{"title":"当前国际民用航空法解释中的法律问题","authors":"R. Abeyratne","doi":"10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The progress of international civil aviation law is anchored on two main sources: The Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention); and Resolutions adopted by the Assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). These two sources give rise to subsidiary guidance in the form of Annexes to the Convention and manuals on various subjects that address international civil aviation. However, there is no cohesive link between the two sources as well as there being no formal recognition by ICAO of the legal status of Assembly Resolutions, although such resolutions are adopted at each ICAO Assembly with monotonous regularity. Added to this conundrum is the lack of clarity in the interpretation of the Convention itself, which empowers the Council of ICAO to adopt Annexes to the Convention (which, according to the Convention are so named for convenience) while at the same time taking away any legal obligation of the member States to adhere to the Standards contained in the Annexes. This article discusses the nature of international civil aviation law against the backdrop of treaty law and examines the legal issues that arise from the interpretation of the Chicago Convention and Resolutions adopted by the ICAO Assembly.","PeriodicalId":41655,"journal":{"name":"中国法学前沿","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Legal Problems in Interpreting International Civil Aviation Law\",\"authors\":\"R. Abeyratne\",\"doi\":\"10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The progress of international civil aviation law is anchored on two main sources: The Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention); and Resolutions adopted by the Assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). These two sources give rise to subsidiary guidance in the form of Annexes to the Convention and manuals on various subjects that address international civil aviation. However, there is no cohesive link between the two sources as well as there being no formal recognition by ICAO of the legal status of Assembly Resolutions, although such resolutions are adopted at each ICAO Assembly with monotonous regularity. Added to this conundrum is the lack of clarity in the interpretation of the Convention itself, which empowers the Council of ICAO to adopt Annexes to the Convention (which, according to the Convention are so named for convenience) while at the same time taking away any legal obligation of the member States to adhere to the Standards contained in the Annexes. This article discusses the nature of international civil aviation law against the backdrop of treaty law and examines the legal issues that arise from the interpretation of the Chicago Convention and Resolutions adopted by the ICAO Assembly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国法学前沿\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国法学前沿\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.08\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国法学前沿","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current Legal Problems in Interpreting International Civil Aviation Law
The progress of international civil aviation law is anchored on two main sources: The Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention); and Resolutions adopted by the Assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). These two sources give rise to subsidiary guidance in the form of Annexes to the Convention and manuals on various subjects that address international civil aviation. However, there is no cohesive link between the two sources as well as there being no formal recognition by ICAO of the legal status of Assembly Resolutions, although such resolutions are adopted at each ICAO Assembly with monotonous regularity. Added to this conundrum is the lack of clarity in the interpretation of the Convention itself, which empowers the Council of ICAO to adopt Annexes to the Convention (which, according to the Convention are so named for convenience) while at the same time taking away any legal obligation of the member States to adhere to the Standards contained in the Annexes. This article discusses the nature of international civil aviation law against the backdrop of treaty law and examines the legal issues that arise from the interpretation of the Chicago Convention and Resolutions adopted by the ICAO Assembly.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers of Law in China seeks to provide a forum for a broad blend of peer-reviewed academic papers of law studies, in order to promote communication and cooperation between jurists in China and abroad. It will reflect the substantial advances that are currently being made in Chinese universities in the field of law. Its coverage includes all main branches of law, such as jurisprudence, constitutional jurisprudence, science of civil and commercial law, science of economic law, science of environmental law, science of intellectual property, science of criminal justice, science of procedural law, science of administrative law, science of international law, science of legal history, science of history of legal thoughts, etc.