上括约肌(UES)是最常见的FB夹闭部位。结论sfbs在各年龄组尤其是儿童和老年人中都是一种持续存在的危害,需要立即采取行动和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence, patterns and different modalities in extraction of aero-digestive tract foreign bodies in patients attending Alexandria Main University Hospital

Background

Aero-digestive tract foreign bodies (FB) are commonly seen either in children or in elderly age group. Various methods have been described in literature for their removal. In our study we aimed to analyze the incidence, risk factors, site, clinical presentations, different modalities used to extract tracheobronchial and esophageal foreign bodies in patients presented with FB aspiration or ingestion to the Emergency, Cardiothoracic Surgery, ENT and Chest disease departments in Alexandria Main University Hospital during the period between 1-11-2014 to 1-11-2015.

Methods

A review of ninety patients with alleged FB aspiration and one hundred patients with alleged FB ingestion underwent complete history taking including personal data, date of presentation, date of aspiration or ingestion, circumstances of aspiration or ingestion, and past history of any previous medical or surgical conditions. Clinical assessment included vital signs and complete physical examination & investigations e.g.; complete blood count, random blood sugar, coagulation profile, renal function tests and liver function tests. Imaging including plain X-ray, CT scan, ultrasound, and virtual bronchoscopy were done. Some patients underwent rigid esophagoscopy/bronchoscopy under general anesthesia, based on clinical and radiological evidence. Some patients underwent surgical interventions.

Results

Regarding FB aspiration, we found that sex difference was statistically significant in teenagers and adult group; females were found to be more commonly affected than males. Also most of cases of pin aspiration were teenagers (>10–20 years) and adults (>20 years). We noticed that right main bronchus FB was found more frequently in children below 10 years. Rigid bronchoscopic extraction of the FBs was the most common modality of extraction seen in 70 patients (77.8%). Regarding FB ingestion we noticed that females were commonly affected than males, coins were the most commonly ingested FB; and upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) was the commonest site of FB entrapment.

Conclusions

FBs in the aero-digestive tract constituted a constant hazard in all age groups especially in children and the elderly, which demanded immediate action and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信