使用故障分析进行浮点精度调优

Cindy Rubio-González, Cuong Nguyen, Ben Mehne, Koushik Sen, J. Demmel, W. Kahan, Costin Iancu, W. Lavrijsen, D. Bailey, David G. Hough
{"title":"使用故障分析进行浮点精度调优","authors":"Cindy Rubio-González, Cuong Nguyen, Ben Mehne, Koushik Sen, J. Demmel, W. Kahan, Costin Iancu, W. Lavrijsen, D. Bailey, David G. Hough","doi":"10.1145/2884781.2884850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While tremendously useful, automated techniques for tuning the precision of floating-point programs face important scalability challenges. We present Blame Analysis, a novel dynamic approach that speeds up precision tuning. Blame Analysis performs floating-point instructions using different levels of accuracy for their operands. The analysis determines the precision of all operands such that a given precision is achieved in the final result of the program. Our evaluation on ten scientific programs shows that Blame Analysis is successful in lowering operand precision. As it executes the program only once, the analysis is particularly useful when targeting reductions in execution time. In such case, the analysis needs to be combined with search-based tools such as Precimonious. Our experiments show that combining Blame Analysis with Precimonious leads to obtaining better results with significant reduction in analysis time: the optimized programs execute faster (in three cases, we observe as high as 39.9% program speedup) and the combined analysis time is 9× faster on average, and up to 38× faster than Precimonious alone.","PeriodicalId":6485,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"40 1","pages":"1074-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Floating-Point Precision Tuning Using Blame Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Rubio-González, Cuong Nguyen, Ben Mehne, Koushik Sen, J. Demmel, W. Kahan, Costin Iancu, W. Lavrijsen, D. Bailey, David G. Hough\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2884781.2884850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While tremendously useful, automated techniques for tuning the precision of floating-point programs face important scalability challenges. We present Blame Analysis, a novel dynamic approach that speeds up precision tuning. Blame Analysis performs floating-point instructions using different levels of accuracy for their operands. The analysis determines the precision of all operands such that a given precision is achieved in the final result of the program. Our evaluation on ten scientific programs shows that Blame Analysis is successful in lowering operand precision. As it executes the program only once, the analysis is particularly useful when targeting reductions in execution time. In such case, the analysis needs to be combined with search-based tools such as Precimonious. Our experiments show that combining Blame Analysis with Precimonious leads to obtaining better results with significant reduction in analysis time: the optimized programs execute faster (in three cases, we observe as high as 39.9% program speedup) and the combined analysis time is 9× faster on average, and up to 38× faster than Precimonious alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"1074-1085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

虽然非常有用,但用于调优浮点程序精度的自动化技术面临着重要的可伸缩性挑战。我们提出了责备分析,一种新的动态方法,加快了精度调整。责备分析使用不同精度级别的操作数执行浮点指令。分析确定所有操作数的精度,以便在程序的最终结果中达到给定的精度。我们对十个科学方案的评价表明,责备分析在降低操作数精度方面是成功的。由于它只执行一次程序,因此在以减少执行时间为目标时,该分析特别有用。在这种情况下,分析需要与基于搜索的工具(如Precimonious)相结合。我们的实验表明,将Blame Analysis与Precimonious相结合,可以获得更好的结果,并显著减少分析时间:优化后的程序执行速度更快(在三个案例中,我们观察到高达39.9%的程序加速),组合分析时间平均快9倍,比单独使用Precimonious快38倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Floating-Point Precision Tuning Using Blame Analysis
While tremendously useful, automated techniques for tuning the precision of floating-point programs face important scalability challenges. We present Blame Analysis, a novel dynamic approach that speeds up precision tuning. Blame Analysis performs floating-point instructions using different levels of accuracy for their operands. The analysis determines the precision of all operands such that a given precision is achieved in the final result of the program. Our evaluation on ten scientific programs shows that Blame Analysis is successful in lowering operand precision. As it executes the program only once, the analysis is particularly useful when targeting reductions in execution time. In such case, the analysis needs to be combined with search-based tools such as Precimonious. Our experiments show that combining Blame Analysis with Precimonious leads to obtaining better results with significant reduction in analysis time: the optimized programs execute faster (in three cases, we observe as high as 39.9% program speedup) and the combined analysis time is 9× faster on average, and up to 38× faster than Precimonious alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信