与记录振动相比,带限噪声、单正弦和多正弦的感知粗糙度*

U. A. Alma, M. Altinsoy
{"title":"与记录振动相比,带限噪声、单正弦和多正弦的感知粗糙度*","authors":"U. A. Alma, M. Altinsoy","doi":"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, perceived roughness of four types of tactile vibration was evaluated on a tactile display. The four tactile stimuli are 1) recorded vibration, 2) band-limited noise, 3) multiple sinusoids, and 4) single sinusoid. The aim was to investigate and present simplification possibilities on recorded vibration without losing its perceptual capacity since it might provide over-sophisticated information except for too fine textures. In order to test and compare several simplifications, similarity estimation experiment was conducted using continuous equal interval scaling method. During the experiment, the participants actively explored the real textures so that they could rate the roughness similarity of four tactile stimuli with respect to the real textures. The utilized textures were selected so as to contain the varying size of spatial densities to analyze the simplification approaches over fine, not too fine and coarse textures. Based on the similarity ratings and the multidimensional scaling, recorded vibration and band-limited noise stimuli were found as the most similar stimuli with fine textures while single sinusoid and multiple sinusoids were found as the most similar stimuli with coarse textures. Also based on the one-way analysis of variance tests, significant differences between the tactile stimuli were found for fine and coarse textures while a significant difference was not found between them for mid-coarse textures.","PeriodicalId":6702,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","volume":"5 8","pages":"337-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Roughness of Band-Limited Noise, Single, and Multiple Sinusoids Compared to Recorded Vibration*\",\"authors\":\"U. A. Alma, M. Altinsoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, perceived roughness of four types of tactile vibration was evaluated on a tactile display. The four tactile stimuli are 1) recorded vibration, 2) band-limited noise, 3) multiple sinusoids, and 4) single sinusoid. The aim was to investigate and present simplification possibilities on recorded vibration without losing its perceptual capacity since it might provide over-sophisticated information except for too fine textures. In order to test and compare several simplifications, similarity estimation experiment was conducted using continuous equal interval scaling method. During the experiment, the participants actively explored the real textures so that they could rate the roughness similarity of four tactile stimuli with respect to the real textures. The utilized textures were selected so as to contain the varying size of spatial densities to analyze the simplification approaches over fine, not too fine and coarse textures. Based on the similarity ratings and the multidimensional scaling, recorded vibration and band-limited noise stimuli were found as the most similar stimuli with fine textures while single sinusoid and multiple sinusoids were found as the most similar stimuli with coarse textures. Also based on the one-way analysis of variance tests, significant differences between the tactile stimuli were found for fine and coarse textures while a significant difference was not found between them for mid-coarse textures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"volume\":\"5 8\",\"pages\":\"337-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文在触觉显示器上对四种触觉振动的感知粗糙度进行了评价。四种触觉刺激分别是:1)记录振动;2)带限噪声;3)多重正弦波;4)单一正弦波。目的是研究和呈现记录振动的简化可能性,而不失去其感知能力,因为它可能提供过于复杂的信息,除了过于精细的纹理。为了检验和比较几种简化方法,采用连续等区间标度法进行了相似度估计实验。在实验过程中,参与者积极探索真实的纹理,以便他们可以评估四种触觉刺激相对于真实纹理的粗糙度相似性。选取包含不同空间密度大小的纹理,分析细纹理、不细纹理和粗纹理的简化方法。基于相似度评分和多维标度,记录振动和带限噪声刺激在纹理较细的情况下相似度最高,而单正弦和多正弦刺激在纹理较粗的情况下相似度最高。在单因素方差分析的基础上,细、粗纹理的触觉刺激差异显著,中粗纹理的触觉刺激差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived Roughness of Band-Limited Noise, Single, and Multiple Sinusoids Compared to Recorded Vibration*
In this paper, perceived roughness of four types of tactile vibration was evaluated on a tactile display. The four tactile stimuli are 1) recorded vibration, 2) band-limited noise, 3) multiple sinusoids, and 4) single sinusoid. The aim was to investigate and present simplification possibilities on recorded vibration without losing its perceptual capacity since it might provide over-sophisticated information except for too fine textures. In order to test and compare several simplifications, similarity estimation experiment was conducted using continuous equal interval scaling method. During the experiment, the participants actively explored the real textures so that they could rate the roughness similarity of four tactile stimuli with respect to the real textures. The utilized textures were selected so as to contain the varying size of spatial densities to analyze the simplification approaches over fine, not too fine and coarse textures. Based on the similarity ratings and the multidimensional scaling, recorded vibration and band-limited noise stimuli were found as the most similar stimuli with fine textures while single sinusoid and multiple sinusoids were found as the most similar stimuli with coarse textures. Also based on the one-way analysis of variance tests, significant differences between the tactile stimuli were found for fine and coarse textures while a significant difference was not found between them for mid-coarse textures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信