给孩子分药片——好还是坏?

Å. Andersson, S. Lindemalm, S. Eksborg
{"title":"给孩子分药片——好还是坏?","authors":"Å. Andersson, S. Lindemalm, S. Eksborg","doi":"10.5530/PHM.2016.7.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To investigate the dosing accuracy using split tablets in paediatric patients. Methods: Five brands of tablets (Alvedon ® (paracetamol), Catapresan ® (clonidine), Hydrocortone ® (hydrocortisone), Prednisolon ® (prednisolon) and Tavegyl ® (clemastine) were split into halves and quarters by hand or by using a tablet splitter. The resulting halves and quarters were weighed. Results: Three out of the five tablet brands passed the test in the Ph. Eur. (European Pharmacopoeia) for subdivision of tablets when split once and when split twice to yield quarters only one of the tablets passed the test. When also applying the limit for relative standard deviation (RSD) from the US Pharmacopoeia only one of the tablet halves passed and the other two was just outside the limit. None of the tablet quarters passed the RSD limit. Conclusion : Our results indicate that tablets larger than 8 mm might be split once. Tablets should not be split more than once, due to uncertainty in dose accuracy. There is a need for more commercially available age-appropriate formulations. Extemporaneously prepared formulations should be considered as an alternative to the use of split tablets. Key words:  Dosing accuracy, Manipulation of drugs, Paediatric patients, Subdivision of tablets, Tablet splitting","PeriodicalId":19960,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Methods","volume":"1 1","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dividing the Tablets for Children – Good or Bad?\",\"authors\":\"Å. Andersson, S. Lindemalm, S. Eksborg\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/PHM.2016.7.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: To investigate the dosing accuracy using split tablets in paediatric patients. Methods: Five brands of tablets (Alvedon ® (paracetamol), Catapresan ® (clonidine), Hydrocortone ® (hydrocortisone), Prednisolon ® (prednisolon) and Tavegyl ® (clemastine) were split into halves and quarters by hand or by using a tablet splitter. The resulting halves and quarters were weighed. Results: Three out of the five tablet brands passed the test in the Ph. Eur. (European Pharmacopoeia) for subdivision of tablets when split once and when split twice to yield quarters only one of the tablets passed the test. When also applying the limit for relative standard deviation (RSD) from the US Pharmacopoeia only one of the tablet halves passed and the other two was just outside the limit. None of the tablet quarters passed the RSD limit. Conclusion : Our results indicate that tablets larger than 8 mm might be split once. Tablets should not be split more than once, due to uncertainty in dose accuracy. There is a need for more commercially available age-appropriate formulations. Extemporaneously prepared formulations should be considered as an alternative to the use of split tablets. Key words:  Dosing accuracy, Manipulation of drugs, Paediatric patients, Subdivision of tablets, Tablet splitting\",\"PeriodicalId\":19960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Methods\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"23-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/PHM.2016.7.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/PHM.2016.7.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

前言:探讨小儿患者使用分裂片给药的准确性。方法:将5个品牌的片剂(Alvedon®(扑热息痛)、Catapresan®(可乐定)、Hydrocortone®(氢化可的松)、Prednisolon®(强的松)和Tavegyl®(克莱mastine)分别用手或分离机拆分为两半和四分之一。对得到的两半和四分之一进行称重。结果:五个片剂品牌中有三个通过了欧盟的测试。(欧洲药典),当片剂分裂一次和分裂两次产生四分之一时,只有一个片剂通过了测试。当同样应用美国药典的相对标准偏差(RSD)限值时,只有一半的片剂通过,另外两部分刚好超出限值。四分之一的平板电脑都没有超过RSD限制。结论:8mm以上的片剂可一次分裂。由于剂量准确性不确定,片剂不应分裂超过一次。需要有更多适合年龄的商用配方。应考虑将临时配制的制剂作为使用分裂片剂的替代方法。关键词:给药准确性,药物操作,儿科患者,片剂细分,片剂拆分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dividing the Tablets for Children – Good or Bad?
Introduction: To investigate the dosing accuracy using split tablets in paediatric patients. Methods: Five brands of tablets (Alvedon ® (paracetamol), Catapresan ® (clonidine), Hydrocortone ® (hydrocortisone), Prednisolon ® (prednisolon) and Tavegyl ® (clemastine) were split into halves and quarters by hand or by using a tablet splitter. The resulting halves and quarters were weighed. Results: Three out of the five tablet brands passed the test in the Ph. Eur. (European Pharmacopoeia) for subdivision of tablets when split once and when split twice to yield quarters only one of the tablets passed the test. When also applying the limit for relative standard deviation (RSD) from the US Pharmacopoeia only one of the tablet halves passed and the other two was just outside the limit. None of the tablet quarters passed the RSD limit. Conclusion : Our results indicate that tablets larger than 8 mm might be split once. Tablets should not be split more than once, due to uncertainty in dose accuracy. There is a need for more commercially available age-appropriate formulations. Extemporaneously prepared formulations should be considered as an alternative to the use of split tablets. Key words:  Dosing accuracy, Manipulation of drugs, Paediatric patients, Subdivision of tablets, Tablet splitting
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信