镍钛和不锈钢封闭螺旋弹簧产生的拉伸时间相关力的体外研究

Jennifer Xavier Ongko, M. Yusuf, Siti Bahirrah
{"title":"镍钛和不锈钢封闭螺旋弹簧产生的拉伸时间相关力的体外研究","authors":"Jennifer Xavier Ongko, M. Yusuf, Siti Bahirrah","doi":"10.22146/majkedgiind.74970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Closed coil spring is an additional tool in a fixed-orthodontic treatment. NiTi is an orthodontic alloy that has shape memory and elasticity features, while stainless steel has properties of malleability, low friction between wire-bracket, as well as easy soldering and welding. Various properties of closed coil springs have been widely studied, but research on the stretching time remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effect and differences in the stretching time for 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days on the force magnitude of NiTi and stainless-steel (SS) closed coil spring. A 7 x 5 x 1 cm acrylic blocks with 1 cm acrylic posts were employed, and 25 mm closed coil springs were attached to the acrylic posts using modified T-sticks. The springs were immersed in an artificial saliva with pH of 6.75 for 7, 14, 21, and 28 days in an incubator at 37 °C. The container was removed from the incubator and the force was measured using a universal testing machine. Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test was carried out to analyze parametricdata, while independent T-test was used to determine the difference between each group. There was a significant effect of stretching time on the force magnitude of the SS closed coil spring in all the groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant effect of stretching time on the force of the NiTi closed coil spring on days 7, 14, and 21 (p > 0.05) but there was a significant effect on day 28 (p < 0.05). A significant effect between the ratio of the SS and NiTi closed coil spring (p < 0.05) was confirmed. Longer stretching time indicated a force loss in the SS closed-coil spring, while the NiTi spring had a more stable force which implies a formidable treatment-time for orthodontic treatment.","PeriodicalId":31262,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro study of the stretching time-associated force magnitude generated by NiTi and stainless-steel closed coil springs\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Xavier Ongko, M. Yusuf, Siti Bahirrah\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/majkedgiind.74970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Closed coil spring is an additional tool in a fixed-orthodontic treatment. NiTi is an orthodontic alloy that has shape memory and elasticity features, while stainless steel has properties of malleability, low friction between wire-bracket, as well as easy soldering and welding. Various properties of closed coil springs have been widely studied, but research on the stretching time remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effect and differences in the stretching time for 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days on the force magnitude of NiTi and stainless-steel (SS) closed coil spring. A 7 x 5 x 1 cm acrylic blocks with 1 cm acrylic posts were employed, and 25 mm closed coil springs were attached to the acrylic posts using modified T-sticks. The springs were immersed in an artificial saliva with pH of 6.75 for 7, 14, 21, and 28 days in an incubator at 37 °C. The container was removed from the incubator and the force was measured using a universal testing machine. Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test was carried out to analyze parametricdata, while independent T-test was used to determine the difference between each group. There was a significant effect of stretching time on the force magnitude of the SS closed coil spring in all the groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant effect of stretching time on the force of the NiTi closed coil spring on days 7, 14, and 21 (p > 0.05) but there was a significant effect on day 28 (p < 0.05). A significant effect between the ratio of the SS and NiTi closed coil spring (p < 0.05) was confirmed. Longer stretching time indicated a force loss in the SS closed-coil spring, while the NiTi spring had a more stable force which implies a formidable treatment-time for orthodontic treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.74970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.74970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

封闭线圈弹簧是固定正畸治疗的附加工具。NiTi是一种具有形状记忆和弹性特性的正畸合金,而不锈钢具有延展性、丝托间摩擦小、易钎焊和焊接等特性。闭式螺旋弹簧的各种性能已被广泛研究,但对其拉伸时间的研究尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定拉伸时间为7天、14天、21天和28天对NiTi和不锈钢(SS)封闭线圈弹簧的受力大小的影响和差异。采用7 × 5 × 1厘米的丙烯酸块和1厘米的丙烯酸柱子,并使用改良的t型棒将25毫米的封闭螺旋弹簧连接到丙烯酸柱子上。在37°C的培养箱中,将弹簧浸入pH为6.75的人工唾液中7、14、21和28天。将容器从培养箱中取出,用万能试验机测量力。参数资料分析采用Kolmogorov-Smirnoff检验,各组间差异采用独立t检验。拉伸时间对SS闭合线圈弹簧的受力大小有显著影响(p < 0.05)。拉伸时间在第7、14、21天对NiTi闭合线圈弹簧的受力无显著影响(p > 0.05),但在第28天有显著影响(p < 0.05)。SS与NiTi闭合线圈弹簧的比值有显著影响(p < 0.05)。拉伸时间越长,SS闭合线圈弹簧的力损失越大,而NiTi弹簧的力更稳定,正畸治疗时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro study of the stretching time-associated force magnitude generated by NiTi and stainless-steel closed coil springs
Closed coil spring is an additional tool in a fixed-orthodontic treatment. NiTi is an orthodontic alloy that has shape memory and elasticity features, while stainless steel has properties of malleability, low friction between wire-bracket, as well as easy soldering and welding. Various properties of closed coil springs have been widely studied, but research on the stretching time remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effect and differences in the stretching time for 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days on the force magnitude of NiTi and stainless-steel (SS) closed coil spring. A 7 x 5 x 1 cm acrylic blocks with 1 cm acrylic posts were employed, and 25 mm closed coil springs were attached to the acrylic posts using modified T-sticks. The springs were immersed in an artificial saliva with pH of 6.75 for 7, 14, 21, and 28 days in an incubator at 37 °C. The container was removed from the incubator and the force was measured using a universal testing machine. Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test was carried out to analyze parametricdata, while independent T-test was used to determine the difference between each group. There was a significant effect of stretching time on the force magnitude of the SS closed coil spring in all the groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant effect of stretching time on the force of the NiTi closed coil spring on days 7, 14, and 21 (p > 0.05) but there was a significant effect on day 28 (p < 0.05). A significant effect between the ratio of the SS and NiTi closed coil spring (p < 0.05) was confirmed. Longer stretching time indicated a force loss in the SS closed-coil spring, while the NiTi spring had a more stable force which implies a formidable treatment-time for orthodontic treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信