{"title":"丘脑底核深部脑刺激在不同频率下会影响静态平衡吗?","authors":"Fatma Oz , Bircan Yucekeya , Irem Huzmeli , Atilla Yilmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2022.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) with different stimulation frequencies on static balance.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty patients (15 males and 5 females), aged between 43 and 81 (mean: 60.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.4) years, who had been diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and undergone STN-DBS surgery were included in the study. Static balance was assessed with TecnoBody Rehabilitation System at four different frequencies: 230, 130, 90 and 60<!--> <!-->Hz and off-stimulation. Static balance tests were ‘stabilometric test, stabilometric compared bipedal closed/opened eye, stabilometric compared mono pedal (right/left foot)’. These tests reported the centre of pressure data ‘ellipse area, perimeter, front/back and mediolateral standard deviations’.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no statically differences between the static balance test results at any frequency (<em>p</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05), but results were found better at 90<!--> <!-->Hz. Stabilometric compared bipedal opened eye forward–backward standard deviation result was significant between off-stimulation and 130<!--> <!-->Hz (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). Different frequency stimulation affected the static balance categories percentage with no statistical significance between off-stimulation and others (all <em>p</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed that STN-DBS did not affect the static balance negatively. Low-frequency (LF) stimulation improved the static equilibrium. Posturography systems will give more precise and quantitative results in similar studies with wide frequency ranges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation affect the static balance at different frequencies?\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Oz , Bircan Yucekeya , Irem Huzmeli , Atilla Yilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucie.2022.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) with different stimulation frequencies on static balance.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty patients (15 males and 5 females), aged between 43 and 81 (mean: 60.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.4) years, who had been diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and undergone STN-DBS surgery were included in the study. Static balance was assessed with TecnoBody Rehabilitation System at four different frequencies: 230, 130, 90 and 60<!--> <!-->Hz and off-stimulation. Static balance tests were ‘stabilometric test, stabilometric compared bipedal closed/opened eye, stabilometric compared mono pedal (right/left foot)’. These tests reported the centre of pressure data ‘ellipse area, perimeter, front/back and mediolateral standard deviations’.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no statically differences between the static balance test results at any frequency (<em>p</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05), but results were found better at 90<!--> <!-->Hz. Stabilometric compared bipedal opened eye forward–backward standard deviation result was significant between off-stimulation and 130<!--> <!-->Hz (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). Different frequency stimulation affected the static balance categories percentage with no statistical significance between off-stimulation and others (all <em>p</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed that STN-DBS did not affect the static balance negatively. Low-frequency (LF) stimulation improved the static equilibrium. Posturography systems will give more precise and quantitative results in similar studies with wide frequency ranges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849622000867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849622000867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation affect the static balance at different frequencies?
Purpose
To investigate the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) with different stimulation frequencies on static balance.
Materials and methods
Twenty patients (15 males and 5 females), aged between 43 and 81 (mean: 60.05 ± 7.4) years, who had been diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and undergone STN-DBS surgery were included in the study. Static balance was assessed with TecnoBody Rehabilitation System at four different frequencies: 230, 130, 90 and 60 Hz and off-stimulation. Static balance tests were ‘stabilometric test, stabilometric compared bipedal closed/opened eye, stabilometric compared mono pedal (right/left foot)’. These tests reported the centre of pressure data ‘ellipse area, perimeter, front/back and mediolateral standard deviations’.
Results
There were no statically differences between the static balance test results at any frequency (p > 0.05), but results were found better at 90 Hz. Stabilometric compared bipedal opened eye forward–backward standard deviation result was significant between off-stimulation and 130 Hz (p = 0.04). Different frequency stimulation affected the static balance categories percentage with no statistical significance between off-stimulation and others (all p > 0.05).
Conclusion
This study showed that STN-DBS did not affect the static balance negatively. Low-frequency (LF) stimulation improved the static equilibrium. Posturography systems will give more precise and quantitative results in similar studies with wide frequency ranges.