并发和分布式伪代码:系统的文献综述

Bryan Alexander Ulate-Caballero, Allan Berrocal Rojas, Jeisson Hidalgo-Céspedes
{"title":"并发和分布式伪代码:系统的文献综述","authors":"Bryan Alexander Ulate-Caballero, Allan Berrocal Rojas, Jeisson Hidalgo-Céspedes","doi":"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pseudocode is a valuable resource used in programming education, software development, and scientific reports for designing algorithmic solutions as it is easy to write, understand, and modify. Since pseudocode is lacking in its ability to be tested, it is difficult to determine whether a pseudocode solution is correct or not. Software tools are specially required to reach this goal, e.g., helping professors find race conditions, deadlocks, or starvation issues while grading students’ concurrent pseudocode. Although there are various tools to work with sequential pseudocode, there is a lack of tools to work with concurrent pseudocode. This shortage motivated us to determine the state-of-the-art in notations and tools for testing concurrent and distributed pseudocode. We conducted a systematic literature review and found only a few related publications, confirming that this topic is understudied. We found and report about five software tools capable of interpreting concurrent or distributed pseudocode, and two software tools capable of verifying its correctness. As another result, no other literature review was found about this topic, conferring novelty to the contributions of this work.","PeriodicalId":6803,"journal":{"name":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent and Distributed Pseudocode: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Alexander Ulate-Caballero, Allan Berrocal Rojas, Jeisson Hidalgo-Céspedes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pseudocode is a valuable resource used in programming education, software development, and scientific reports for designing algorithmic solutions as it is easy to write, understand, and modify. Since pseudocode is lacking in its ability to be tested, it is difficult to determine whether a pseudocode solution is correct or not. Software tools are specially required to reach this goal, e.g., helping professors find race conditions, deadlocks, or starvation issues while grading students’ concurrent pseudocode. Although there are various tools to work with sequential pseudocode, there is a lack of tools to work with concurrent pseudocode. This shortage motivated us to determine the state-of-the-art in notations and tools for testing concurrent and distributed pseudocode. We conducted a systematic literature review and found only a few related publications, confirming that this topic is understudied. We found and report about five software tools capable of interpreting concurrent or distributed pseudocode, and two software tools capable of verifying its correctness. As another result, no other literature review was found about this topic, conferring novelty to the contributions of this work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伪代码是用于编程教育、软件开发和设计算法解决方案的科学报告的宝贵资源,因为它易于编写、理解和修改。由于伪代码缺乏可测试的能力,因此很难确定伪代码解决方案是否正确。为了达到这个目标,软件工具是特别需要的,例如,在给学生的并发伪代码评分时,帮助教授发现竞争条件、死锁或饥饿问题。尽管有各种工具可以处理顺序伪代码,但却缺乏处理并发伪代码的工具。这种不足促使我们确定用于测试并发和分布式伪代码的最先进的符号和工具。我们进行了系统的文献回顾,发现只有少数相关的出版物,证实了这一主题的研究不足。我们发现并报告了五个能够解释并发或分布式伪代码的软件工具,以及两个能够验证其正确性的软件工具。另一个结果是,没有发现关于这个主题的其他文献综述,赋予这项工作的贡献的新颖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concurrent and Distributed Pseudocode: A Systematic Literature Review
Pseudocode is a valuable resource used in programming education, software development, and scientific reports for designing algorithmic solutions as it is easy to write, understand, and modify. Since pseudocode is lacking in its ability to be tested, it is difficult to determine whether a pseudocode solution is correct or not. Software tools are specially required to reach this goal, e.g., helping professors find race conditions, deadlocks, or starvation issues while grading students’ concurrent pseudocode. Although there are various tools to work with sequential pseudocode, there is a lack of tools to work with concurrent pseudocode. This shortage motivated us to determine the state-of-the-art in notations and tools for testing concurrent and distributed pseudocode. We conducted a systematic literature review and found only a few related publications, confirming that this topic is understudied. We found and report about five software tools capable of interpreting concurrent or distributed pseudocode, and two software tools capable of verifying its correctness. As another result, no other literature review was found about this topic, conferring novelty to the contributions of this work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信