争议再现。为宗教概念辩护

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
J. Turner
{"title":"争议再现。为宗教概念辩护","authors":"J. Turner","doi":"10.5771/0257-9774-2022-2-323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthropologists have claimed that no society known historically, and no contemporary society for which we have ethnographic information, has lacked a system of religious beliefs. But not all scholars have agreed with this claim of universality, and in Religious Studies the rejection of universality was associated with research on the history of the concept, “religion.” In this article I examine critiques of the idea of universality and identify problematic issues they encounter. I will then look at different definitional strategies that have been adopted towards religion, with brief examples of each. This will be followed by a discussion of the concept of empiricism in relation to the definition of religion. This will lead to a discussion of the “ontological turn” in anthropology and the corporeal nature of human beings that underlies our shared sensory experience. Finally, I will offer a definition of religion that supports the claim of universality.","PeriodicalId":8336,"journal":{"name":"Anthropos","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies Revisited. A Defense of the Concept of Religion\",\"authors\":\"J. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/0257-9774-2022-2-323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anthropologists have claimed that no society known historically, and no contemporary society for which we have ethnographic information, has lacked a system of religious beliefs. But not all scholars have agreed with this claim of universality, and in Religious Studies the rejection of universality was associated with research on the history of the concept, “religion.” In this article I examine critiques of the idea of universality and identify problematic issues they encounter. I will then look at different definitional strategies that have been adopted towards religion, with brief examples of each. This will be followed by a discussion of the concept of empiricism in relation to the definition of religion. This will lead to a discussion of the “ontological turn” in anthropology and the corporeal nature of human beings that underlies our shared sensory experience. Finally, I will offer a definition of religion that supports the claim of universality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropos\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/0257-9774-2022-2-323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0257-9774-2022-2-323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类学家声称,历史上已知的社会,以及我们有人种学信息的当代社会,都没有缺乏宗教信仰体系。但并不是所有的学者都同意这种普遍性的主张,在宗教研究中,对普遍性的拒绝与对“宗教”概念历史的研究有关。在本文中,我考察了对普遍性概念的批评,并确定了他们遇到的问题。然后,我将看看对宗教所采用的不同定义策略,并给出每种策略的简短例子。接下来将讨论与宗教定义有关的经验主义概念。这将导致对人类学的“本体论转向”和人类的肉体本质的讨论,这是我们共同感官经验的基础。最后,我将给出一个支持普遍性主张的宗教定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversies Revisited. A Defense of the Concept of Religion
Anthropologists have claimed that no society known historically, and no contemporary society for which we have ethnographic information, has lacked a system of religious beliefs. But not all scholars have agreed with this claim of universality, and in Religious Studies the rejection of universality was associated with research on the history of the concept, “religion.” In this article I examine critiques of the idea of universality and identify problematic issues they encounter. I will then look at different definitional strategies that have been adopted towards religion, with brief examples of each. This will be followed by a discussion of the concept of empiricism in relation to the definition of religion. This will lead to a discussion of the “ontological turn” in anthropology and the corporeal nature of human beings that underlies our shared sensory experience. Finally, I will offer a definition of religion that supports the claim of universality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropos
Anthropos ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Institute concerns itself with the study of the human sciences in the area of Ethnology and related sciences (Linguistics, Religious Studies). The Institute has been closely linked with the Society of Divine Word and also shares its mission interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信