Y. Mazaheri, Andreas M. Hotker, A. Shukla-Dave, H. Hricak, O. Akin
{"title":"前列腺弥散峰度(DK)成像参数的准确估计","authors":"Y. Mazaheri, Andreas M. Hotker, A. Shukla-Dave, H. Hricak, O. Akin","doi":"10.36879/jcmi.18.000106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the performance of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters in the prostate and\ncompare the estimated parameters to those measured using least squares (LS) estimation.\nMaterials and methods: The institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this Health Insurance Portability and\nAccountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, retrospective study of forty-two patients (median [Md] age=61 years; range: 43-74 years) who underwent\nmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between September and October 2016. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at nine b-values (0-2000 s/mm2\n)\nwere acquired using a 3-T whole-body MRI unit (Discovery MR750; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) equipped with an eight-channel phased\narray coil for signal reception. Diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were estimated from the normal appearing prostate peripheral zone and\nprostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs). The parameters were estimated by fitting the measured MR signal intensities as a function of b-value,\nusing LS and ML algorithms. An estimate of the noise was obtained on the b=0 images in an artifact-free ROI in the rectum. Simulations were also\ncarried out to assess the properties of the two estimators in a range of signal-to-noise ratios.\nResults: For benign ROIs, the mean D ± standard deviation, (1.88±0.52)×10-3 mm2\n/sec, and mean K (0.79±0.20), measured using LS estimation,\ndiffered significantly from the mean D (1.96±0.48)×10-3 mm2\n/sec and mean K (0.68±0.21), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). For\nmalignant ROIs, the mean D (1.48±0.38)×10-3 mm2\n/sec and mean K (0.94±0.20), measured using LS estimation, differed significantly from the\nmean D (1.54±0.36)×10-3 mm2\n/sec and mean K (0.81±0.19), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). Simulations demonstrate that ML\nminimizes the bias estimate of DK parameters within the signal-to-noise ratio range of 5-15.\nConclusion: By incorporating the noise level, the ML estimation increases the accuracy of DK parameter estimation. In vivo results with phased\narray coils showed significant differences in DK parameter estimates with ML as compared with the standard LS estimation.","PeriodicalId":91401,"journal":{"name":"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters of the prostate\",\"authors\":\"Y. Mazaheri, Andreas M. Hotker, A. Shukla-Dave, H. Hricak, O. Akin\",\"doi\":\"10.36879/jcmi.18.000106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To evaluate the performance of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters in the prostate and\\ncompare the estimated parameters to those measured using least squares (LS) estimation.\\nMaterials and methods: The institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this Health Insurance Portability and\\nAccountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, retrospective study of forty-two patients (median [Md] age=61 years; range: 43-74 years) who underwent\\nmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between September and October 2016. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at nine b-values (0-2000 s/mm2\\n)\\nwere acquired using a 3-T whole-body MRI unit (Discovery MR750; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) equipped with an eight-channel phased\\narray coil for signal reception. Diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were estimated from the normal appearing prostate peripheral zone and\\nprostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs). The parameters were estimated by fitting the measured MR signal intensities as a function of b-value,\\nusing LS and ML algorithms. An estimate of the noise was obtained on the b=0 images in an artifact-free ROI in the rectum. Simulations were also\\ncarried out to assess the properties of the two estimators in a range of signal-to-noise ratios.\\nResults: For benign ROIs, the mean D ± standard deviation, (1.88±0.52)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec, and mean K (0.79±0.20), measured using LS estimation,\\ndiffered significantly from the mean D (1.96±0.48)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec and mean K (0.68±0.21), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). For\\nmalignant ROIs, the mean D (1.48±0.38)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec and mean K (0.94±0.20), measured using LS estimation, differed significantly from the\\nmean D (1.54±0.36)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec and mean K (0.81±0.19), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). Simulations demonstrate that ML\\nminimizes the bias estimate of DK parameters within the signal-to-noise ratio range of 5-15.\\nConclusion: By incorporating the noise level, the ML estimation increases the accuracy of DK parameter estimation. In vivo results with phased\\narray coils showed significant differences in DK parameter estimates with ML as compared with the standard LS estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36879/jcmi.18.000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36879/jcmi.18.000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accurate estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters of the prostate
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters in the prostate and
compare the estimated parameters to those measured using least squares (LS) estimation.
Materials and methods: The institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, retrospective study of forty-two patients (median [Md] age=61 years; range: 43-74 years) who underwent
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between September and October 2016. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at nine b-values (0-2000 s/mm2
)
were acquired using a 3-T whole-body MRI unit (Discovery MR750; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) equipped with an eight-channel phased
array coil for signal reception. Diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were estimated from the normal appearing prostate peripheral zone and
prostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs). The parameters were estimated by fitting the measured MR signal intensities as a function of b-value,
using LS and ML algorithms. An estimate of the noise was obtained on the b=0 images in an artifact-free ROI in the rectum. Simulations were also
carried out to assess the properties of the two estimators in a range of signal-to-noise ratios.
Results: For benign ROIs, the mean D ± standard deviation, (1.88±0.52)×10-3 mm2
/sec, and mean K (0.79±0.20), measured using LS estimation,
differed significantly from the mean D (1.96±0.48)×10-3 mm2
/sec and mean K (0.68±0.21), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). For
malignant ROIs, the mean D (1.48±0.38)×10-3 mm2
/sec and mean K (0.94±0.20), measured using LS estimation, differed significantly from the
mean D (1.54±0.36)×10-3 mm2
/sec and mean K (0.81±0.19), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). Simulations demonstrate that ML
minimizes the bias estimate of DK parameters within the signal-to-noise ratio range of 5-15.
Conclusion: By incorporating the noise level, the ML estimation increases the accuracy of DK parameter estimation. In vivo results with phased
array coils showed significant differences in DK parameter estimates with ML as compared with the standard LS estimation.