模拟战争:提高应急手册模拟训练参与度的竞赛和模拟竞赛评级的新工具

Jeffrey Huang, K. Nguyen, Chunyuan Zhang, Wei Zheng, Zuhua Rao, Jian Ma, Yanwen Wu, Jinfan Liu, Mian Wu, Hui Zhong, Zhuang Yu
{"title":"模拟战争:提高应急手册模拟训练参与度的竞赛和模拟竞赛评级的新工具","authors":"Jeffrey Huang, K. Nguyen, Chunyuan Zhang, Wei Zheng, Zuhua Rao, Jian Ma, Yanwen Wu, Jinfan Liu, Mian Wu, Hui Zhong, Zhuang Yu","doi":"10.24015/JAPM.2018.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emergency Manuals (EMs) are valuable tools to guide healthcare professionals during anesthesia-related emergencies that require prompt diagnosis and effective treatment. Its use has been shown to improve simulated and actual patient outcomes in various operating room (OR) critical scenarios. However, integration of EMs into the standard practice of OR crises has been particularly challenging. Methods: The Simulation Wars was a competition created in China to increase awareness of EMs, the use of EMs among multidisciplinary teams, and to promote health care professional participation in EM simulation training. Each participant completed a post-competi-tion questionnaire detailing their opinions about the event. A novel scoring system was created and tested for use in simulation competitions. Results: Ninety-three percent of participants agreed that this competition could enhance the participation of simulation training in multidisciplinary health professionals and that they would continue participating in their hospital simulation training. The novel scoring system exhibited high internal consistency and good reliability. There is a strong positive correlation between the judges ’ score and the participants ’ score as R = 0.862, P = 0.013. Conclusion: The Simulation Wars can increase participants ’ understanding of how and why to use EMs, and enhance participation of multidisciplinary teams. The scoring system created for the competition has shown good reliability and justifies further development and evaluation. ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":15018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation Wars: A Competition to Increase Participation in Emergency Manuals Simulation Training and a Novel Tool for Rating Simulation Competitions\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Huang, K. Nguyen, Chunyuan Zhang, Wei Zheng, Zuhua Rao, Jian Ma, Yanwen Wu, Jinfan Liu, Mian Wu, Hui Zhong, Zhuang Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.24015/JAPM.2018.0095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Emergency Manuals (EMs) are valuable tools to guide healthcare professionals during anesthesia-related emergencies that require prompt diagnosis and effective treatment. Its use has been shown to improve simulated and actual patient outcomes in various operating room (OR) critical scenarios. However, integration of EMs into the standard practice of OR crises has been particularly challenging. Methods: The Simulation Wars was a competition created in China to increase awareness of EMs, the use of EMs among multidisciplinary teams, and to promote health care professional participation in EM simulation training. Each participant completed a post-competi-tion questionnaire detailing their opinions about the event. A novel scoring system was created and tested for use in simulation competitions. Results: Ninety-three percent of participants agreed that this competition could enhance the participation of simulation training in multidisciplinary health professionals and that they would continue participating in their hospital simulation training. The novel scoring system exhibited high internal consistency and good reliability. There is a strong positive correlation between the judges ’ score and the participants ’ score as R = 0.862, P = 0.013. Conclusion: The Simulation Wars can increase participants ’ understanding of how and why to use EMs, and enhance participation of multidisciplinary teams. The scoring system created for the competition has shown good reliability and justifies further development and evaluation. ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":15018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2018.0095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2018.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊手册(EMs)是指导医疗保健专业人员在麻醉相关紧急情况下需要及时诊断和有效治疗的宝贵工具。它的使用已被证明可以改善各种手术室(OR)危急情况下的模拟和实际患者结果。然而,将新兴市场纳入手术室危机的标准实践尤其具有挑战性。方法:模拟战争是在中国创建的一项竞赛,旨在提高对EM的认识,在多学科团队中使用EM,并促进卫生保健专业人员参与EM模拟培训。每位参赛者都完成了一份赛后问卷,详细说明了他们对比赛的看法。一种新的计分系统被创造出来,并在模拟比赛中进行了测试。结果:93%的参与者认为这次比赛可以提高多学科卫生专业人员模拟培训的参与度,他们将继续参加他们的医院模拟培训。该评分系统具有较高的内部一致性和良好的信度。裁判得分与被试得分呈显著正相关,R = 0.862, P = 0.013。结论:模拟战争可以增加参与者对如何和为什么使用电子医学的理解,并提高多学科团队的参与。为比赛设计的计分系统显示出良好的可靠性,值得进一步开发和评估。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation Wars: A Competition to Increase Participation in Emergency Manuals Simulation Training and a Novel Tool for Rating Simulation Competitions
Background: Emergency Manuals (EMs) are valuable tools to guide healthcare professionals during anesthesia-related emergencies that require prompt diagnosis and effective treatment. Its use has been shown to improve simulated and actual patient outcomes in various operating room (OR) critical scenarios. However, integration of EMs into the standard practice of OR crises has been particularly challenging. Methods: The Simulation Wars was a competition created in China to increase awareness of EMs, the use of EMs among multidisciplinary teams, and to promote health care professional participation in EM simulation training. Each participant completed a post-competi-tion questionnaire detailing their opinions about the event. A novel scoring system was created and tested for use in simulation competitions. Results: Ninety-three percent of participants agreed that this competition could enhance the participation of simulation training in multidisciplinary health professionals and that they would continue participating in their hospital simulation training. The novel scoring system exhibited high internal consistency and good reliability. There is a strong positive correlation between the judges ’ score and the participants ’ score as R = 0.862, P = 0.013. Conclusion: The Simulation Wars can increase participants ’ understanding of how and why to use EMs, and enhance participation of multidisciplinary teams. The scoring system created for the competition has shown good reliability and justifies further development and evaluation. ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信