通过使用遗传变异作为工具变量来解决调解分析询问的新建议

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Claudia Coscia, Esther Molina-Montes, Raquel Benítez, Evangelina López de Maturana, Alfonso Muriel, Núria Malats, Teresa Pérez
{"title":"通过使用遗传变异作为工具变量来解决调解分析询问的新建议","authors":"Claudia Coscia,&nbsp;Esther Molina-Montes,&nbsp;Raquel Benítez,&nbsp;Evangelina López de Maturana,&nbsp;Alfonso Muriel,&nbsp;Núria Malats,&nbsp;Teresa Pérez","doi":"10.1002/gepi.22519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The application of causal mediation analysis (CMA) considering the mediation effect of a third variable is increasing in epidemiological studies; however, this requires fitting strong assumptions on confounding bias. To address this limitation, we propose an extension of CMA combining it with Mendelian randomization (MRinCMA). We applied the new approach to analyse the causal effect of obesity and diabetes on pancreatic cancer, considering each factor as potential mediator. To check the performance of MRinCMA under several conditions/scenarios, we used it in different simulated data sets and compared it with structural equation models. For continuous variables, MRinCMA and structural equation models performed similarly, suggesting that both approaches are valid to obtain unbiased estimates. When noncontinuous variables were considered, MRinCMA presented, overall, lower bias than structural equation models. By applying MRinCMA, we did not find any evidence of causality of obesity or diabetes on pancreatic cancer. With this new methodology, researchers would be able to address CMA hypotheses by appropriately accounting for the confounding bias assumption regardless of the conditions used in their studies in different settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"47 3","pages":"287-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.22519","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New proposal to address mediation analysis interrogations by using genetic variants as instrumental variables\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Coscia,&nbsp;Esther Molina-Montes,&nbsp;Raquel Benítez,&nbsp;Evangelina López de Maturana,&nbsp;Alfonso Muriel,&nbsp;Núria Malats,&nbsp;Teresa Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gepi.22519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The application of causal mediation analysis (CMA) considering the mediation effect of a third variable is increasing in epidemiological studies; however, this requires fitting strong assumptions on confounding bias. To address this limitation, we propose an extension of CMA combining it with Mendelian randomization (MRinCMA). We applied the new approach to analyse the causal effect of obesity and diabetes on pancreatic cancer, considering each factor as potential mediator. To check the performance of MRinCMA under several conditions/scenarios, we used it in different simulated data sets and compared it with structural equation models. For continuous variables, MRinCMA and structural equation models performed similarly, suggesting that both approaches are valid to obtain unbiased estimates. When noncontinuous variables were considered, MRinCMA presented, overall, lower bias than structural equation models. By applying MRinCMA, we did not find any evidence of causality of obesity or diabetes on pancreatic cancer. With this new methodology, researchers would be able to address CMA hypotheses by appropriately accounting for the confounding bias assumption regardless of the conditions used in their studies in different settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetic Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"287-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.22519\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetic Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.22519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.22519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑第三变量中介作用的因果中介分析(CMA)在流行病学研究中的应用越来越多;然而,这需要对混杂偏差进行强有力的假设。为了解决这一限制,我们提出了将CMA与孟德尔随机化(MRinCMA)相结合的扩展CMA。我们应用新方法分析肥胖和糖尿病对胰腺癌的因果关系,考虑每个因素作为潜在的中介。为了验证MRinCMA在不同条件/场景下的性能,我们在不同的模拟数据集中使用了它,并将其与结构方程模型进行了比较。对于连续变量,MRinCMA和结构方程模型的表现相似,表明这两种方法都是有效的,可以获得无偏估计。当考虑不连续变量时,MRinCMA总体上比结构方程模型具有更低的偏差。通过应用MRinCMA,我们没有发现肥胖或糖尿病与胰腺癌因果关系的任何证据。有了这种新方法,研究人员将能够通过适当地考虑混杂偏差假设来解决CMA假设,而不管他们在不同环境下的研究中使用的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

New proposal to address mediation analysis interrogations by using genetic variants as instrumental variables

New proposal to address mediation analysis interrogations by using genetic variants as instrumental variables

The application of causal mediation analysis (CMA) considering the mediation effect of a third variable is increasing in epidemiological studies; however, this requires fitting strong assumptions on confounding bias. To address this limitation, we propose an extension of CMA combining it with Mendelian randomization (MRinCMA). We applied the new approach to analyse the causal effect of obesity and diabetes on pancreatic cancer, considering each factor as potential mediator. To check the performance of MRinCMA under several conditions/scenarios, we used it in different simulated data sets and compared it with structural equation models. For continuous variables, MRinCMA and structural equation models performed similarly, suggesting that both approaches are valid to obtain unbiased estimates. When noncontinuous variables were considered, MRinCMA presented, overall, lower bias than structural equation models. By applying MRinCMA, we did not find any evidence of causality of obesity or diabetes on pancreatic cancer. With this new methodology, researchers would be able to address CMA hypotheses by appropriately accounting for the confounding bias assumption regardless of the conditions used in their studies in different settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetic Epidemiology
Genetic Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations. Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信