马凡氏综合征患者基于药物的心血管预防:一项系统综述。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Minerva cardiology and angiology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-20 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06184-7
Rita Pavasini, Federico Sanguettoli, Maria A Deserio, Nicola Bianchi, Luca Zanarelli, Gioele Fabbri, Elisabetta Tonet, Giulia Passarini, Matteo Serenelli, Gianluca Campo
{"title":"马凡氏综合征患者基于药物的心血管预防:一项系统综述。","authors":"Rita Pavasini, Federico Sanguettoli, Maria A Deserio, Nicola Bianchi, Luca Zanarelli, Gioele Fabbri, Elisabetta Tonet, Giulia Passarini, Matteo Serenelli, Gianluca Campo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06184-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a rare and complex genetic disorder associated with increased aortic growth and aortic disease. The effectiveness of cardiovascular medical therapies aiming to slow down aortic growth has been tested in several trials, particularly beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers, however showing conflicting results.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We conducted a systematic review on PubMed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Biomed Central databases between January and February 2022. We selected relevant articles focusing on patients with MFS treated with beta-blockers, angiotensin receptors blockers, or both, and reporting data on the effect of the drugs on 1) slowing down aortic dilatation; 2) the reduction of aortic complication (aortic dissection, mortality, aortic surgery); and with a 3) follow-up length of at least two years. A total of 16 studies were selected.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Beta-blockers remain the mainstay of therapy as they have proven to slow aortic enlargement. Angiotensin receptor blockers are a useful alternative and with proven benefit as an add-on therapy to limit aortic growth. Neither beta-blockers, nor angiotensin receptor blockers have shown meaningful results on clinical aortic endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence of pharmacological treatment for MFS patients is conflicting due to the lack of large, randomized clinical trials with adequate follow-up studies and homogeneous age grouping. Beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are the only available treatments to reduce aortic growth. A recently published patient-level meta-analysis confirmed that angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers have a similar effect on reducing the rate of increase of the aortic root Z score, used singularly or as add-on therapy. Considering the current evidence on new features related with MFS (such as mitral annular disjunction - MAD) bearing a potential additional increased arrhythmic risk, it is of paramount importance to establish the role of beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in clinical endpoints of this population as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-based cardiovascular prevention in patients with Marfan Syndrome: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Rita Pavasini, Federico Sanguettoli, Maria A Deserio, Nicola Bianchi, Luca Zanarelli, Gioele Fabbri, Elisabetta Tonet, Giulia Passarini, Matteo Serenelli, Gianluca Campo\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06184-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a rare and complex genetic disorder associated with increased aortic growth and aortic disease. The effectiveness of cardiovascular medical therapies aiming to slow down aortic growth has been tested in several trials, particularly beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers, however showing conflicting results.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We conducted a systematic review on PubMed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Biomed Central databases between January and February 2022. We selected relevant articles focusing on patients with MFS treated with beta-blockers, angiotensin receptors blockers, or both, and reporting data on the effect of the drugs on 1) slowing down aortic dilatation; 2) the reduction of aortic complication (aortic dissection, mortality, aortic surgery); and with a 3) follow-up length of at least two years. A total of 16 studies were selected.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Beta-blockers remain the mainstay of therapy as they have proven to slow aortic enlargement. Angiotensin receptor blockers are a useful alternative and with proven benefit as an add-on therapy to limit aortic growth. Neither beta-blockers, nor angiotensin receptor blockers have shown meaningful results on clinical aortic endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence of pharmacological treatment for MFS patients is conflicting due to the lack of large, randomized clinical trials with adequate follow-up studies and homogeneous age grouping. Beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are the only available treatments to reduce aortic growth. A recently published patient-level meta-analysis confirmed that angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers have a similar effect on reducing the rate of increase of the aortic root Z score, used singularly or as add-on therapy. Considering the current evidence on new features related with MFS (such as mitral annular disjunction - MAD) bearing a potential additional increased arrhythmic risk, it is of paramount importance to establish the role of beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in clinical endpoints of this population as well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06184-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06184-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马凡氏综合征(MFS)是一种罕见和复杂的遗传性疾病,与主动脉生长增加和主动脉疾病相关。旨在减缓主动脉生长的心血管医学疗法的有效性已经在几个试验中进行了测试,特别是β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,然而显示出相互矛盾的结果。证据获取:我们在2022年1月至2月期间对PubMed (Medline)、Cochrane图书馆、Google Scholar和Biomed Central数据库进行了系统评价。我们选择了相关的文章,聚焦于使用-受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或两者同时治疗的MFS患者,并报道了这些药物对1)减缓主动脉扩张的影响;2)减少主动脉并发症(主动脉夹层、死亡率、主动脉手术);随访时间至少为两年。共选择了16项研究。证据综合:β受体阻滞剂仍然是治疗的主流,因为它们已被证明可以减缓主动脉扩张。血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是一种有用的替代方法,作为限制主动脉生长的附加治疗已被证明有益。受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在临床主动脉终点均未显示出有意义的结果。结论:目前MFS患者的药物治疗证据是相互矛盾的,因为缺乏大规模的随机临床试验和足够的随访研究和均匀的年龄组。受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是唯一可用的治疗方法,以减少主动脉生长。最近发表的一项患者水平的荟萃分析证实,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂在降低主动脉根部Z评分的增加率方面具有相似的效果,单独使用或作为附加治疗。考虑到目前与MFS相关的新特征(如二尖瓣环分离- MAD)具有潜在的额外增加的心律失常风险的证据,确定β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在该人群的临床终点中的作用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug-based cardiovascular prevention in patients with Marfan Syndrome: a systematic review.

Introduction: Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a rare and complex genetic disorder associated with increased aortic growth and aortic disease. The effectiveness of cardiovascular medical therapies aiming to slow down aortic growth has been tested in several trials, particularly beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers, however showing conflicting results.

Evidence acquisition: We conducted a systematic review on PubMed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Biomed Central databases between January and February 2022. We selected relevant articles focusing on patients with MFS treated with beta-blockers, angiotensin receptors blockers, or both, and reporting data on the effect of the drugs on 1) slowing down aortic dilatation; 2) the reduction of aortic complication (aortic dissection, mortality, aortic surgery); and with a 3) follow-up length of at least two years. A total of 16 studies were selected.

Evidence synthesis: Beta-blockers remain the mainstay of therapy as they have proven to slow aortic enlargement. Angiotensin receptor blockers are a useful alternative and with proven benefit as an add-on therapy to limit aortic growth. Neither beta-blockers, nor angiotensin receptor blockers have shown meaningful results on clinical aortic endpoints.

Conclusions: The current evidence of pharmacological treatment for MFS patients is conflicting due to the lack of large, randomized clinical trials with adequate follow-up studies and homogeneous age grouping. Beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are the only available treatments to reduce aortic growth. A recently published patient-level meta-analysis confirmed that angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers have a similar effect on reducing the rate of increase of the aortic root Z score, used singularly or as add-on therapy. Considering the current evidence on new features related with MFS (such as mitral annular disjunction - MAD) bearing a potential additional increased arrhythmic risk, it is of paramount importance to establish the role of beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in clinical endpoints of this population as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信