利用关西地区火灾保险经验评价台风飞燕(T1821)风场

Q4 Energy
Jun Tanemoto, Haruki Yamamoto
{"title":"利用关西地区火灾保险经验评价台风飞燕(T1821)风场","authors":"Jun Tanemoto, Haruki Yamamoto","doi":"10.5359/jwe.46.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typhoon Jebi (T1821) derived significant damages around Kansai area in Japan and recorded the highest fire insurance payment. Therefore, the accurate estimation of wind field for Jebi is quite important for the future ratemaking. In this study, several models, which are an engineering typhoon model, a meteorological model and combined/maximum of those models were used for the estimation and validated by using measurements at weather stations and compared with fire insurance payment database. Wind speeds obtained from the engineering typhoon model show better agreement with measurements at weather stations than the meteorological model. On the other hand, the wind speed distribution from the meteorological model shows best agreement with damage occurrences in the insurance payment database, and the wind speeds are higher than the engineering model in those area. It is also found that the relation between estimated wind speeds and damage occurrences are slightly improved by considering seismic intensity of the 2018 Osaka earthquake as regression parameters.","PeriodicalId":38974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluations of Wind Field Estimations for Typhoon Jebi (T1821) by Using Fire Insurance Experience in Kansai Area\",\"authors\":\"Jun Tanemoto, Haruki Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.5359/jwe.46.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Typhoon Jebi (T1821) derived significant damages around Kansai area in Japan and recorded the highest fire insurance payment. Therefore, the accurate estimation of wind field for Jebi is quite important for the future ratemaking. In this study, several models, which are an engineering typhoon model, a meteorological model and combined/maximum of those models were used for the estimation and validated by using measurements at weather stations and compared with fire insurance payment database. Wind speeds obtained from the engineering typhoon model show better agreement with measurements at weather stations than the meteorological model. On the other hand, the wind speed distribution from the meteorological model shows best agreement with damage occurrences in the insurance payment database, and the wind speeds are higher than the engineering model in those area. It is also found that the relation between estimated wind speeds and damage occurrences are slightly improved by considering seismic intensity of the 2018 Osaka earthquake as regression parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5359/jwe.46.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Energy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5359/jwe.46.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

台风“飞燕”(T1821)在日本关西地区造成了巨大损失,并创下了火灾保险赔付额的最高纪录。因此,准确估计杰壁地区的风场对今后的电价制定具有十分重要的意义。本文采用工程台风模型、气象模型及其组合/最大值模型进行估算,并利用气象站实测数据和火险赔付数据库进行验证。工程台风模型计算的风速与气象站测量值的吻合度较气象模型高。另一方面,气象模型的风速分布与保险赔付数据库中的灾害发生量吻合最好,且该地区的风速高于工程模型。以2018年大阪地震烈度为回归参数,估算风速与震害发生的关系略有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluations of Wind Field Estimations for Typhoon Jebi (T1821) by Using Fire Insurance Experience in Kansai Area
Typhoon Jebi (T1821) derived significant damages around Kansai area in Japan and recorded the highest fire insurance payment. Therefore, the accurate estimation of wind field for Jebi is quite important for the future ratemaking. In this study, several models, which are an engineering typhoon model, a meteorological model and combined/maximum of those models were used for the estimation and validated by using measurements at weather stations and compared with fire insurance payment database. Wind speeds obtained from the engineering typhoon model show better agreement with measurements at weather stations than the meteorological model. On the other hand, the wind speed distribution from the meteorological model shows best agreement with damage occurrences in the insurance payment database, and the wind speeds are higher than the engineering model in those area. It is also found that the relation between estimated wind speeds and damage occurrences are slightly improved by considering seismic intensity of the 2018 Osaka earthquake as regression parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wind Engineering
Journal of Wind Engineering Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Earth Sciences and Astronomy Agriculture and Food Sciences Engineering in General Architecture and Civil Engineering Mechanical Engineering Interdisciplinary Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信