同种异体羊膜冷冻移植处理不同阶段微生物质量评价

Arifuzzaman, Naznin Akhtar, S. M. Asaduzzaman
{"title":"同种异体羊膜冷冻移植处理不同阶段微生物质量评价","authors":"Arifuzzaman, Naznin Akhtar, S. M. Asaduzzaman","doi":"10.4172/2168-9296.1000197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human Amniotic Membrane (HAM) is widely used as biological dressing material in reconstructive skin surgery, abdominal and vaginal reconstruction, plastic and cosmetic surgery and in ophthalmologic surgery. The objective of this study was to assess microbial quality of HAM during different stages of frozen HAM allograft processing and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated microorganisms. For this purpose, twelve amniotic sacs were collected from normal vaginal delivery of seronegative mother from Azimpur maternity, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Initial bioburden was determined by using Nutrient Agar (NA), McConkey Agar, EMB Agar, Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). Total Viable Bacterial Count (TVBC) was calculated and Initial bacterial load was ranged from 39 to 5.25×103. No fungus was found. A total 28 bacterial isolates were selected. These bacterial isolates were identified on the basis of cultural (e.g. colony size, shape, opacity), morphological (e.g. gram reaction, cell shape and arrangement) and biochemical characterization (e.g. catalase, oxidase, carbohydrate fermentation, MR test and VP test). Of them, eight bacterial isolates were identified as Staphylococcus aureus, two were Staphylococcus epidermidis, nine were Escherichia coli, three were Salmonella typhimurium, one was Enterobacter aerogenes, one was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, four were Acinetobacter baumanii. Then, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolated microorganisms were determined against ten antibiotics which includes Amphicillin, Streptomycin, Gentamycin, Neomycin, Imipenem, Vancomycin, Cloxacillin, Polymixin-B, Penicillin-G and Ciprofoxacin. It was found that, all bacterial isolates were sensitive to streptomycin and Penicillin-G. Thus, Streptomycin-Penicillin-G (Strep-P) cocktail was formulated and was used for the preparation of frozen AM. Then, bioburden was again determined by spread plate technique using the same media. Bacterial load in the processed HAM were ranged from 33 to 3.94 2. After then, HAM was preserved by using Dulbeco’s Modified Eagles Media (DMEM) and glycerol (1:1 ratio) and was stored at -80°C. Microbial quality of the preserved samples were checked at 07, 14, 21 & 30 days and no bioburden was found. Thus, it can be said that the antibiotic cocktail was suitable to remove the culturable microorganisms associated with HAM.","PeriodicalId":9775,"journal":{"name":"Cell & developmental biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological Quality Assessment at Different Stages of Frozen Amniotic Allograft Processing for Safe Tissue Banking Activities\",\"authors\":\"Arifuzzaman, Naznin Akhtar, S. M. Asaduzzaman\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2168-9296.1000197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human Amniotic Membrane (HAM) is widely used as biological dressing material in reconstructive skin surgery, abdominal and vaginal reconstruction, plastic and cosmetic surgery and in ophthalmologic surgery. The objective of this study was to assess microbial quality of HAM during different stages of frozen HAM allograft processing and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated microorganisms. For this purpose, twelve amniotic sacs were collected from normal vaginal delivery of seronegative mother from Azimpur maternity, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Initial bioburden was determined by using Nutrient Agar (NA), McConkey Agar, EMB Agar, Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). Total Viable Bacterial Count (TVBC) was calculated and Initial bacterial load was ranged from 39 to 5.25×103. No fungus was found. A total 28 bacterial isolates were selected. These bacterial isolates were identified on the basis of cultural (e.g. colony size, shape, opacity), morphological (e.g. gram reaction, cell shape and arrangement) and biochemical characterization (e.g. catalase, oxidase, carbohydrate fermentation, MR test and VP test). Of them, eight bacterial isolates were identified as Staphylococcus aureus, two were Staphylococcus epidermidis, nine were Escherichia coli, three were Salmonella typhimurium, one was Enterobacter aerogenes, one was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, four were Acinetobacter baumanii. Then, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolated microorganisms were determined against ten antibiotics which includes Amphicillin, Streptomycin, Gentamycin, Neomycin, Imipenem, Vancomycin, Cloxacillin, Polymixin-B, Penicillin-G and Ciprofoxacin. It was found that, all bacterial isolates were sensitive to streptomycin and Penicillin-G. Thus, Streptomycin-Penicillin-G (Strep-P) cocktail was formulated and was used for the preparation of frozen AM. Then, bioburden was again determined by spread plate technique using the same media. Bacterial load in the processed HAM were ranged from 33 to 3.94 2. After then, HAM was preserved by using Dulbeco’s Modified Eagles Media (DMEM) and glycerol (1:1 ratio) and was stored at -80°C. Microbial quality of the preserved samples were checked at 07, 14, 21 & 30 days and no bioburden was found. Thus, it can be said that the antibiotic cocktail was suitable to remove the culturable microorganisms associated with HAM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell & developmental biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell & developmental biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9296.1000197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell & developmental biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9296.1000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人羊膜(HAM)作为生物敷料广泛应用于皮肤再造术、腹部和阴道再造术、整形美容手术和眼科手术。本研究的目的是评估火腿在冷冻异体火腿加工的不同阶段的微生物质量,并测定分离的微生物的抗菌敏感性。为此,从孟加拉国达卡Azimpur产妇血清阴性的正常阴道分娩中收集了12个羊膜囊。采用营养琼脂(NA)、McConkey琼脂、EMB琼脂、马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(PDA)测定初始生物负荷。计算总活菌数(TVBC),初始细菌负荷范围为39 ~ 5.25×103。没有发现真菌。共分离出28株细菌。根据培养(如菌落大小、形状、不透明度)、形态学(如革兰氏反应、细胞形状和排列)和生化表征(如过氧化氢酶、氧化酶、碳水化合物发酵、MR试验和VP试验)对这些分离的细菌进行鉴定。其中,金黄色葡萄球菌8株,表皮葡萄球菌2株,大肠杆菌9株,鼠伤寒沙门菌3株,产气肠杆菌1株,铜绿假单胞菌1株,鲍曼不动杆菌4株。然后,测定分离微生物对氨苄青霉素、链霉素、庆大霉素、新霉素、亚胺培南、万古霉素、氯西林、Polymixin-B、青霉素- g、环丙沙星等10种抗生素的药敏模式。结果发现,所有分离菌株均对链霉素和青霉素- g敏感。因此,我们配制了链霉素-青霉素- g (Streptomycin-Penicillin-G, Strep-P)鸡尾酒,并将其用于制备冷冻AM。然后,使用相同的培养基,用铺板技术再次测定生物负荷。处理后的火腿细菌负荷范围为33 ~ 3.94 2。然后用Dulbeco 's Modified Eagles培养基(DMEM)和甘油(1:1比例)保存,-80°C保存。保存样品于第7、14、21和30天进行微生物质量检查,未发现生物负担。因此,可以认为鸡尾酒抗生素适合去除与HAM相关的可培养微生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbiological Quality Assessment at Different Stages of Frozen Amniotic Allograft Processing for Safe Tissue Banking Activities
Human Amniotic Membrane (HAM) is widely used as biological dressing material in reconstructive skin surgery, abdominal and vaginal reconstruction, plastic and cosmetic surgery and in ophthalmologic surgery. The objective of this study was to assess microbial quality of HAM during different stages of frozen HAM allograft processing and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated microorganisms. For this purpose, twelve amniotic sacs were collected from normal vaginal delivery of seronegative mother from Azimpur maternity, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Initial bioburden was determined by using Nutrient Agar (NA), McConkey Agar, EMB Agar, Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). Total Viable Bacterial Count (TVBC) was calculated and Initial bacterial load was ranged from 39 to 5.25×103. No fungus was found. A total 28 bacterial isolates were selected. These bacterial isolates were identified on the basis of cultural (e.g. colony size, shape, opacity), morphological (e.g. gram reaction, cell shape and arrangement) and biochemical characterization (e.g. catalase, oxidase, carbohydrate fermentation, MR test and VP test). Of them, eight bacterial isolates were identified as Staphylococcus aureus, two were Staphylococcus epidermidis, nine were Escherichia coli, three were Salmonella typhimurium, one was Enterobacter aerogenes, one was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, four were Acinetobacter baumanii. Then, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolated microorganisms were determined against ten antibiotics which includes Amphicillin, Streptomycin, Gentamycin, Neomycin, Imipenem, Vancomycin, Cloxacillin, Polymixin-B, Penicillin-G and Ciprofoxacin. It was found that, all bacterial isolates were sensitive to streptomycin and Penicillin-G. Thus, Streptomycin-Penicillin-G (Strep-P) cocktail was formulated and was used for the preparation of frozen AM. Then, bioburden was again determined by spread plate technique using the same media. Bacterial load in the processed HAM were ranged from 33 to 3.94 2. After then, HAM was preserved by using Dulbeco’s Modified Eagles Media (DMEM) and glycerol (1:1 ratio) and was stored at -80°C. Microbial quality of the preserved samples were checked at 07, 14, 21 & 30 days and no bioburden was found. Thus, it can be said that the antibiotic cocktail was suitable to remove the culturable microorganisms associated with HAM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信