多样性中的统一:性别认同之战的神学分析

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ovidiu Hanc
{"title":"多样性中的统一:性别认同之战的神学分析","authors":"Ovidiu Hanc","doi":"10.51917/dialogo.2021.8.1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"In today’s society, gender identity is redefined. This identity is now disconnected from biological sex and redefined as a cultural phenomenon. The implications are diverse not only from an anthropological point of view but also from a moral stand. As gender becomes a fluid concept, the war between the traditional point of view and the revisionist/progressist one is inevitable. This research reviews how in the last centuries society moved from Theism to Post-Theism and from Post-Theism to Post-Humanism. These shifts reflect a tendency of moral change not only in terms of human identity but also of human sexuality. \nIn this paper, it is argued that a moral dimension is vital for a definition of gender identity. The theological assessment of this topic starts the epistemic endeavor analyzing the biblical foundation of cisgender and sexual dimorphism. In the nature vs. nurture paradigm a thorough analysis of the biblical account of creation and fall of man, attest to the fact that, regardless of how man is born, God’s redemption outlines anthropology, hamartiology, and soteriology.\nAt the practical social level, the struggle for unity in diversity varies from a desideratum to a utopian reality. Nevertheless, the concept of diversity cannot be emptied of its moral dimension. From the Biblical point of view, the solution to this war on sexual identity is redemption, while from the secular point of view the solution to this war is relativism.\"","PeriodicalId":42179,"journal":{"name":"Dialogo","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unity in Diversity: A Theological Analysis of the War on Gender Identity\",\"authors\":\"Ovidiu Hanc\",\"doi\":\"10.51917/dialogo.2021.8.1.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"In today’s society, gender identity is redefined. This identity is now disconnected from biological sex and redefined as a cultural phenomenon. The implications are diverse not only from an anthropological point of view but also from a moral stand. As gender becomes a fluid concept, the war between the traditional point of view and the revisionist/progressist one is inevitable. This research reviews how in the last centuries society moved from Theism to Post-Theism and from Post-Theism to Post-Humanism. These shifts reflect a tendency of moral change not only in terms of human identity but also of human sexuality. \\nIn this paper, it is argued that a moral dimension is vital for a definition of gender identity. The theological assessment of this topic starts the epistemic endeavor analyzing the biblical foundation of cisgender and sexual dimorphism. In the nature vs. nurture paradigm a thorough analysis of the biblical account of creation and fall of man, attest to the fact that, regardless of how man is born, God’s redemption outlines anthropology, hamartiology, and soteriology.\\nAt the practical social level, the struggle for unity in diversity varies from a desideratum to a utopian reality. Nevertheless, the concept of diversity cannot be emptied of its moral dimension. From the Biblical point of view, the solution to this war on sexual identity is redemption, while from the secular point of view the solution to this war is relativism.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":42179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogo\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51917/dialogo.2021.8.1.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51917/dialogo.2021.8.1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“在当今社会,性别认同被重新定义。这种身份现在与生理性别脱节,并被重新定义为一种文化现象。不仅从人类学的角度来看,而且从道德的角度来看,其含义是多种多样的。随着性别成为一个流动的概念,传统观点与修正主义/进步主义观点之间的战争是不可避免的。本研究回顾了上个世纪社会如何从有神论走向后有神论,又从后有神论走向后人文主义。这些转变不仅反映了人类身份的道德变化趋势,也反映了人类性取向的道德变化趋势。本文认为,道德维度对于性别认同的定义至关重要。对这一主题的神学评价开始了对顺性和两性二态论的圣经基础的认识努力。在先天vs后天范式中,对圣经中关于人的创造和堕落的描述进行彻底的分析,证明了这样一个事实:不管人是如何出生的,上帝的救赎概述了人类学、伤害学和救赎学。在实际的社会层面上,争取多样性中的统一的斗争从理想到乌托邦的现实各不相同。然而,不能排除多样性概念的道德层面。从圣经的角度来看,解决这场性别认同之战的办法是救赎,而从世俗的角度来看,解决这场战争的办法是相对主义。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unity in Diversity: A Theological Analysis of the War on Gender Identity
"In today’s society, gender identity is redefined. This identity is now disconnected from biological sex and redefined as a cultural phenomenon. The implications are diverse not only from an anthropological point of view but also from a moral stand. As gender becomes a fluid concept, the war between the traditional point of view and the revisionist/progressist one is inevitable. This research reviews how in the last centuries society moved from Theism to Post-Theism and from Post-Theism to Post-Humanism. These shifts reflect a tendency of moral change not only in terms of human identity but also of human sexuality. In this paper, it is argued that a moral dimension is vital for a definition of gender identity. The theological assessment of this topic starts the epistemic endeavor analyzing the biblical foundation of cisgender and sexual dimorphism. In the nature vs. nurture paradigm a thorough analysis of the biblical account of creation and fall of man, attest to the fact that, regardless of how man is born, God’s redemption outlines anthropology, hamartiology, and soteriology. At the practical social level, the struggle for unity in diversity varies from a desideratum to a utopian reality. Nevertheless, the concept of diversity cannot be emptied of its moral dimension. From the Biblical point of view, the solution to this war on sexual identity is redemption, while from the secular point of view the solution to this war is relativism."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogo
Dialogo SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信