{"title":"格陵兰海和挪威海co2的年际变化","authors":"I. Skjelvan, T. Johannessen, L. Miller","doi":"10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I2.16327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The f CO 2 in the Greenland and Norwegian Seas surface water varied significantly during the period from 1995 to 1997. Comparison of f CO 2 data from winter 1995 with data from winter 1997 showed that sea surface f CO 2 decreased between these winters by 20–30 μatm in the central Greenland Sea, and the potential CO 2 uptake during the winters of 1995 and 1997 was 3.9·10 −3 Gt C month −1 and 5.9·10 −3 Gt C month −1 (based on Wanninkhof ′s relationship for the gas transfer coeYcient), respectively. This difference in CO 2 fluxes can be attributed to lower sea surface temperatures and more extensive sea ice cover in 1997, and these observations were related to increased convection in the Greenland Sea during winter 1997. Larger amplitudes in the seasonal variations of CO 2 flux were also seen during the other seasons in the period 1996–97, compared to 1995. Over the years of investigation in the Greenland Sea, the carbon flux showed an increasing trend of 9·10 −4 Gt C yr −1 into the ocean, which may be related to the anthropogenic input of carbon to the atmosphere. The Greenland and Norwegian Seas appear to be sinks for atmospheric CO 2 and together absorb approximately 0.12 ± 0.015 Gt C yr −1 . DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.00024.x","PeriodicalId":54432,"journal":{"name":"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology","volume":"1971 1","pages":"477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interannual variability of f CO 2 in the Greenland and Norwegian Seas\",\"authors\":\"I. Skjelvan, T. Johannessen, L. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I2.16327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The f CO 2 in the Greenland and Norwegian Seas surface water varied significantly during the period from 1995 to 1997. Comparison of f CO 2 data from winter 1995 with data from winter 1997 showed that sea surface f CO 2 decreased between these winters by 20–30 μatm in the central Greenland Sea, and the potential CO 2 uptake during the winters of 1995 and 1997 was 3.9·10 −3 Gt C month −1 and 5.9·10 −3 Gt C month −1 (based on Wanninkhof ′s relationship for the gas transfer coeYcient), respectively. This difference in CO 2 fluxes can be attributed to lower sea surface temperatures and more extensive sea ice cover in 1997, and these observations were related to increased convection in the Greenland Sea during winter 1997. Larger amplitudes in the seasonal variations of CO 2 flux were also seen during the other seasons in the period 1996–97, compared to 1995. Over the years of investigation in the Greenland Sea, the carbon flux showed an increasing trend of 9·10 −4 Gt C yr −1 into the ocean, which may be related to the anthropogenic input of carbon to the atmosphere. The Greenland and Norwegian Seas appear to be sinks for atmospheric CO 2 and together absorb approximately 0.12 ± 0.015 Gt C yr −1 . DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.00024.x\",\"PeriodicalId\":54432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"1971 1\",\"pages\":\"477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I2.16327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I2.16327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interannual variability of f CO 2 in the Greenland and Norwegian Seas
The f CO 2 in the Greenland and Norwegian Seas surface water varied significantly during the period from 1995 to 1997. Comparison of f CO 2 data from winter 1995 with data from winter 1997 showed that sea surface f CO 2 decreased between these winters by 20–30 μatm in the central Greenland Sea, and the potential CO 2 uptake during the winters of 1995 and 1997 was 3.9·10 −3 Gt C month −1 and 5.9·10 −3 Gt C month −1 (based on Wanninkhof ′s relationship for the gas transfer coeYcient), respectively. This difference in CO 2 fluxes can be attributed to lower sea surface temperatures and more extensive sea ice cover in 1997, and these observations were related to increased convection in the Greenland Sea during winter 1997. Larger amplitudes in the seasonal variations of CO 2 flux were also seen during the other seasons in the period 1996–97, compared to 1995. Over the years of investigation in the Greenland Sea, the carbon flux showed an increasing trend of 9·10 −4 Gt C yr −1 into the ocean, which may be related to the anthropogenic input of carbon to the atmosphere. The Greenland and Norwegian Seas appear to be sinks for atmospheric CO 2 and together absorb approximately 0.12 ± 0.015 Gt C yr −1 . DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.00024.x
期刊介绍:
Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology along with its sister journal Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, are the international, peer-reviewed journals of the International Meteorological Institute in Stockholm, an independent non-for-profit body integrated into the Department of Meteorology at the Faculty of Sciences of Stockholm University, Sweden. Aiming to promote the exchange of knowledge about meteorology from across a range of scientific sub-disciplines, the two journals serve an international community of researchers, policy makers, managers, media and the general public.