工人集体在工作场所作为一个独立的组织机制

Kari Lilja
{"title":"工人集体在工作场所作为一个独立的组织机制","authors":"Kari Lilja","doi":"10.1016/0281-7527(87)90005-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A distinctive feature of some manufacturing workplaces has been that the negotiated order of day-to-day operations is dependent on the consent of a workplace-level collectivity of workers. Despite Lysgaard's (1961) stimulating contribution very little empirical research exists on this topic. This article discusses potential criteria which could be used in the identification of workers' workplace organisations. Instead of overt institutional mechanisms the <em>differentia specifica</em> of a workers' workplace organisation is linked </p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>(1) to the existence of leadership over and above lower-level collectivities,</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>(2) to the existence of a factory consciousness which distinguishes workers' workplace organisations from other local collectivities and</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>(3) to the ability to mobilise the resources of the members to joint action which serves as an ultimate power base of the collectivity.</p></span></li></ul>\nIt is suggested that these criteria bridge the gap between the theoretical notion and holistic empirical research, which must draw on ideas from a variety of research traditions.</div>","PeriodicalId":101144,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(87)90005-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workers' collectivity at the workplace as an independent organisational mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Kari Lilja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0281-7527(87)90005-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A distinctive feature of some manufacturing workplaces has been that the negotiated order of day-to-day operations is dependent on the consent of a workplace-level collectivity of workers. Despite Lysgaard's (1961) stimulating contribution very little empirical research exists on this topic. This article discusses potential criteria which could be used in the identification of workers' workplace organisations. Instead of overt institutional mechanisms the <em>differentia specifica</em> of a workers' workplace organisation is linked </p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>(1) to the existence of leadership over and above lower-level collectivities,</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>(2) to the existence of a factory consciousness which distinguishes workers' workplace organisations from other local collectivities and</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>(3) to the ability to mobilise the resources of the members to joint action which serves as an ultimate power base of the collectivity.</p></span></li></ul>\\nIt is suggested that these criteria bridge the gap between the theoretical notion and holistic empirical research, which must draw on ideas from a variety of research traditions.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(87)90005-3\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752787900053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752787900053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

一些制造业工作场所的一个显著特征是,日常操作的谈判顺序取决于工作场所工人集体的同意。尽管Lysgaard(1961)做出了令人振奋的贡献,但关于这一主题的实证研究却很少。本文讨论了可用于识别工人工作场所组织的潜在标准。与公开的制度机制不同,工人工作场所组织的具体区别在于:(1)在较低级别集体之上存在领导,(2)存在将工人工作场所组织与其他地方集体区分开来的工厂意识,(3)动员成员资源进行联合行动的能力,这是集体的最终权力基础。建议这些标准弥合了理论概念和整体实证研究之间的差距,而整体实证研究必须借鉴各种研究传统的思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workers' collectivity at the workplace as an independent organisational mechanism

A distinctive feature of some manufacturing workplaces has been that the negotiated order of day-to-day operations is dependent on the consent of a workplace-level collectivity of workers. Despite Lysgaard's (1961) stimulating contribution very little empirical research exists on this topic. This article discusses potential criteria which could be used in the identification of workers' workplace organisations. Instead of overt institutional mechanisms the differentia specifica of a workers' workplace organisation is linked

  • 1.

    (1) to the existence of leadership over and above lower-level collectivities,

  • 2.

    (2) to the existence of a factory consciousness which distinguishes workers' workplace organisations from other local collectivities and

  • 3.

    (3) to the ability to mobilise the resources of the members to joint action which serves as an ultimate power base of the collectivity.

It is suggested that these criteria bridge the gap between the theoretical notion and holistic empirical research, which must draw on ideas from a variety of research traditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信