PCAOB审查过程:对一家大公司经验的客户层面分析

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Brant E. Christensen, Nathan J. Newton, Michael S. Wilkins
{"title":"PCAOB审查过程:对一家大公司经验的客户层面分析","authors":"Brant E. Christensen, Nathan J. Newton, Michael S. Wilkins","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-2020-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use proprietary archival data to examine one annually inspected audit firm’s experience with the PCAOB inspection process. We find that the firm’s audits are primarily selected for inspection due to client characteristics, while deficiencies identified by inspectors are related to characteristics of both the client and the audit team. We also find that not all identified audit deficiencies are reported to the public. However, we find some evidence that only publicly disclosed deficiencies are associated with ex-post measures of audit quality, suggesting that the PCAOB releases only the most relevant and material information to the public. Finally, we find that inspections affect the concurrent year’s audit team staffing decisions and reduce the proportion of the audit that is completed during the interim period. Overall, our study provides important insights into the PCAOB inspection process while also developing and validating a model of inspection risk for future researchers.","PeriodicalId":48142,"journal":{"name":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The PCAOB Inspection Process: A Client-Level Analysis of a Large Firm’s Experience\",\"authors\":\"Brant E. Christensen, Nathan J. Newton, Michael S. Wilkins\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/ajpt-2020-143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use proprietary archival data to examine one annually inspected audit firm’s experience with the PCAOB inspection process. We find that the firm’s audits are primarily selected for inspection due to client characteristics, while deficiencies identified by inspectors are related to characteristics of both the client and the audit team. We also find that not all identified audit deficiencies are reported to the public. However, we find some evidence that only publicly disclosed deficiencies are associated with ex-post measures of audit quality, suggesting that the PCAOB releases only the most relevant and material information to the public. Finally, we find that inspections affect the concurrent year’s audit team staffing decisions and reduce the proportion of the audit that is completed during the interim period. Overall, our study provides important insights into the PCAOB inspection process while also developing and validating a model of inspection risk for future researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2020-143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2020-143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们使用专有档案数据来检查一家每年接受PCAOB检查的审计事务所的经验。我们发现,事务所的审计主要是根据客户的特点而选择进行检查的,而检查员发现的缺陷与客户和审计团队的特点有关。我们还发现,并非所有已发现的审计缺陷都向公众报告了。然而,我们发现一些证据表明,只有公开披露的缺陷与事后审计质量措施有关,这表明PCAOB只向公众发布最相关和最重要的信息。最后,我们发现检查会影响同年审计组的人员配置决策,并减少在中期完成的审计比例。总的来说,我们的研究为PCAOB检查过程提供了重要的见解,同时也为未来的研究人员开发和验证了检查风险模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The PCAOB Inspection Process: A Client-Level Analysis of a Large Firm’s Experience
We use proprietary archival data to examine one annually inspected audit firm’s experience with the PCAOB inspection process. We find that the firm’s audits are primarily selected for inspection due to client characteristics, while deficiencies identified by inspectors are related to characteristics of both the client and the audit team. We also find that not all identified audit deficiencies are reported to the public. However, we find some evidence that only publicly disclosed deficiencies are associated with ex-post measures of audit quality, suggesting that the PCAOB releases only the most relevant and material information to the public. Finally, we find that inspections affect the concurrent year’s audit team staffing decisions and reduce the proportion of the audit that is completed during the interim period. Overall, our study provides important insights into the PCAOB inspection process while also developing and validating a model of inspection risk for future researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AUDITING contains technical articles as well as news and reports on current activities of the association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信