压力管理支持的二氧化碳储存耦合流体力学模拟证明了同时提取地层流体的协同效益

T. Kempka, C. M. Nielsen, P. Frykman, Ji‐Quan Shi, G. Bacci, F. Dalhoff
{"title":"压力管理支持的二氧化碳储存耦合流体力学模拟证明了同时提取地层流体的协同效益","authors":"T. Kempka, C. M. Nielsen, P. Frykman, Ji‐Quan Shi, G. Bacci, F. Dalhoff","doi":"10.2516/OGST/2014029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assessed the synergetic benefits of simultaneous formation fluid extraction during CO 2 injection for reservoir pressure management by coupled hydro-mechanical simulations at the prospective Vedsted storage site located in northern Denmark. Effectiveness of reservoir pressure management was investigated by simulation of CO 2 storage without any fluid extraction as well as with 66% and 100% equivalent volume formation fluid extraction from four wells positioned for geothermal heat recovery. Simulation results demonstrate that a total pressure reduction of up to about 1.1 MPa can be achieved at the injection well. Furthermore, the areal pressure perturbation in the storage reservoir can be significantly decreased compared to the simulation scenario without any formation fluid extraction. Following a stress regime analysis, two stress regimes were considered in the coupled hydro-mechanical simulations indicating that the maximum ground surface uplift is about 0.24 m in the absence of any reservoir pressure management. However, a ground uplift mitigation of up to 37.3% (from 0.24 m to 0.15 m) can be achieved at the injection well by 100% equivalent volume formation fluid extraction. Well-based adaptation of fluid extraction rates can support achieving zero displacements at the proposed formation fluid extraction wells located close to urban infrastructure. Since shear and tensile failure do not occur under both stress regimes for all investigated scenarios, it is concluded that a safe operation of CO 2 injection with simultaneous formation fluid extraction for geothermal heat recovery can be implemented at the Vedsted site.","PeriodicalId":19444,"journal":{"name":"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole","volume":"1 1","pages":"599-613"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Simulations of CO2 Storage Supported by Pressure Management Demonstrate Synergy Benefits from Simultaneous Formation Fluid Extraction\",\"authors\":\"T. Kempka, C. M. Nielsen, P. Frykman, Ji‐Quan Shi, G. Bacci, F. Dalhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.2516/OGST/2014029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We assessed the synergetic benefits of simultaneous formation fluid extraction during CO 2 injection for reservoir pressure management by coupled hydro-mechanical simulations at the prospective Vedsted storage site located in northern Denmark. Effectiveness of reservoir pressure management was investigated by simulation of CO 2 storage without any fluid extraction as well as with 66% and 100% equivalent volume formation fluid extraction from four wells positioned for geothermal heat recovery. Simulation results demonstrate that a total pressure reduction of up to about 1.1 MPa can be achieved at the injection well. Furthermore, the areal pressure perturbation in the storage reservoir can be significantly decreased compared to the simulation scenario without any formation fluid extraction. Following a stress regime analysis, two stress regimes were considered in the coupled hydro-mechanical simulations indicating that the maximum ground surface uplift is about 0.24 m in the absence of any reservoir pressure management. However, a ground uplift mitigation of up to 37.3% (from 0.24 m to 0.15 m) can be achieved at the injection well by 100% equivalent volume formation fluid extraction. Well-based adaptation of fluid extraction rates can support achieving zero displacements at the proposed formation fluid extraction wells located close to urban infrastructure. Since shear and tensile failure do not occur under both stress regimes for all investigated scenarios, it is concluded that a safe operation of CO 2 injection with simultaneous formation fluid extraction for geothermal heat recovery can be implemented at the Vedsted site.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"599-613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2516/OGST/2014029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2516/OGST/2014029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在丹麦北部的Vedsted储层,通过耦合流体力学模拟,我们评估了在注入二氧化碳期间同时提取地层流体对储层压力管理的协同效益。通过模拟不抽取流体的co2储存情况,以及对4口地热采热井进行66%和100%当量体积地层流体抽取,研究了储层压力管理的有效性。模拟结果表明,注水井的总压可降低约1.1 MPa。此外,与不抽取地层流体的模拟情景相比,储层的面压扰动可以显著降低。在应力状态分析之后,在耦合的水-力学模拟中考虑了两种应力状态,表明在没有任何油藏压力管理的情况下,地表最大抬升约为0.24 m。然而,通过100%当量体积地层流体的提取,可以在注入井中实现高达37.3%的地面隆起缓解(从0.24 m到0.15 m)。在靠近城市基础设施的地层流体提取井中,基于井的流体提取速率适应性可以支持实现零排量。由于在两种应力状态下都不会发生剪切和拉伸破坏,因此可以得出结论,在Vedsted现场可以实施安全的CO 2注入操作,同时抽取地层流体进行地热回收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Simulations of CO2 Storage Supported by Pressure Management Demonstrate Synergy Benefits from Simultaneous Formation Fluid Extraction
We assessed the synergetic benefits of simultaneous formation fluid extraction during CO 2 injection for reservoir pressure management by coupled hydro-mechanical simulations at the prospective Vedsted storage site located in northern Denmark. Effectiveness of reservoir pressure management was investigated by simulation of CO 2 storage without any fluid extraction as well as with 66% and 100% equivalent volume formation fluid extraction from four wells positioned for geothermal heat recovery. Simulation results demonstrate that a total pressure reduction of up to about 1.1 MPa can be achieved at the injection well. Furthermore, the areal pressure perturbation in the storage reservoir can be significantly decreased compared to the simulation scenario without any formation fluid extraction. Following a stress regime analysis, two stress regimes were considered in the coupled hydro-mechanical simulations indicating that the maximum ground surface uplift is about 0.24 m in the absence of any reservoir pressure management. However, a ground uplift mitigation of up to 37.3% (from 0.24 m to 0.15 m) can be achieved at the injection well by 100% equivalent volume formation fluid extraction. Well-based adaptation of fluid extraction rates can support achieving zero displacements at the proposed formation fluid extraction wells located close to urban infrastructure. Since shear and tensile failure do not occur under both stress regimes for all investigated scenarios, it is concluded that a safe operation of CO 2 injection with simultaneous formation fluid extraction for geothermal heat recovery can be implemented at the Vedsted site.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信