U. Osma, E. Kurtoğlu, H. Eyigor, M. Yılmaz, N. Aygener
{"title":"铁螯合治疗β-地中海贫血患者的感音神经性听力损失","authors":"U. Osma, E. Kurtoğlu, H. Eyigor, M. Yılmaz, N. Aygener","doi":"10.1177/014556131509401206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The predictive value of pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the early detection of ototoxicity has been questioned, particularly in the higher frequencies. Otoacoustic emissions testing appears to be more sensitive to cochlear insult than conventional PTA. We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to compare the efficacy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) testing with that of PTA as a method of audiologic monitoring. Our study group was made up of 159 patients (318 ears)—69 males (43.4%) and 90 females (56.6%), aged 5 to 61 years (mean: 23.59 ± 12.55). All patients had been diagnosed with either β-thalassemia major (BTM) or β-thalassemia intermedia (BTI), and all had received at least 1 year of treatment within the previous year with an iron chelator—either deferasirox, desferrioxamine (deferoxamine in the United States), deferiprone, or a combination of desferrioxamine and deferiprone. PTA and DPOAE evaluations were performed by the same audiologist using the same audiometer for all patients. In the right ears, the overall incidence of ototoxicity as manifested by sensorineural hearing loss was 39.0% on PTA and 22.0% on DPOAE testing; in the left ears, the corresponding figures were 27.7 and 19.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of ototoxicity between the BTM and BTI groups with any of the four different drug regimens on PTA (p = 0.765, p = 0.378, p = 0.265, and p = 0.579, respectively) or on DPOAE testing (p = 0.890, p = 0.263, p = 0.390, and p = 0.340, respectively). Based on these data, we found no significant difference between PTA and DPOAE testing in their ability to detect ototoxicity. We conclude that periodic testing with both PTA and DPOAE is necessary for patients with suspected β-thalassemia in order arrive at a prompt diagnosis and initiate timely management.","PeriodicalId":11842,"journal":{"name":"ENT Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"481 - 485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensorineural Hearing Loss in β-thalassemia Patients Treated with iron Chelation\",\"authors\":\"U. Osma, E. Kurtoğlu, H. Eyigor, M. Yılmaz, N. Aygener\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/014556131509401206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The predictive value of pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the early detection of ototoxicity has been questioned, particularly in the higher frequencies. Otoacoustic emissions testing appears to be more sensitive to cochlear insult than conventional PTA. We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to compare the efficacy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) testing with that of PTA as a method of audiologic monitoring. Our study group was made up of 159 patients (318 ears)—69 males (43.4%) and 90 females (56.6%), aged 5 to 61 years (mean: 23.59 ± 12.55). All patients had been diagnosed with either β-thalassemia major (BTM) or β-thalassemia intermedia (BTI), and all had received at least 1 year of treatment within the previous year with an iron chelator—either deferasirox, desferrioxamine (deferoxamine in the United States), deferiprone, or a combination of desferrioxamine and deferiprone. PTA and DPOAE evaluations were performed by the same audiologist using the same audiometer for all patients. In the right ears, the overall incidence of ototoxicity as manifested by sensorineural hearing loss was 39.0% on PTA and 22.0% on DPOAE testing; in the left ears, the corresponding figures were 27.7 and 19.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of ototoxicity between the BTM and BTI groups with any of the four different drug regimens on PTA (p = 0.765, p = 0.378, p = 0.265, and p = 0.579, respectively) or on DPOAE testing (p = 0.890, p = 0.263, p = 0.390, and p = 0.340, respectively). Based on these data, we found no significant difference between PTA and DPOAE testing in their ability to detect ototoxicity. We conclude that periodic testing with both PTA and DPOAE is necessary for patients with suspected β-thalassemia in order arrive at a prompt diagnosis and initiate timely management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENT Journal\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"481 - 485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENT Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131509401206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENT Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131509401206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
纯音听力学(PTA)在耳毒性早期检测中的预测价值一直受到质疑,特别是在较高的频率。耳声发射测试似乎比传统的PTA对耳蜗损伤更敏感。我们进行了一项横断面描述性研究,以比较扭曲产物耳声发射(DPOAE)测试与PTA测试作为听力学监测方法的有效性。本研究组共有159例患者(318耳),其中男性69例(43.4%),女性90例(56.6%),年龄5 ~ 61岁(平均23.59±12.55)。所有患者均被诊断为重度β-地中海贫血(BTM)或中度β-地中海贫血(BTI),并且所有患者在前一年接受了至少1年的铁螯合剂治疗-去铁氧胺、去铁氧胺(美国为去铁氧胺)、去铁氧胺或去铁氧胺和去铁氧胺的联合治疗。所有患者的PTA和DPOAE评估由同一听力学家使用同一听力学计进行。在右耳,以感觉神经性听力损失为表现的耳毒性总体发生率PTA为39.0%,DPOAE为22.0%;在左耳,相应的数字分别为27.7%和19.5%。在四种不同药物方案中,BTM组和BTI组在PTA (p = 0.765, p = 0.378, p = 0.265, p = 0.579)和DPOAE (p = 0.890, p = 0.263, p = 0.390, p = 0.340)上的耳毒性发生率无统计学差异。基于这些数据,我们发现PTA和DPOAE检测在耳毒性检测能力上没有显著差异。我们得出结论,对于疑似β-地中海贫血的患者,定期检测PTA和DPOAE是必要的,以便及时诊断和及时治疗。
Sensorineural Hearing Loss in β-thalassemia Patients Treated with iron Chelation
The predictive value of pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in the early detection of ototoxicity has been questioned, particularly in the higher frequencies. Otoacoustic emissions testing appears to be more sensitive to cochlear insult than conventional PTA. We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to compare the efficacy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) testing with that of PTA as a method of audiologic monitoring. Our study group was made up of 159 patients (318 ears)—69 males (43.4%) and 90 females (56.6%), aged 5 to 61 years (mean: 23.59 ± 12.55). All patients had been diagnosed with either β-thalassemia major (BTM) or β-thalassemia intermedia (BTI), and all had received at least 1 year of treatment within the previous year with an iron chelator—either deferasirox, desferrioxamine (deferoxamine in the United States), deferiprone, or a combination of desferrioxamine and deferiprone. PTA and DPOAE evaluations were performed by the same audiologist using the same audiometer for all patients. In the right ears, the overall incidence of ototoxicity as manifested by sensorineural hearing loss was 39.0% on PTA and 22.0% on DPOAE testing; in the left ears, the corresponding figures were 27.7 and 19.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of ototoxicity between the BTM and BTI groups with any of the four different drug regimens on PTA (p = 0.765, p = 0.378, p = 0.265, and p = 0.579, respectively) or on DPOAE testing (p = 0.890, p = 0.263, p = 0.390, and p = 0.340, respectively). Based on these data, we found no significant difference between PTA and DPOAE testing in their ability to detect ototoxicity. We conclude that periodic testing with both PTA and DPOAE is necessary for patients with suspected β-thalassemia in order arrive at a prompt diagnosis and initiate timely management.