T. Jensen, Kim Allen, Sara de Benedictis, K. Garthwaite, Ruth Patrick
{"title":"过渡期的福利想象","authors":"T. Jensen, Kim Allen, Sara de Benedictis, K. Garthwaite, Ruth Patrick","doi":"10.3898/soun.72.05.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article brings together reflections from the recent seminar series, Welfare Imaginaries, and explores the ways that 'welfare' has been and can be narrated, constructed and understood. There is an urgent need to consider alternative, and more creative, imaginings of the welfare\n state, particularly at a time of intensifying neoliberalism and austerity measures, a hardening of attitudes towards welfare, and divisive rhetoric centred around deservingness. Both research and the lived experiences of austerity have shown the disproportionate impacts of welfare reforms\n on those already living with significant hardship. In creatively rethinking and reshaping welfare, the authors argue that those with direct experience of poverty, and thus most affected by welfare reform, should be a significant part of the conversation; and they also consider different ways\n of crafting welfare imaginaries that are inclusive, fair and socially just.","PeriodicalId":45378,"journal":{"name":"SOUNDINGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welfare imaginaries at the interregnum\",\"authors\":\"T. Jensen, Kim Allen, Sara de Benedictis, K. Garthwaite, Ruth Patrick\",\"doi\":\"10.3898/soun.72.05.2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article brings together reflections from the recent seminar series, Welfare Imaginaries, and explores the ways that 'welfare' has been and can be narrated, constructed and understood. There is an urgent need to consider alternative, and more creative, imaginings of the welfare\\n state, particularly at a time of intensifying neoliberalism and austerity measures, a hardening of attitudes towards welfare, and divisive rhetoric centred around deservingness. Both research and the lived experiences of austerity have shown the disproportionate impacts of welfare reforms\\n on those already living with significant hardship. In creatively rethinking and reshaping welfare, the authors argue that those with direct experience of poverty, and thus most affected by welfare reform, should be a significant part of the conversation; and they also consider different ways\\n of crafting welfare imaginaries that are inclusive, fair and socially just.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOUNDINGS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOUNDINGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.72.05.2019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUNDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.72.05.2019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article brings together reflections from the recent seminar series, Welfare Imaginaries, and explores the ways that 'welfare' has been and can be narrated, constructed and understood. There is an urgent need to consider alternative, and more creative, imaginings of the welfare
state, particularly at a time of intensifying neoliberalism and austerity measures, a hardening of attitudes towards welfare, and divisive rhetoric centred around deservingness. Both research and the lived experiences of austerity have shown the disproportionate impacts of welfare reforms
on those already living with significant hardship. In creatively rethinking and reshaping welfare, the authors argue that those with direct experience of poverty, and thus most affected by welfare reform, should be a significant part of the conversation; and they also consider different ways
of crafting welfare imaginaries that are inclusive, fair and socially just.