机会成本如何改变对 农场生存能力的看法?来自欧盟的经验证据

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
J. Špička, Petr Dereník
{"title":"机会成本如何改变对 农场生存能力的看法?来自欧盟的经验证据","authors":"J. Špička, Petr Dereník","doi":"10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy targets at supporting small and medium-sized farms. Capping and redistribution of direct payments would have a direct impact on the economic viability of farms. Calculation of economic income is a reasonable way how to calculate the economic viability of firms. However, accounting profit has been preferred for its estimation so far. The article aims to compare the income from accounting and economic point of view and reveal how much the results differ across the EU. The literature review, an empirical analysis based on Farm Accountancy Data Network (2016–2018), and a clustered heat map were applied. The results provide clear evidence of high variability of opportunity costs when calculating the economic viability in the EU, especially between countries with small intensive farms and some post-communist countries where larger farms dominate.","PeriodicalId":48961,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika","volume":"76 1","pages":"41-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How opportunity costs change the view on the viability of farms? Empirical evidence from the EU\",\"authors\":\"J. Špička, Petr Dereník\",\"doi\":\"10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy targets at supporting small and medium-sized farms. Capping and redistribution of direct payments would have a direct impact on the economic viability of farms. Calculation of economic income is a reasonable way how to calculate the economic viability of firms. However, accounting profit has been preferred for its estimation so far. The article aims to compare the income from accounting and economic point of view and reveal how much the results differ across the EU. The literature review, an empirical analysis based on Farm Accountancy Data Network (2016–2018), and a clustered heat map were applied. The results provide clear evidence of high variability of opportunity costs when calculating the economic viability in the EU, especially between countries with small intensive farms and some post-communist countries where larger farms dominate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"41-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2020年后共同农业政策的目标是支持中小农场。直接补贴的上限和再分配将对农场的经济生存能力产生直接影响。经济收益的计算是衡量企业经济生存能力的一种合理方法。然而,迄今为止,会计利润一直是其估计的首选方法。本文旨在从会计和经济角度比较收入,并揭示欧盟各国的结果差异有多大。本文采用文献综述、基于农场会计数据网络(2016-2018)的实证分析和聚类热力图。在计算欧盟的经济可行性时,特别是在拥有小型集约化农场的国家和一些大型农场占主导地位的后共产主义国家之间,研究结果提供了明确的证据,表明机会成本具有很高的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How opportunity costs change the view on the viability of farms? Empirical evidence from the EU
The post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy targets at supporting small and medium-sized farms. Capping and redistribution of direct payments would have a direct impact on the economic viability of farms. Calculation of economic income is a reasonable way how to calculate the economic viability of firms. However, accounting profit has been preferred for its estimation so far. The article aims to compare the income from accounting and economic point of view and reveal how much the results differ across the EU. The literature review, an empirical analysis based on Farm Accountancy Data Network (2016–2018), and a clustered heat map were applied. The results provide clear evidence of high variability of opportunity costs when calculating the economic viability in the EU, especially between countries with small intensive farms and some post-communist countries where larger farms dominate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika
Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika Agricultural Economics & Policy-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
47
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: An international peer-reviewed journal published under the auspices of the Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences and financed by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Published since 1954 (by 1999 under the title Zemědělská ekonomika).Thematic scope: original scientific papers dealing with agricultural subjects from the sphere of economics, management, informatics, ecology, social economy and sociology. Since 1993 the papers continually treat problems which were published in the journal Sociologie venkova a zemědělství until now. An extensive scope of subjects in fact covers the whole of agribusiness, that means economic relations of suppliers and producers of inputs for agriculture and food industry, problems from the aspects of social economy and rural sociology and finally the economics of the population nutrition. Papers are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信