生成式人工智能的阴暗面:对ChatGPT争议和风险的批判性分析

IF 2.6 Q1 ECONOMICS
K. Wach, Cong Doanh Duong, J. Ejdys, Rūta Kazlauskaitė, P. Korzyński, G. Mazurek, Joanna Paliszkiewicz, E. Ziemba
{"title":"生成式人工智能的阴暗面:对ChatGPT争议和风险的批判性分析","authors":"K. Wach, Cong Doanh Duong, J. Ejdys, Rūta Kazlauskaitė, P. Korzyński, G. Mazurek, Joanna Paliszkiewicz, E. Ziemba","doi":"10.15678/eber.2023.110201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the article is to provide a comprehensive identification and understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in business. This study sought to develop a conceptual framework that gathers the negative aspects of GAI development in management and economics, with a focus on ChatGPT. Research Design & Methods: The study employed a narrative and critical literature review and developed a conceptual framework based on prior literature. We used a line of deductive reasoning in formulating our theoretical framework to make the study’s overall structure rational and productive. Therefore, this article should be viewed as a conceptual article that highlights the controversies and threats of GAI in management and economics, with ChatGPT as a case study. Findings: Based on the conducted deep and extensive query of academic literature on the subject as well as professional press and Internet portals, we identified various controversies, threats, defects, and disadvantages of GAI, in particular ChatGPT. Next, we grouped the identified threats into clusters to summarize the seven main threats we see. In our opinion they are as follows: (i) no regulation of the AI market and urgent need for regulation, (ii) poor quality, lack of quality control, disinformation, deepfake content, algorithmic bias, (iii) automation-spurred job losses, (iv) personal data violation, social surveillance, and privacy violation, (v) social manipulation, weakening ethics and goodwill, (vi) widening socio-economic inequalities, and (vii) AI technostress. Implications & Recommendations: It is important to regulate the AI/GAI market. Advocating for the regulation of the AI market is crucial to ensure a level playing field, promote fair competition, protect intellectual property rights and privacy, and prevent potential geopolitical risks. The changing job market requires workers to continuously acquire new (digital) skills through education and retraining. As the training of AI systems becomes a prominent job category, it is important to adapt and take advantage of new opportunities. To mitigate the risks related to personal data violation, social surveillance, and privacy violation, GAI developers must prioritize ethical considerations and work to develop systems that prioritize user privacy and security. To avoid social manipulation and weaken ethics and goodwill, it is important to implement responsible AI practices and ethical guidelines: transparency in data usage, bias mitigation techniques, and monitoring of generated content for harmful or misleading information. Contribution & Value Added: This article may aid in bringing attention to the significance of resolving the ethical and legal considerations that arise from the use of GAI and ChatGPT by drawing attention to the contro-versies and hazards associated with these technologies.","PeriodicalId":11726,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"K. Wach, Cong Doanh Duong, J. Ejdys, Rūta Kazlauskaitė, P. Korzyński, G. Mazurek, Joanna Paliszkiewicz, E. Ziemba\",\"doi\":\"10.15678/eber.2023.110201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of the article is to provide a comprehensive identification and understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in business. This study sought to develop a conceptual framework that gathers the negative aspects of GAI development in management and economics, with a focus on ChatGPT. Research Design & Methods: The study employed a narrative and critical literature review and developed a conceptual framework based on prior literature. We used a line of deductive reasoning in formulating our theoretical framework to make the study’s overall structure rational and productive. Therefore, this article should be viewed as a conceptual article that highlights the controversies and threats of GAI in management and economics, with ChatGPT as a case study. Findings: Based on the conducted deep and extensive query of academic literature on the subject as well as professional press and Internet portals, we identified various controversies, threats, defects, and disadvantages of GAI, in particular ChatGPT. Next, we grouped the identified threats into clusters to summarize the seven main threats we see. In our opinion they are as follows: (i) no regulation of the AI market and urgent need for regulation, (ii) poor quality, lack of quality control, disinformation, deepfake content, algorithmic bias, (iii) automation-spurred job losses, (iv) personal data violation, social surveillance, and privacy violation, (v) social manipulation, weakening ethics and goodwill, (vi) widening socio-economic inequalities, and (vii) AI technostress. Implications & Recommendations: It is important to regulate the AI/GAI market. Advocating for the regulation of the AI market is crucial to ensure a level playing field, promote fair competition, protect intellectual property rights and privacy, and prevent potential geopolitical risks. The changing job market requires workers to continuously acquire new (digital) skills through education and retraining. As the training of AI systems becomes a prominent job category, it is important to adapt and take advantage of new opportunities. To mitigate the risks related to personal data violation, social surveillance, and privacy violation, GAI developers must prioritize ethical considerations and work to develop systems that prioritize user privacy and security. To avoid social manipulation and weaken ethics and goodwill, it is important to implement responsible AI practices and ethical guidelines: transparency in data usage, bias mitigation techniques, and monitoring of generated content for harmful or misleading information. Contribution & Value Added: This article may aid in bringing attention to the significance of resolving the ethical and legal considerations that arise from the use of GAI and ChatGPT by drawing attention to the contro-versies and hazards associated with these technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2023.110201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2023.110201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

目的:本文的目的是提供与在商业中使用生成式人工智能(GAI)相关的挑战和机遇的全面识别和理解。本研究试图建立一个概念框架,收集管理和经济学中GAI发展的消极方面,重点是ChatGPT。研究设计与方法:本研究采用叙述性和批判性的文献回顾,并在先前文献的基础上建立一个概念框架。我们采用了一系列的演绎推理来制定我们的理论框架,使研究的整体结构合理而富有成效。因此,本文应被视为一篇概念性的文章,强调了GAI在管理和经济学中的争议和威胁,并以ChatGPT作为案例研究。研究发现:通过对该主题的学术文献以及专业媒体和互联网门户网站进行深入而广泛的查询,我们发现了GAI,特别是ChatGPT的各种争议、威胁、缺陷和劣势。接下来,我们将已识别的威胁分组,以总结我们看到的七个主要威胁。在我们看来,它们如下:(i)对人工智能市场没有监管,迫切需要监管,(ii)质量差,缺乏质量控制,虚假信息,深度虚假内容,算法偏见,(iii)自动化导致的失业,(iv)个人数据侵犯,社会监视和隐私侵犯,(v)社会操纵,削弱道德和善意,(vi)扩大社会经济不平等,以及(vii)人工智能技术压力。启示与建议:规范AI/GAI市场非常重要。倡导对人工智能市场进行监管,对于确保公平竞争、促进公平竞争、保护知识产权和隐私、防范潜在地缘政治风险至关重要。不断变化的就业市场要求工人通过教育和再培训不断获得新的(数字)技能。随着人工智能系统的培训成为一个突出的工作类别,适应和利用新的机会是很重要的。为了减轻与个人数据侵犯、社会监视和隐私侵犯相关的风险,GAI开发人员必须优先考虑道德因素,并努力开发优先考虑用户隐私和安全的系统。为了避免社会操纵并削弱道德和商誉,必须实施负责任的人工智能实践和道德准则:数据使用的透明度、减轻偏见的技术,以及对生成的内容进行有害或误导性信息的监测。贡献和增值:本文可以通过关注与GAI和ChatGPT相关的争议和危害,帮助人们注意到解决使用GAI和ChatGPT所产生的伦理和法律问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT
Objective: The objective of the article is to provide a comprehensive identification and understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in business. This study sought to develop a conceptual framework that gathers the negative aspects of GAI development in management and economics, with a focus on ChatGPT. Research Design & Methods: The study employed a narrative and critical literature review and developed a conceptual framework based on prior literature. We used a line of deductive reasoning in formulating our theoretical framework to make the study’s overall structure rational and productive. Therefore, this article should be viewed as a conceptual article that highlights the controversies and threats of GAI in management and economics, with ChatGPT as a case study. Findings: Based on the conducted deep and extensive query of academic literature on the subject as well as professional press and Internet portals, we identified various controversies, threats, defects, and disadvantages of GAI, in particular ChatGPT. Next, we grouped the identified threats into clusters to summarize the seven main threats we see. In our opinion they are as follows: (i) no regulation of the AI market and urgent need for regulation, (ii) poor quality, lack of quality control, disinformation, deepfake content, algorithmic bias, (iii) automation-spurred job losses, (iv) personal data violation, social surveillance, and privacy violation, (v) social manipulation, weakening ethics and goodwill, (vi) widening socio-economic inequalities, and (vii) AI technostress. Implications & Recommendations: It is important to regulate the AI/GAI market. Advocating for the regulation of the AI market is crucial to ensure a level playing field, promote fair competition, protect intellectual property rights and privacy, and prevent potential geopolitical risks. The changing job market requires workers to continuously acquire new (digital) skills through education and retraining. As the training of AI systems becomes a prominent job category, it is important to adapt and take advantage of new opportunities. To mitigate the risks related to personal data violation, social surveillance, and privacy violation, GAI developers must prioritize ethical considerations and work to develop systems that prioritize user privacy and security. To avoid social manipulation and weaken ethics and goodwill, it is important to implement responsible AI practices and ethical guidelines: transparency in data usage, bias mitigation techniques, and monitoring of generated content for harmful or misleading information. Contribution & Value Added: This article may aid in bringing attention to the significance of resolving the ethical and legal considerations that arise from the use of GAI and ChatGPT by drawing attention to the contro-versies and hazards associated with these technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.90%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review (EBER), as multi-disciplinary and multi-contextual journal, is dedicated to serve as a broad and unified platform for revealing and spreading economics and management research focused on entrepreneurship, individual entrepreneurs as well as particular entrepreneurial aspects of business. It attempts to link theory and practice in different sections of economics and management by publishing various types of articles, including research papers, conceptual papers and literature reviews. Our geographical scope of interests include Central and Eastern Europe and emerging markets, however we also welcome articles beyond this scope. The Journal accept the articles from the following fields: -Entrepreneurship and Business Studies (in particular entrepreneurship and innovation, strategic entrepreneurship, corporate entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship methodology, new trends in HRM and HRD as well as organizational behaviour, entrepreneurial management, entrepreneurial business, management methodology, modern trends in business studies and organization theory, policies promoting entrepreneurship, innovation, R&D and SMEs, education for entrepreneurship), -International Business and Global Entrepreneurship (especially international entrepreneurship, European business, and new trends in international business, IB methodology), -International Economics and Applied Economics (in particular the role of entrepreneurship and the entrepreneur in economics, international economics including the economics of the European Union and emerging markets, as well as Europeanization, new trends in economics, economics methodology).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信