{"title":"垂直整合会刺激投资吗?在好莱坞电影公司时代,选角演员发掘明星","authors":"F. Andrew Hanssen, A. Raskovich","doi":"10.1086/710067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Hollywood studio era of the 1930s and 1940s was remarkable for its abundance of glamorous stars. In this paper, we investigate whether the vertical structure of the Hollywood studios, by ensuring studios’ claims to “star capital,” spurred higher levels of investment in discovering stars than was (or is) achievable under alternate regimes (such as today’s film-by-film contracting). The vertical structure consisted of backward integration into talent through long-term contracts and forward integration into exhibition through ownership of theater chains. The investment involved the experimental casting of novice actors to gauge audience appeal. Collecting data on thousands of actors whose careers span nearly three-quarters of a century and conducting several sets of tests, we find evidence of higher levels of investment in actors working under the vertical structure of the studio era than in actors working under alternate regimes. [Those] who were running the studios at that time … gave me a chance—today, you may get one shot, and if you fail, they break your back and forget about you from that time on. Then, you were part of a system that gave you another chance. So, MGM gave me opportunity after opportunity. (Director Richard Brooks [Eyman 2005, p. 419]) You realize that the greatest stars in the picture business were made during an era when they didn’t have one single thing to say about what they did. (Director Howard Hawks [Bogdanovich 1997, p. 362]) The studios owned you, and they wanted their property in great shape. (MGM contract player Jean Porter [Davis 1993, p. 88]) [Those] who were running the studios at that time … gave me a chance—today, you may get one shot, and if you fail, they break your back and forget about you from that time on. Then, you were part of a system that gave you another chance. So, MGM gave me opportunity after opportunity. (Director Richard Brooks [Eyman 2005, p. 419]) You realize that the greatest stars in the picture business were made during an era when they didn’t have one single thing to say about what they did. (Director Howard Hawks [Bogdanovich 1997, p. 362]) The studios owned you, and they wanted their property in great shape. (MGM contract player Jean Porter [Davis 1993, p. 88])","PeriodicalId":22657,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law and Economics","volume":"43 1","pages":"631 - 666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Vertical Integration Spur Investment? Casting Actors to Discover Stars during the Hollywood Studio Era\",\"authors\":\"F. Andrew Hanssen, A. Raskovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/710067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Hollywood studio era of the 1930s and 1940s was remarkable for its abundance of glamorous stars. In this paper, we investigate whether the vertical structure of the Hollywood studios, by ensuring studios’ claims to “star capital,” spurred higher levels of investment in discovering stars than was (or is) achievable under alternate regimes (such as today’s film-by-film contracting). The vertical structure consisted of backward integration into talent through long-term contracts and forward integration into exhibition through ownership of theater chains. The investment involved the experimental casting of novice actors to gauge audience appeal. Collecting data on thousands of actors whose careers span nearly three-quarters of a century and conducting several sets of tests, we find evidence of higher levels of investment in actors working under the vertical structure of the studio era than in actors working under alternate regimes. [Those] who were running the studios at that time … gave me a chance—today, you may get one shot, and if you fail, they break your back and forget about you from that time on. Then, you were part of a system that gave you another chance. So, MGM gave me opportunity after opportunity. (Director Richard Brooks [Eyman 2005, p. 419]) You realize that the greatest stars in the picture business were made during an era when they didn’t have one single thing to say about what they did. (Director Howard Hawks [Bogdanovich 1997, p. 362]) The studios owned you, and they wanted their property in great shape. (MGM contract player Jean Porter [Davis 1993, p. 88]) [Those] who were running the studios at that time … gave me a chance—today, you may get one shot, and if you fail, they break your back and forget about you from that time on. Then, you were part of a system that gave you another chance. So, MGM gave me opportunity after opportunity. (Director Richard Brooks [Eyman 2005, p. 419]) You realize that the greatest stars in the picture business were made during an era when they didn’t have one single thing to say about what they did. (Director Howard Hawks [Bogdanovich 1997, p. 362]) The studios owned you, and they wanted their property in great shape. (MGM contract player Jean Porter [Davis 1993, p. 88])\",\"PeriodicalId\":22657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Law and Economics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"631 - 666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Law and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/710067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/710067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
20世纪30年代和40年代的好莱坞电影工作室时代以其丰富的迷人明星而闻名。在本文中,我们调查了好莱坞电影公司的垂直结构,通过确保电影公司声称的“明星资本”,是否刺激了在发现明星方面的更高水平的投资,而不是在其他制度下(如今天的电影承包)所能实现的。纵向结构是通过长期合同向后整合人才,通过拥有连锁影院向前整合展览。这项投资包括实验性地挑选新演员,以衡量观众的吸引力。我们收集了数千名演员的数据,他们的职业生涯跨越了近四分之三个世纪,并进行了几组测试,我们发现在工作室时代垂直结构下工作的演员比在其他制度下工作的演员投入更高的证据。那些当时经营工作室的人给了我一个机会——今天,你可能只有一次机会,如果你失败了,他们就会打断你的背,从那时起就把你忘了。然后,你成为了这个体系的一部分,给了你另一次机会。所以,米高梅给了我一个又一个机会。(导演理查德·布鲁克斯[艾曼2005,第419页])你会意识到,电影界最伟大的明星都是在一个他们对自己所做的事情毫无发言权的时代产生的。(导演霍华德·霍克斯[博格达诺维奇1997年,第362页])电影公司拥有你,他们希望他们的财产保持良好状态。(米高梅公司的合同球员吉恩·波特[戴维斯1993,第88页])那些当时经营制片厂的人……给了我一个机会——今天,你可能只有一次机会,如果你失败了,他们就会打断你的背,从那时起就把你忘了。然后,你成为了这个体系的一部分,给了你另一次机会。所以,米高梅给了我一个又一个机会。(导演理查德·布鲁克斯[艾曼2005,第419页])你会意识到,电影界最伟大的明星都是在一个他们对自己所做的事情毫无发言权的时代产生的。(导演霍华德·霍克斯[博格达诺维奇1997年,第362页])电影公司拥有你,他们希望他们的财产保持良好状态。(米高梅的合同球员Jean Porter [Davis 1993, p. 88])
Does Vertical Integration Spur Investment? Casting Actors to Discover Stars during the Hollywood Studio Era
The Hollywood studio era of the 1930s and 1940s was remarkable for its abundance of glamorous stars. In this paper, we investigate whether the vertical structure of the Hollywood studios, by ensuring studios’ claims to “star capital,” spurred higher levels of investment in discovering stars than was (or is) achievable under alternate regimes (such as today’s film-by-film contracting). The vertical structure consisted of backward integration into talent through long-term contracts and forward integration into exhibition through ownership of theater chains. The investment involved the experimental casting of novice actors to gauge audience appeal. Collecting data on thousands of actors whose careers span nearly three-quarters of a century and conducting several sets of tests, we find evidence of higher levels of investment in actors working under the vertical structure of the studio era than in actors working under alternate regimes. [Those] who were running the studios at that time … gave me a chance—today, you may get one shot, and if you fail, they break your back and forget about you from that time on. Then, you were part of a system that gave you another chance. So, MGM gave me opportunity after opportunity. (Director Richard Brooks [Eyman 2005, p. 419]) You realize that the greatest stars in the picture business were made during an era when they didn’t have one single thing to say about what they did. (Director Howard Hawks [Bogdanovich 1997, p. 362]) The studios owned you, and they wanted their property in great shape. (MGM contract player Jean Porter [Davis 1993, p. 88]) [Those] who were running the studios at that time … gave me a chance—today, you may get one shot, and if you fail, they break your back and forget about you from that time on. Then, you were part of a system that gave you another chance. So, MGM gave me opportunity after opportunity. (Director Richard Brooks [Eyman 2005, p. 419]) You realize that the greatest stars in the picture business were made during an era when they didn’t have one single thing to say about what they did. (Director Howard Hawks [Bogdanovich 1997, p. 362]) The studios owned you, and they wanted their property in great shape. (MGM contract player Jean Porter [Davis 1993, p. 88])