患者对医疗服务提供者的满意度:患者调查是否提供了足够的信息来帮助医疗服务提供者改善具体行为

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
F. North, S. Tulledge-Scheitel
{"title":"患者对医疗服务提供者的满意度:患者调查是否提供了足够的信息来帮助医疗服务提供者改善具体行为","authors":"F. North, S. Tulledge-Scheitel","doi":"10.1177/2333392819885284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient satisfaction surveys ask patients specific questions about provider behavior such as whether they were satisfied with the provider’s instructions about medications or time spent with the patient. It’s unclear how responses to these surveys can help providers focus on specific behaviors to improve. Methods: In a primary care setting, we analyzed Press Ganey patient experience survey responses. We examined the 10 questions dealing with satisfaction specific to the care provider experience. We used the “Top Box” counts (counts of most favorable responses) and Top Box% (percentage of most favorable response) for categorical and continuous measures of patient satisfaction. Results: For 12 consecutive months, 652 providers of 1014 accumulated at least 300 total responses from patients for the 10 provider-related questions. Only 8 of the 652 providers had significant differences (P < .05) in Top Box% for the 10 questions. Correlation of responses between the questions were between 0.86 and 0.96. Analysis of variance showed that 87% of the total variation in the Top Box% of the 10 questions was between providers and only 13% within providers. Factor analysis found no independent factors within the 10 questions (ie, a one factor model was sufficient; P < .0001). Conclusion: Patient survey questions appear to ask about specific provider behaviors that contribute to patient experience. However, the responses to 10 different questions are highly correlated and may not give providers or management enough statistically significant information to focus patient experience improvement efforts for individual providers.","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction With Providers: Do Patient Surveys Give Enough Information to Help Providers Improve Specific Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"F. North, S. Tulledge-Scheitel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2333392819885284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patient satisfaction surveys ask patients specific questions about provider behavior such as whether they were satisfied with the provider’s instructions about medications or time spent with the patient. It’s unclear how responses to these surveys can help providers focus on specific behaviors to improve. Methods: In a primary care setting, we analyzed Press Ganey patient experience survey responses. We examined the 10 questions dealing with satisfaction specific to the care provider experience. We used the “Top Box” counts (counts of most favorable responses) and Top Box% (percentage of most favorable response) for categorical and continuous measures of patient satisfaction. Results: For 12 consecutive months, 652 providers of 1014 accumulated at least 300 total responses from patients for the 10 provider-related questions. Only 8 of the 652 providers had significant differences (P < .05) in Top Box% for the 10 questions. Correlation of responses between the questions were between 0.86 and 0.96. Analysis of variance showed that 87% of the total variation in the Top Box% of the 10 questions was between providers and only 13% within providers. Factor analysis found no independent factors within the 10 questions (ie, a one factor model was sufficient; P < .0001). Conclusion: Patient survey questions appear to ask about specific provider behaviors that contribute to patient experience. However, the responses to 10 different questions are highly correlated and may not give providers or management enough statistically significant information to focus patient experience improvement efforts for individual providers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392819885284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392819885284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:患者满意度调查询问患者关于提供者行为的具体问题,例如他们是否满意提供者关于药物的指示或与患者共度的时间。目前还不清楚对这些调查的回应如何能帮助供应商专注于改善具体的行为。方法:在初级保健设置中,我们分析了Press Ganey患者体验调查的反馈。我们检查了10个问题处理满意度具体到护理提供者的经验。我们使用“Top Box”计数(最有利反应的计数)和Top Box%(最有利反应的百分比)来分类和连续测量患者满意度。结果:在连续12个月的时间里,1014名医生中有652名医生就10个与医生相关的问题从患者那里获得了至少300份回复。652家供应商中只有8家在10个问题的Top Box%上有显著差异(P < 0.05)。问题间的相关系数在0.86 ~ 0.96之间。方差分析显示,Top Box的10个问题中,有87%的总变异发生在供应商之间,而供应商内部只有13%。因子分析发现,10个问题中没有独立因素(即单因素模型是足够的;P < 0.0001)。结论:患者调查问题似乎询问了具体的提供者行为,有助于患者的经验。然而,对10个不同问题的回答是高度相关的,可能不会给提供者或管理提供足够的统计上有意义的信息,以关注个别提供者的患者体验改善工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Satisfaction With Providers: Do Patient Surveys Give Enough Information to Help Providers Improve Specific Behaviors
Background: Patient satisfaction surveys ask patients specific questions about provider behavior such as whether they were satisfied with the provider’s instructions about medications or time spent with the patient. It’s unclear how responses to these surveys can help providers focus on specific behaviors to improve. Methods: In a primary care setting, we analyzed Press Ganey patient experience survey responses. We examined the 10 questions dealing with satisfaction specific to the care provider experience. We used the “Top Box” counts (counts of most favorable responses) and Top Box% (percentage of most favorable response) for categorical and continuous measures of patient satisfaction. Results: For 12 consecutive months, 652 providers of 1014 accumulated at least 300 total responses from patients for the 10 provider-related questions. Only 8 of the 652 providers had significant differences (P < .05) in Top Box% for the 10 questions. Correlation of responses between the questions were between 0.86 and 0.96. Analysis of variance showed that 87% of the total variation in the Top Box% of the 10 questions was between providers and only 13% within providers. Factor analysis found no independent factors within the 10 questions (ie, a one factor model was sufficient; P < .0001). Conclusion: Patient survey questions appear to ask about specific provider behaviors that contribute to patient experience. However, the responses to 10 different questions are highly correlated and may not give providers or management enough statistically significant information to focus patient experience improvement efforts for individual providers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信