前列腺弥散峰度(DK)成像参数的准确估计

Y. Mazaheri, Andreas M. Hotker, A. Shukla-Dave, H. Hricak, O. Akin
{"title":"前列腺弥散峰度(DK)成像参数的准确估计","authors":"Y. Mazaheri, Andreas M. Hotker, A. Shukla-Dave, H. Hricak, O. Akin","doi":"10.36879/jcmi.18.000106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the performance of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters in the prostate and\ncompare the estimated parameters to those measured using least squares (LS) estimation.\nMaterials and methods: The institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this Health Insurance Portability and\nAccountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, retrospective study of forty-two patients (median [Md] age=61 years; range: 43-74 years) who underwent\nmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between September and October 2016. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at nine b-values (0-2000 s/mm2\n)\nwere acquired using a 3-T whole-body MRI unit (Discovery MR750; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) equipped with an eight-channel phased\narray coil for signal reception. Diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were estimated from the normal appearing prostate peripheral zone and\nprostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs). The parameters were estimated by fitting the measured MR signal intensities as a function of b-value,\nusing LS and ML algorithms. An estimate of the noise was obtained on the b=0 images in an artifact-free ROI in the rectum. Simulations were also\ncarried out to assess the properties of the two estimators in a range of signal-to-noise ratios.\nResults: For benign ROIs, the mean D ± standard deviation, (1.88±0.52)×10-3 mm2\n/sec, and mean K (0.79±0.20), measured using LS estimation,\ndiffered significantly from the mean D (1.96±0.48)×10-3 mm2\n/sec and mean K (0.68±0.21), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). For\nmalignant ROIs, the mean D (1.48±0.38)×10-3 mm2\n/sec and mean K (0.94±0.20), measured using LS estimation, differed significantly from the\nmean D (1.54±0.36)×10-3 mm2\n/sec and mean K (0.81±0.19), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). Simulations demonstrate that ML\nminimizes the bias estimate of DK parameters within the signal-to-noise ratio range of 5-15.\nConclusion: By incorporating the noise level, the ML estimation increases the accuracy of DK parameter estimation. In vivo results with phased\narray coils showed significant differences in DK parameter estimates with ML as compared with the standard LS estimation.","PeriodicalId":91401,"journal":{"name":"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters of the prostate\",\"authors\":\"Y. Mazaheri, Andreas M. Hotker, A. Shukla-Dave, H. Hricak, O. Akin\",\"doi\":\"10.36879/jcmi.18.000106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To evaluate the performance of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters in the prostate and\\ncompare the estimated parameters to those measured using least squares (LS) estimation.\\nMaterials and methods: The institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this Health Insurance Portability and\\nAccountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, retrospective study of forty-two patients (median [Md] age=61 years; range: 43-74 years) who underwent\\nmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between September and October 2016. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at nine b-values (0-2000 s/mm2\\n)\\nwere acquired using a 3-T whole-body MRI unit (Discovery MR750; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) equipped with an eight-channel phased\\narray coil for signal reception. Diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were estimated from the normal appearing prostate peripheral zone and\\nprostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs). The parameters were estimated by fitting the measured MR signal intensities as a function of b-value,\\nusing LS and ML algorithms. An estimate of the noise was obtained on the b=0 images in an artifact-free ROI in the rectum. Simulations were also\\ncarried out to assess the properties of the two estimators in a range of signal-to-noise ratios.\\nResults: For benign ROIs, the mean D ± standard deviation, (1.88±0.52)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec, and mean K (0.79±0.20), measured using LS estimation,\\ndiffered significantly from the mean D (1.96±0.48)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec and mean K (0.68±0.21), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). For\\nmalignant ROIs, the mean D (1.48±0.38)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec and mean K (0.94±0.20), measured using LS estimation, differed significantly from the\\nmean D (1.54±0.36)×10-3 mm2\\n/sec and mean K (0.81±0.19), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). Simulations demonstrate that ML\\nminimizes the bias estimate of DK parameters within the signal-to-noise ratio range of 5-15.\\nConclusion: By incorporating the noise level, the ML estimation increases the accuracy of DK parameter estimation. In vivo results with phased\\narray coils showed significant differences in DK parameter estimates with ML as compared with the standard LS estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36879/jcmi.18.000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SM journal of clinical and medical imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36879/jcmi.18.000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价前列腺弥散峰度(DK)成像参数的最大似然(ML)估计的性能,并将估计的参数与最小二乘(LS)估计的参数进行比较。材料和方法:机构审查委员会对这项符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的回顾性研究发布了知情同意豁免,研究对象为42例患者(中位[Md]年龄=61岁;范围:43-74岁),于2016年9月至10月接受了磁共振成像(MRI)。使用3-T全身MRI单元(Discovery MR750;GE医疗系统公司(Waukesha, WI)配备了一个用于信号接收的八通道相控阵线圈。扩散系数(D)和峰度(K)由正常前列腺外周区和前列腺癌感兴趣区(ROIs)估计。使用LS和ML算法通过拟合测量的MR信号强度作为b值的函数来估计参数。在直肠无伪影ROI中获得b=0图像上的噪声估计。还进行了仿真,以评估两个估计器在信噪比范围内的性能。结果:对于良性roi,使用LS估计测量的平均D±标准差(1.88±0.52)×10-3 mm2/sec,平均K(0.79±0.20)与使用ML估计测量的平均D(1.96±0.48)×10-3 mm2/sec和平均K(0.68±0.21)显着差异(P<0.001)。使用LS估计的平均D(1.48±0.38)×10-3 mm2/sec和平均K(0.94±0.20)与使用ML估计的平均D(1.54±0.36)×10-3 mm2/sec和平均K(0.81±0.19)有显著差异(两者的P<0.001)。仿真结果表明,在信噪比为5-15的范围内,mlc能使DK参数的偏置估计最小化。结论:通过加入噪声水平,ML估计提高了DK参数估计的准确性。相控阵线圈的体内实验结果显示,与标准LS估计相比,ML估计的DK参数有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accurate estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters of the prostate
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging parameters in the prostate and compare the estimated parameters to those measured using least squares (LS) estimation. Materials and methods: The institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, retrospective study of forty-two patients (median [Md] age=61 years; range: 43-74 years) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between September and October 2016. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at nine b-values (0-2000 s/mm2 ) were acquired using a 3-T whole-body MRI unit (Discovery MR750; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) equipped with an eight-channel phased array coil for signal reception. Diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were estimated from the normal appearing prostate peripheral zone and prostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs). The parameters were estimated by fitting the measured MR signal intensities as a function of b-value, using LS and ML algorithms. An estimate of the noise was obtained on the b=0 images in an artifact-free ROI in the rectum. Simulations were also carried out to assess the properties of the two estimators in a range of signal-to-noise ratios. Results: For benign ROIs, the mean D ± standard deviation, (1.88±0.52)×10-3 mm2 /sec, and mean K (0.79±0.20), measured using LS estimation, differed significantly from the mean D (1.96±0.48)×10-3 mm2 /sec and mean K (0.68±0.21), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). For malignant ROIs, the mean D (1.48±0.38)×10-3 mm2 /sec and mean K (0.94±0.20), measured using LS estimation, differed significantly from the mean D (1.54±0.36)×10-3 mm2 /sec and mean K (0.81±0.19), measured using ML estimation (P<0.001 for both). Simulations demonstrate that ML minimizes the bias estimate of DK parameters within the signal-to-noise ratio range of 5-15. Conclusion: By incorporating the noise level, the ML estimation increases the accuracy of DK parameter estimation. In vivo results with phased array coils showed significant differences in DK parameter estimates with ML as compared with the standard LS estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信