选择国家司法系统或“私人”外包解决纠纷的争论:一个执业律师的观点

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Jorg Sladič
{"title":"选择国家司法系统或“私人”外包解决纠纷的争论:一个执业律师的观点","authors":"Jorg Sladič","doi":"10.18690/lexonomica.10.1.1-20.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Terms such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are nowadays standard terms in any classroom textbook on civil procedure. Legal scholars enumerated and assessed in depth the advantages and disadvantages of any type of outsourced dispute resolution. However, a number of legal writers still fail to enumerate the exact differences in course of events and all of the trade-offs that a party will have when deciding to resolve the dispute using an outsourced dispute resolution. Clearly the costs, the celerity and the flexibility are important issues. However, the decision is not influenced solely by legal arguments. This paper will mention some typical Slovenian issues in an assessment of the choice of dispute resolution. If parties want to continue to remain in good terms after the dispute, then an outsourced dispute resolution is highly recommended. Judicial rulings are to binary; one party wins, one loses.","PeriodicalId":40392,"journal":{"name":"Lexonomica","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Argument for Choosing State's Judicial System or a \\\"Private\\\" Outsourced Resolution of Disputes: a Practising Attorney's Point of View\",\"authors\":\"Jorg Sladič\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/lexonomica.10.1.1-20.2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Terms such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are nowadays standard terms in any classroom textbook on civil procedure. Legal scholars enumerated and assessed in depth the advantages and disadvantages of any type of outsourced dispute resolution. However, a number of legal writers still fail to enumerate the exact differences in course of events and all of the trade-offs that a party will have when deciding to resolve the dispute using an outsourced dispute resolution. Clearly the costs, the celerity and the flexibility are important issues. However, the decision is not influenced solely by legal arguments. This paper will mention some typical Slovenian issues in an assessment of the choice of dispute resolution. If parties want to continue to remain in good terms after the dispute, then an outsourced dispute resolution is highly recommended. Judicial rulings are to binary; one party wins, one loses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lexonomica\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lexonomica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.10.1.1-20.2018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexonomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.10.1.1-20.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仲裁、调解、和解和替代性争议解决(ADR)等术语如今已成为任何民事诉讼课堂教科书中的标准术语。法律学者列举并深入评估了任何类型的外包纠纷解决的利弊。然而,许多法律作者仍然未能列举出事件过程中的确切差异,以及当事一方在决定使用外包争议解决方案解决争议时将面临的所有权衡。显然,成本、速度和灵活性是重要的问题。然而,这一决定并不仅仅受到法律论据的影响。本文将在对争端解决方式选择的评估中提到一些典型的斯洛文尼亚问题。如果双方希望在争议结束后继续保持良好的关系,那么强烈建议外包争议解决方案。司法裁决是二元的;一方赢,一方输。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Argument for Choosing State's Judicial System or a "Private" Outsourced Resolution of Disputes: a Practising Attorney's Point of View
Terms such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are nowadays standard terms in any classroom textbook on civil procedure. Legal scholars enumerated and assessed in depth the advantages and disadvantages of any type of outsourced dispute resolution. However, a number of legal writers still fail to enumerate the exact differences in course of events and all of the trade-offs that a party will have when deciding to resolve the dispute using an outsourced dispute resolution. Clearly the costs, the celerity and the flexibility are important issues. However, the decision is not influenced solely by legal arguments. This paper will mention some typical Slovenian issues in an assessment of the choice of dispute resolution. If parties want to continue to remain in good terms after the dispute, then an outsourced dispute resolution is highly recommended. Judicial rulings are to binary; one party wins, one loses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lexonomica
Lexonomica LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信