以人为本的卫生和社会保健概念理解的进展。“以人为本的关怀:先进的哲学观点”。Loughlin, M. & Miles, A.(主编)。2020. 伦敦:埃斯库拉皮乌斯医学出版社。

J. Asbridge
{"title":"以人为本的卫生和社会保健概念理解的进展。“以人为本的关怀:先进的哲学观点”。Loughlin, M. & Miles, A.(主编)。2020. 伦敦:埃斯库拉皮乌斯医学出版社。","authors":"J. Asbridge","doi":"10.5750/EJPCH.V8I1.1799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue of the Journal, we begin the serialisation of a seminal new text which has significantly advanced current understandings of the conceptual basis of person-centered care (PCC) [1]. The volume, edited by Michael Loughlin and Andrew Miles, brings together 42 distinguished scholars, writing over the course of 28 chapters, divided into 6 definitive sections, spanning some 420 pages of text. Each of the chapters has distinct merit and, when studied collectively, the scale of their contribution to current thinking in the field becomes quickly apparent. The volume is scheduled for production towards the end of the current year and will be published by Aesculapius Medical Press (AMP), the publishing Imprint of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare (ESPCH). A detailed overview of the volume has been provided by Loughlin, the lead co-editor of the book [2]. Loughlin’s paper [2] is a model of clarity, providing admirable insight into the content of the individual chapters, placing each of them within the context of the ongoing debate. As Loughlin [2] rightly notes, “the ideas and terminology of person-centred care ... have been part of health discourse for a very long time ... (and) ... arguments that in healthcare one treats the whole person, not her/his component parts, date back at least to antiquity” (italicisation mine). He emphasises that “... it is only in recent years that we have seen a growing consensus in health policy and practice literature that PCC, and associated ideas including patient expertise, co-production and shared decision-making, are not simply fine ideals or ethical add-ons to sound scientific clinical practice, but rather they represent indispensable components of any genuinely integrated, realistic and conceptually sound account of healthcare practice” (italicisations mine). These observations, indeed truisms, explain the rationale which underpinned the creation of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare, and which continue to direct its mission.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"57 1","pages":"17-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress in the conceptual understanding of person-centered health and social care. ‘Person Centered Care: Advanced Philosophical Perspectives’. Loughlin, M. & Miles, A. (Eds). 2020. London: Aesculapius Medical Press.\",\"authors\":\"J. Asbridge\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/EJPCH.V8I1.1799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this issue of the Journal, we begin the serialisation of a seminal new text which has significantly advanced current understandings of the conceptual basis of person-centered care (PCC) [1]. The volume, edited by Michael Loughlin and Andrew Miles, brings together 42 distinguished scholars, writing over the course of 28 chapters, divided into 6 definitive sections, spanning some 420 pages of text. Each of the chapters has distinct merit and, when studied collectively, the scale of their contribution to current thinking in the field becomes quickly apparent. The volume is scheduled for production towards the end of the current year and will be published by Aesculapius Medical Press (AMP), the publishing Imprint of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare (ESPCH). A detailed overview of the volume has been provided by Loughlin, the lead co-editor of the book [2]. Loughlin’s paper [2] is a model of clarity, providing admirable insight into the content of the individual chapters, placing each of them within the context of the ongoing debate. As Loughlin [2] rightly notes, “the ideas and terminology of person-centred care ... have been part of health discourse for a very long time ... (and) ... arguments that in healthcare one treats the whole person, not her/his component parts, date back at least to antiquity” (italicisation mine). He emphasises that “... it is only in recent years that we have seen a growing consensus in health policy and practice literature that PCC, and associated ideas including patient expertise, co-production and shared decision-making, are not simply fine ideals or ethical add-ons to sound scientific clinical practice, but rather they represent indispensable components of any genuinely integrated, realistic and conceptually sound account of healthcare practice” (italicisations mine). These observations, indeed truisms, explain the rationale which underpinned the creation of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare, and which continue to direct its mission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal for person centered healthcare\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"17-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal for person centered healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V8I1.1799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V8I1.1799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在本期杂志中,我们开始了一个开创性的新文本的连载,该文本显著推进了当前对以人为本的护理(PCC)概念基础的理解[1]。这本书由迈克尔·拉夫林和安德鲁·迈尔斯编辑,汇集了42位杰出的学者,在28章的过程中写作,分为6个决定性的部分,跨度约420页的文本。每一章都有其独特的优点,当集体研究时,它们对该领域当前思想的贡献规模很快就会变得明显。该卷计划在今年年底前生产,并将由Aesculapius医学出版社(AMP)出版,该出版社是欧洲以人为中心的医疗保健协会(ESPCH)的出版印记。本书的主要联合编辑Loughlin[2]提供了该卷的详细概述。Loughlin的论文[2]是一个清晰的模型,对单个章节的内容提供了令人钦佩的洞察力,并将每个章节置于正在进行的辩论的背景下。正如Loughlin[2]正确指出的那样,“以人为本的护理的理念和术语……一直是健康话题的一部分…(与)…有观点认为,在医疗保健中,人们治疗的是整个人,而不是他/她的组成部分,这种观点至少可以追溯到古代。他强调“……直到最近几年,我们才在卫生政策和实践文献中看到越来越多的共识,即PCC以及相关的想法,包括患者专业知识、合作生产和共同决策,不仅仅是良好的理想或合理的科学临床实践的道德附加,而是代表任何真正整合的、现实的、概念上合理的医疗实践的不可缺少的组成部分。”这些观察结果,确实是老生常谈,解释了欧洲以人为本的医疗保健协会创建的基本原理,并继续指导其使命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progress in the conceptual understanding of person-centered health and social care. ‘Person Centered Care: Advanced Philosophical Perspectives’. Loughlin, M. & Miles, A. (Eds). 2020. London: Aesculapius Medical Press.
In this issue of the Journal, we begin the serialisation of a seminal new text which has significantly advanced current understandings of the conceptual basis of person-centered care (PCC) [1]. The volume, edited by Michael Loughlin and Andrew Miles, brings together 42 distinguished scholars, writing over the course of 28 chapters, divided into 6 definitive sections, spanning some 420 pages of text. Each of the chapters has distinct merit and, when studied collectively, the scale of their contribution to current thinking in the field becomes quickly apparent. The volume is scheduled for production towards the end of the current year and will be published by Aesculapius Medical Press (AMP), the publishing Imprint of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare (ESPCH). A detailed overview of the volume has been provided by Loughlin, the lead co-editor of the book [2]. Loughlin’s paper [2] is a model of clarity, providing admirable insight into the content of the individual chapters, placing each of them within the context of the ongoing debate. As Loughlin [2] rightly notes, “the ideas and terminology of person-centred care ... have been part of health discourse for a very long time ... (and) ... arguments that in healthcare one treats the whole person, not her/his component parts, date back at least to antiquity” (italicisation mine). He emphasises that “... it is only in recent years that we have seen a growing consensus in health policy and practice literature that PCC, and associated ideas including patient expertise, co-production and shared decision-making, are not simply fine ideals or ethical add-ons to sound scientific clinical practice, but rather they represent indispensable components of any genuinely integrated, realistic and conceptually sound account of healthcare practice” (italicisations mine). These observations, indeed truisms, explain the rationale which underpinned the creation of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare, and which continue to direct its mission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信