课堂管理中基于问题的学习模式:基于学习成果和学生独立性的脚手架技术

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Asrial, Silvina Noviyanti, D. A. Kurniawan*, N. Kiska, Juwita Saputri, Latipia Damayanti, Qonita Luthfiah, Ninda Silvia
{"title":"课堂管理中基于问题的学习模式:基于学习成果和学生独立性的脚手架技术","authors":"A. Asrial, Silvina Noviyanti, D. A. Kurniawan*, N. Kiska, Juwita Saputri, Latipia Damayanti, Qonita Luthfiah, Ninda Silvia","doi":"10.23887/ijee.v5i4.39621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are still many students who get scores below the average. It is because students have difficulty in learning. This study examines the effect of problem-based learning models with scaffolding techniques, the effect of independent learning on student learning outcomes, and the level of differences in learning outcomes between students who apply problem-based learning models and problem-based learning models with scaffolding techniques rather than conventional learning models. This study uses a quantitative research type with a quasi-experimental design with a 3 x 3 factorial design, using a Nonequevalent control group design (pretest-posttest). The sample in this study amounted to 77 students. The study was conducted using quantitative data obtained from questionnaires and surveys. The instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. The techniques used to analyze the data are qualitative descriptive analysis, quantitative, and inferential statistics. The study results are significant differences between the Problem Based Learning learning model with the Scaffolding technique with the conventional learning model of student independence in learning, and student learning outcomes are dominant in the application of problem-based learning. It can be concluded that the application of the Problem Based Learning model with the Scaffolding technique obtains the best learning outcomes when compared to other learning models.","PeriodicalId":39088,"journal":{"name":"International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem-Based Learning Model in Classroom Management with Scaffolding Techniques on Learning Outcomes and Student Independence\",\"authors\":\"A. Asrial, Silvina Noviyanti, D. A. Kurniawan*, N. Kiska, Juwita Saputri, Latipia Damayanti, Qonita Luthfiah, Ninda Silvia\",\"doi\":\"10.23887/ijee.v5i4.39621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are still many students who get scores below the average. It is because students have difficulty in learning. This study examines the effect of problem-based learning models with scaffolding techniques, the effect of independent learning on student learning outcomes, and the level of differences in learning outcomes between students who apply problem-based learning models and problem-based learning models with scaffolding techniques rather than conventional learning models. This study uses a quantitative research type with a quasi-experimental design with a 3 x 3 factorial design, using a Nonequevalent control group design (pretest-posttest). The sample in this study amounted to 77 students. The study was conducted using quantitative data obtained from questionnaires and surveys. The instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. The techniques used to analyze the data are qualitative descriptive analysis, quantitative, and inferential statistics. The study results are significant differences between the Problem Based Learning learning model with the Scaffolding technique with the conventional learning model of student independence in learning, and student learning outcomes are dominant in the application of problem-based learning. It can be concluded that the application of the Problem Based Learning model with the Scaffolding technique obtains the best learning outcomes when compared to other learning models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i4.39621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i4.39621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

仍然有许多学生的分数低于平均水平。这是因为学生在学习上有困难。本研究考察了基于问题的学习模式与脚手架技术的效果,自主学习对学生学习成果的影响,以及应用基于问题的学习模式与基于问题的学习模式与脚手架技术而非传统学习模式的学生在学习成果上的差异程度。本研究采用定量研究类型,采用准实验设计,3 × 3因子设计,采用非等效对照组设计(前测后测)。本研究的样本共计77名学生。该研究使用从问卷和调查中获得的定量数据进行。用来收集数据的工具是问卷调查。用于分析数据的技术有定性、描述性分析、定量和推理统计。研究结果表明,采用脚手架技术的基于问题的学习模式与学生自主学习的传统学习模式存在显著差异,学生的学习成果在基于问题的学习的应用中占主导地位。可以得出结论,与其他学习模型相比,基于问题的学习模型与脚手架技术的应用获得了最好的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problem-Based Learning Model in Classroom Management with Scaffolding Techniques on Learning Outcomes and Student Independence
There are still many students who get scores below the average. It is because students have difficulty in learning. This study examines the effect of problem-based learning models with scaffolding techniques, the effect of independent learning on student learning outcomes, and the level of differences in learning outcomes between students who apply problem-based learning models and problem-based learning models with scaffolding techniques rather than conventional learning models. This study uses a quantitative research type with a quasi-experimental design with a 3 x 3 factorial design, using a Nonequevalent control group design (pretest-posttest). The sample in this study amounted to 77 students. The study was conducted using quantitative data obtained from questionnaires and surveys. The instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. The techniques used to analyze the data are qualitative descriptive analysis, quantitative, and inferential statistics. The study results are significant differences between the Problem Based Learning learning model with the Scaffolding technique with the conventional learning model of student independence in learning, and student learning outcomes are dominant in the application of problem-based learning. It can be concluded that the application of the Problem Based Learning model with the Scaffolding technique obtains the best learning outcomes when compared to other learning models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, IEJEE provides a platform for the publication of scientific research in the all areas of education on elementary grades. IEJEE is a multidisciplinary journal, committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology or paradigm. It is concerned with elementary education in general and devoted to all concerned with elementary education. IEJEE welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of elementary education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信