只是一个普通的犹太人

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Larsson
{"title":"只是一个普通的犹太人","authors":"S. Larsson","doi":"10.30752/NJ.73240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The apostle Paul, author of many letters in the New Testament, is often considered to be the father of Christian antisemitism and a staunch opponent of keeping the Torah. This perspective has been shared both by Jews and Christians throughout the centuries, until the late twentieth century. For the last forty years or so, a new paradigm on Paul has taken shape, one where Jewish scholarship and research on ancient Judaism is making a significant difference. The picture of a Second Temple-period Pharisee is emerging, possibly with connections to early forms of Merkabah mysticism. There are no longer any reasons but ‘tradition’ that Paul should not be a part of Jewish studies, and this article gives some of the arguments for this timely re-appropriation of one of the best-known Jews in history.","PeriodicalId":41057,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Judaistik-Scandinavian Jewish Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Just an ordinary Jew\",\"authors\":\"S. Larsson\",\"doi\":\"10.30752/NJ.73240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The apostle Paul, author of many letters in the New Testament, is often considered to be the father of Christian antisemitism and a staunch opponent of keeping the Torah. This perspective has been shared both by Jews and Christians throughout the centuries, until the late twentieth century. For the last forty years or so, a new paradigm on Paul has taken shape, one where Jewish scholarship and research on ancient Judaism is making a significant difference. The picture of a Second Temple-period Pharisee is emerging, possibly with connections to early forms of Merkabah mysticism. There are no longer any reasons but ‘tradition’ that Paul should not be a part of Jewish studies, and this article gives some of the arguments for this timely re-appropriation of one of the best-known Jews in history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordisk Judaistik-Scandinavian Jewish Studies\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordisk Judaistik-Scandinavian Jewish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30752/NJ.73240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Judaistik-Scandinavian Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30752/NJ.73240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使徒保罗是《新约》中许多信件的作者,通常被认为是基督教反犹主义之父,也是保留《托拉》的坚定反对者。这一观点在几个世纪以来一直为犹太人和基督徒所认同,直到二十世纪后期。在过去的四十年左右,一个关于保罗的新范式已经形成,在这个范式中,犹太学术和对古代犹太教的研究产生了重大影响。第二圣殿时期法利赛人的形象正在浮现,可能与梅尔卡巴神秘主义的早期形式有关。不再有任何理由,但“传统”,保罗不应该是犹太人研究的一部分,这篇文章给出了一些论据,适时地重新挪用历史上最著名的犹太人之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Just an ordinary Jew
The apostle Paul, author of many letters in the New Testament, is often considered to be the father of Christian antisemitism and a staunch opponent of keeping the Torah. This perspective has been shared both by Jews and Christians throughout the centuries, until the late twentieth century. For the last forty years or so, a new paradigm on Paul has taken shape, one where Jewish scholarship and research on ancient Judaism is making a significant difference. The picture of a Second Temple-period Pharisee is emerging, possibly with connections to early forms of Merkabah mysticism. There are no longer any reasons but ‘tradition’ that Paul should not be a part of Jewish studies, and this article gives some of the arguments for this timely re-appropriation of one of the best-known Jews in history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordisk Judaistik-Scandinavian Jewish Studies
Nordisk Judaistik-Scandinavian Jewish Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信