便携式XRF光谱仪光谱干扰的近实时管理:在含镍红土矿石中钪定量中的应用

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
E. Lacroix, J. Cauzid, Y. Teitler, M. Cathelineau
{"title":"便携式XRF光谱仪光谱干扰的近实时管理:在含镍红土矿石中钪定量中的应用","authors":"E. Lacroix, J. Cauzid, Y. Teitler, M. Cathelineau","doi":"10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.5511838.V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the development of portable XRF (pXRF) spectrometers, few studies have been conducted on the influence of spectral interferences between chemical elements. This study aims to improve the management of these interferences to obtain more reliable geochemical analyses. We specifically investigate Ca-related interferences on Sc analysis for the case of Ni-rich laterite samples using the Niton XL3t GOLDD+ pXRF analyser. Three quantification methods were tested on 59 pelletised samples using the ‘Soil’ mode. The first named ‘Manufacturer’, represents the elemental quantification directly provided by the device based on Regions of Interest (ROI) and multilinear corrections of spectral interferences configured during the spectrometer design. The second, the ‘20 Cu’ method, is based on spectral fitting using the PyMCA software. The third, the ‘18 Fe’ method, combines spectral fitting with modified experimental conditions. For each, a quantification methodology was developed, establishing (i) Ca and Sc calibration lines and (ii) Ca/Sc threshold values delimiting fields of ‘reliable’, 'to be confirmed,’ and ‘unreliable’ measurements. The ‘20 Cu’ and ‘18 Fe’ methods greatly extend the ‘reliable measurements’ field concerning the Ca/Sc ratio compared to the ‘Manufacturer’ method. The ‘18 Fe’ method was also found to provide the most negligible measurement dispersion.","PeriodicalId":55114,"journal":{"name":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Near real-time management of spectral interferences with portable XRF spectrometers: Application to Sc quantification in nickeliferous laterite ores\",\"authors\":\"E. Lacroix, J. Cauzid, Y. Teitler, M. Cathelineau\",\"doi\":\"10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.5511838.V1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the development of portable XRF (pXRF) spectrometers, few studies have been conducted on the influence of spectral interferences between chemical elements. This study aims to improve the management of these interferences to obtain more reliable geochemical analyses. We specifically investigate Ca-related interferences on Sc analysis for the case of Ni-rich laterite samples using the Niton XL3t GOLDD+ pXRF analyser. Three quantification methods were tested on 59 pelletised samples using the ‘Soil’ mode. The first named ‘Manufacturer’, represents the elemental quantification directly provided by the device based on Regions of Interest (ROI) and multilinear corrections of spectral interferences configured during the spectrometer design. The second, the ‘20 Cu’ method, is based on spectral fitting using the PyMCA software. The third, the ‘18 Fe’ method, combines spectral fitting with modified experimental conditions. For each, a quantification methodology was developed, establishing (i) Ca and Sc calibration lines and (ii) Ca/Sc threshold values delimiting fields of ‘reliable’, 'to be confirmed,’ and ‘unreliable’ measurements. The ‘20 Cu’ and ‘18 Fe’ methods greatly extend the ‘reliable measurements’ field concerning the Ca/Sc ratio compared to the ‘Manufacturer’ method. The ‘18 Fe’ method was also found to provide the most negligible measurement dispersion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.5511838.V1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.5511838.V1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自便携式XRF (pXRF)光谱仪问世以来,对化学元素间光谱干扰影响的研究很少。本研究旨在改善这些干扰的管理,以获得更可靠的地球化学分析。我们使用Niton XL3t GOLDD+ pXRF分析仪对富镍红土样品的Sc分析进行了ca相关干扰研究。采用“土壤”模式对59个颗粒样品进行了三种量化方法的测试。第一个名称为“Manufacturer”,代表设备直接提供的元素定量,该定量基于感兴趣区域(ROI)和光谱仪设计期间配置的光谱干扰的多线性校正。第二种是“20 Cu”方法,是基于使用PyMCA软件的光谱拟合。第三种是“18fe”方法,将光谱拟合与修正的实验条件相结合。对于每一种,都开发了一种量化方法,建立了(i) Ca和Sc校准线和(ii) Ca/Sc阈值,划分了“可靠”、“待确认”和“不可靠”测量的领域。与“制造商”方法相比,“20 Cu”和“18 Fe”方法大大扩展了有关Ca/Sc比率的“可靠测量”领域。“18fe”方法也被发现提供最可忽略的测量色散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Near real-time management of spectral interferences with portable XRF spectrometers: Application to Sc quantification in nickeliferous laterite ores
Since the development of portable XRF (pXRF) spectrometers, few studies have been conducted on the influence of spectral interferences between chemical elements. This study aims to improve the management of these interferences to obtain more reliable geochemical analyses. We specifically investigate Ca-related interferences on Sc analysis for the case of Ni-rich laterite samples using the Niton XL3t GOLDD+ pXRF analyser. Three quantification methods were tested on 59 pelletised samples using the ‘Soil’ mode. The first named ‘Manufacturer’, represents the elemental quantification directly provided by the device based on Regions of Interest (ROI) and multilinear corrections of spectral interferences configured during the spectrometer design. The second, the ‘20 Cu’ method, is based on spectral fitting using the PyMCA software. The third, the ‘18 Fe’ method, combines spectral fitting with modified experimental conditions. For each, a quantification methodology was developed, establishing (i) Ca and Sc calibration lines and (ii) Ca/Sc threshold values delimiting fields of ‘reliable’, 'to be confirmed,’ and ‘unreliable’ measurements. The ‘20 Cu’ and ‘18 Fe’ methods greatly extend the ‘reliable measurements’ field concerning the Ca/Sc ratio compared to the ‘Manufacturer’ method. The ‘18 Fe’ method was also found to provide the most negligible measurement dispersion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis
Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (GEEA) is a co-owned journal of the Geological Society of London and the Association of Applied Geochemists (AAG). GEEA focuses on mineral exploration using geochemistry; related fields also covered include geoanalysis, the development of methods and techniques used to analyse geochemical materials such as rocks, soils, sediments, waters and vegetation, and environmental issues associated with mining and source apportionment. GEEA is well-known for its thematic sets on hot topics and regularly publishes papers from the biennial International Applied Geochemistry Symposium (IAGS). Papers that seek to integrate geological, geochemical and geophysical methods of exploration are particularly welcome, as are those that concern geochemical mapping and those that comprise case histories. Given the many links between exploration and environmental geochemistry, the journal encourages the exchange of concepts and data; in particular, to differentiate various sources of elements. GEEA publishes research articles; discussion papers; book reviews; editorial content and thematic sets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信